Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BIGTRAIN
Real bright >>>> The point of any game where a score is kept is winning or they would not keep score >> I enjoy hockey as well as football, the others are boring, but losing like Lombardi said is losers >> If you enjoy seeing you team constantly failing ( IE LOSING ) and the ownership and management fail to fix the problem why do you watch ?? If they do not care enough about the people that pay the freight why should the fans care or support them ???
|
because we are all but simpletons WATCHING.. we aren't playing the game for the loser team. sure, if you are a PLAYER why stay in a losing city if you're focussed on winning only... but we are FANS...every year is a new chapter yet to be written, that's why we WATCH, and they PLAY...
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BIGTRAIN
The issue ( and several of you continue not to see it ) is what gives you team the best chance of winning not just getting there >> Whether you want to believe it or not Olie was and is a great upgrade over what each team had and because of that both teams are no longer in the hunt >> Looh at all three gaolies careers and tell me that Olie with not as good a team did not do the better job >>>>
|
so what will you be saying if the finals ends up calgary/philly... kiprusoff vs esche, by your standards neither have a *career to look back upon... really, i mean esche beat brodeur? that's not right.. kipper beat joseph.. !! what ??? nabokov stoned a former two time cup holder in osgood.. what??.. esche beat belfour too..
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by BIGTRAIN
You can believe it if you want , but Olie's contract was not the issue why neither team made the trade but what was expected in return by washington was >> To say he cost to much is an easy out to placate the fans for not steping up to the plate and getting a player the could win them the cup >>> From what I have read is that Muckler and Martin were blasted by the owner for not getting Olie and martin paid the biggest price by being fired >>
|
another question, if the contract ollie has was NOT A FACTOR, or issue.. then washington was simply asking too much for what other teams in the hunt for the cup felt he was worth. is washington's point of view the only one that matters when it comes to his value? or do the teams (who don't care about the contract) have a say in his value. really, if his contract meant nothing, why didn't ottawa or vancouver or whomever throw together a leetch type package and overpay ???.. why.. OH why...