HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2010 Draft Lottery Results - Rangers Pick 10th

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-12-2010, 05:19 PM
  #1
rangerjoe
Registered User
 
rangerjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
2010 Draft Lottery Results - Rangers Pick 10th

The 2010 Draft Lottery results will be announced tomorrow (Tuesday)...

In case anyone was wondering, the highest spot the Rangers can pick is #6 , and only if they win the lottery (they have a 2.1% chance of winning it). Only the top 5 teams (bottom five if you wanna look at it that way) have a shot at first overall draft pick (since the winner of the lottery drawing can only improve its draft order by up to four places). No team can drop more than one place, so Edmonton's guaranteed a top 2 pick.

There will be a total of 1,000 combinations, with Edmonton being assigned 250 combinations. As a result, they'll have a 25% chance. But since only the top five teams have a shot at first overall, they actually have a 48% chance at the first pick. Toronto will be assigned 188 combinations, and so on and so on..

The number of combinations that the Rangers will be assigned is 21 (2.1% chance).

Here are the NHL draft odds:

Edmonton - 25.0 percent
Toronto - 18.8 percent
Florida - 14.2 percent
Columbus - 10.7 percent
NY Islanders - 8.1 percent
Tampa Bay - 6.2 percent
Carolina - 4.7 percent
Atlanta - 3.6 percent
Minnesota - 2.7 percent
NY Rangers - 2.1 percent
Dallas - 1.5 percent
Anaheim - 1.1 percent
Calgary - 0.8 percent
St. Louis - 0.5 percent

LET'S GO RANGERS!

rangerjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:21 PM
  #2
KotsyJr
49ERS/NYR/RAPS/JAYS
 
KotsyJr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Pennsylvania
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,713
vCash: 873
Time for Bettman to rig it up.

#6 here we come. Lawl.

KotsyJr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:22 PM
  #3
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
We arent wining the lottery.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:22 PM
  #4
Fitzy
All Is Well
 
Fitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,917
vCash: 50
So we can very realistically end up 8th or 9th?

Fitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:23 PM
  #5
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzy Duke of NY View Post
So we can very realistically end up 8th or 9th?
Not at all.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:23 PM
  #6
NYRMatt
Registered User
 
NYRMatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Pennsylvania
Country: United States
Posts: 2,324
vCash: 1275
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzy Duke of NY View Post
So we can very realistically end up 8th or 9th?
I don't see why not. I'd be happy with 8th/9th.

NYRMatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:26 PM
  #7
captain9nyr
@captain9nyr
 
captain9nyr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hammonton, NJ
Country: United States
Posts: 936
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to captain9nyr
I think it would be hysterical if "Toronto" (which really means Boston) wins the lottery.

captain9nyr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:27 PM
  #8
Jumbo*
TARGET: ACQUIRED
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,720
vCash: 500
There is a 2.1% chance we move to 6.
There is a 3.9% chance we move back to 11.

There is 0% chance we move to 8 or 9.

Jumbo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:28 PM
  #9
rangerjoe
Registered User
 
rangerjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
Don't discount it, we can win it...it wouldn't be the first time a deep team won it.

Take a look at these since the lottery started:

1995 - Los Angeles (was 7th, moved to 3rd)
1998 - Tampa Bay (was 3rd, moved to 1st)
1999 - Chicago (was 8th, moved to 4th)
2000 - NY Islanders (was 5th, moved to 1st)
2001 - Atlanta (was 3rd, moved to 1st)
2002 - Florida (was 3rd, moved to 1st)
2003 - Florida (was 4th, moved to 1st
2004 - Washington (was 3rd, moved to 1st)
2007 - Chicago (was 5th, moved to 1st)

rangerjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:29 PM
  #10
Fitzy
All Is Well
 
Fitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,917
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jumbo View Post
There is a 2.1% chance we move to 6.
There is a 3.9% chance we move back to 11.

There is 0% chance we move to 8 or 9.
Thank you.

Fitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:44 PM
  #11
Bluenote13
Believe In Henke
 
Bluenote13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: BKLYN, NYC
Posts: 23,657
vCash: 500
I'll go with Toronto(Boston)

Bluenote13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:47 PM
  #12
pwoz
Registered User
 
pwoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,492
vCash: 500
Must be nice to build your team through lottery picks instead of 1st round exits and 9/10th place finishes.

pwoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:49 PM
  #13
Fitzy
All Is Well
 
Fitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 19,917
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by pwoz View Post
Must be nice to build your team through lottery picks instead of 1st round exits and 9/10th place finishes.
Do I need to bring the NJ devils up every time this conversation begins?

Oh, and someone call up the thread that shows how teams that tank often arent the ones that have success.

Fitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:50 PM
  #14
N9Y4R
Bleed Blue
 
N9Y4R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: The Gold Coast
Country: United States
Posts: 942
vCash: 500
There is a 94% chance we pick 10!

N9Y4R is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 05:51 PM
  #15
rangerjoe
Registered User
 
rangerjoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 676
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by N9Y4R View Post
There is a 94% chance we pick 10!
haha...please, resist such excitement!

rangerjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 06:07 PM
  #16
Hanke
Tortsless Rangers
 
Hanke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 4,203
vCash: 500
cant waitt!! hopefully we go down a few slots

Hanke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 06:27 PM
  #17
dedalus
Registered User
 
dedalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,215
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzy Duke of NY View Post
Do I need to bring the NJ devils up every time this conversation begins?
Do I need to bring up Scott Niedermayer (3rd overall), Brendan Shanahan (2nd overall), John Maclean (6th overall), Bill Guerin (5th overall), and Kirk Muller (2nd overall) every time this conversation begins?

dedalus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 06:49 PM
  #18
GAGLine
Registered User
 
GAGLine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 9,176
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzy Duke of NY View Post
Do I need to bring the NJ devils up every time this conversation begins?

Oh, and someone call up the thread that shows how teams that tank often arent the ones that have success.
Scott Stevens, 5th overall pick by Washington, 1982
Brendan Shanahan, 2nd overall pick by New Jersey, 1987
Bill Guerin, 5th overall pick by New Jersey,1989
Bobby Holik, 10th overall pick by Hartford, 1989
Scott Neidermeyer, 3rd overall pick by New Jersey, 1991
Brian Rolston, 11th overall pick by New Jersey, 1991
Jason Arnott, 7th overall pick by Edmonton, 1993

New Jersey had 3 top 5 picks in a 5 year period that all contributed in one way or another to their winning the cup. They traded Shanahan to get Stevens. Guerin and Rolston were there for the cup in 95. Neidermeyer and Stevens were both there for all 3 cups.

The devils traded Sean Burke and Eric Weinrich for Holik. Holik helped them win the cup in 95 and 2000.

Guerin and Zelepukin were traded for Arnott, with Arnott winning a cup in 2000.

Since 92, here are the devils 1st round picks:

92: Jason Smith, 18th overall
93: Denis Pederson, 13th overall
94: Vadim Sharifijanov, 25th overall
95: Petr Sykora, 18th overall
96: Lance Ward, 10th overall
97: Jean-Francois Damphousse, 24th overall
98: Mike Van Ryn, 26th overall
98: Scott Gomez, 27th overall
99: Ari Ahonen, 27th overall
00: David Hale, 22nd overall
01: Adrian Foster, 28th overall
02: N/A
03: Zach Parise, 17th overall
04: Travis Zajac, 20th overall
05: Nicklas Bergfors, 23rd overall
06: Matt Corrente, 30th overall
07: N/A
08: Mattias Tedenby, 24th overall
09: Jacob Josefson, 20th overall

There's a lot of bad picks in there, particularly between 92 and 2001. They did great picking Parise and Zajac. Bergfors looked pretty good as a rookie, but he's gone already for Kovy. And the jury is still out on Corrente, Tedenby and Josefson.

Yeah, they've been consistently one of the better teams in the league over the last 16 years, but their best players when they were winning the cup were all high draft picks (other than brodeur, who was a 20th overall pick in 1990).

Don't get me wrong, they are by far better managed than we are, but they had their share of high draft picks as well.

GAGLine is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 08:22 PM
  #19
McDonagh
Slow it down 30GHz
 
McDonagh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,643
vCash: 1350
Not getting my hopes up for moving up, I expect we will pick 10th, or whatever number it was where we have 90+% of getting.

McDonagh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 08:29 PM
  #20
pwoz
Registered User
 
pwoz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,492
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fitzy Duke of NY View Post
Do I need to bring the NJ devils up every time this conversation begins?

Oh, and someone call up the thread that shows how teams that tank often arent the ones that have success.
Lou is the exception.

pwoz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 08:40 PM
  #21
ChipAyten
NYR-LFC-NYG-NYY
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York City
Country: England
Posts: 3,831
vCash: 500
So the question remains, do we trade up? If it means getting Seguin I say yes. We need a productive center and unless it's either Lundqvist or Gaborik nobody is above being traded for him IMO.

ChipAyten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 09:37 PM
  #22
MSG the place to be*
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,783
vCash: 500
Just so you all understand. IT IS COMPLETELY DIFFERENT THAN THE NBA LOTTERY. There is one team that is the lottery winner and there is everybody else. But if you win the lottery you dont get first pick, you move up 4 spots from your original spot.

Therefore, we can only pick 6th, 10th or 11th.

6th is if we win the lottery
11th is if a team behind us wins the lottery and therefore moves up 4 spots and passes us (ie. Dallas Stars currently in 11th win the lottery giving them the 7th pick)
10th if a team in the top 9 wins the lottery

MSG the place to be* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 11:09 PM
  #23
dedalus
Registered User
 
dedalus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 7,215
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GAGLine View Post
Scott Stevens, 5th overall pick by Washington, 1982
Brendan Shanahan, 2nd overall pick by New Jersey, 1987
Bill Guerin, 5th overall pick by New Jersey,1989
Bobby Holik, 10th overall pick by Hartford, 1989
Scott Neidermeyer, 3rd overall pick by New Jersey, 1991
Brian Rolston, 11th overall pick by New Jersey, 1991
Jason Arnott, 7th overall pick by Edmonton, 1993

New Jersey had 3 top 5 picks in a 5 year period that all contributed in one way or another to their winning the cup. They traded Shanahan to get Stevens. Guerin and Rolston were there for the cup in 95. Neidermeyer and Stevens were both there for all 3 cups.
Add Kirk Muller to your list. The Devils drafted him 2nd overall and traded him for Stephane Richer ... the same Richer who led all Devils scorers in the '95 playoffs.

dedalus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 11:40 PM
  #24
TheHotRock
Registered User
 
TheHotRock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: nyc
Country: United States
Posts: 2,177
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChipAyten View Post
So the question remains, do we trade up? If it means getting Seguin I say yes. We need a productive center and unless it's either Lundqvist or Gaborik nobody is above being traded for him IMO.
obtaining a top 2 pick will require a massive overpayment.

TheHotRock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-12-2010, 11:43 PM
  #25
ChipAyten
NYR-LFC-NYG-NYY
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New York City
Country: England
Posts: 3,831
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheHotRock View Post
obtaining a top 2 pick will require a massive overpayment.
MDZ & a conditional, bam done deal. Boston would love an O-Dman

ChipAyten is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.