HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Minnesota Wild
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

5/5 Discussion - Best Wild Draft

View Poll Results: Which was the best draft in Minnesota history?
2000 NHL Draft (Gaborik, Schultz, Sekeras) 6 75.00%
2001 NHL Draft (Koivu, Veilleux, Boogaard) 1 12.50%
2002 NHL Draft (Bouchard, Harding, Foy) 0 0%
2003 NHL Draft (Burns, O'Sullivan) 1 12.50%
2007 NHL Draft (Gillies, Falk, Almond) 0 0%
Other (please explain) 0 0%
Voters: 8. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-05-2010, 02:34 PM
  #1
GopherState
Repeat Offender...
 
GopherState's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: X Marks The Spot
Posts: 22,783
vCash: 500
5/5 Discussion - Best Wild Draft

Along the same lines as yesterday's discussion, the Wild have had some great drafts in the past. So which draft was the best one?

__________________
Blog: First Round Bust: A Cast of Thousands celebrating a rather dodgy track record of Minnesota Wild Drafting.

"Will beats skill when skill doesn't have enough will."
-Doug Woog
1974 1976 1979 2002 2003 2014?
GopherState is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 02:58 PM
  #2
mnwildgophers
Registered User
 
mnwildgophers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: MN
Country: United States
Posts: 4,497
vCash: 500
I vote for 2000 since we got Gaborik, the best player in our team's history (besides Koivu), but we also got Schultz which we like to give a lot of crap about him, but it's been pointed out numerous times that he's not that bad of a defender and has been with us since the start.

2007 is easily our best draft as of late being that 4 of the 5 picks in that draft are now playing in the AHL. I think we are all hoping for the 2010 draft to be our best.

mnwildgophers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 03:57 PM
  #3
Jarick
Moderator
Doing Nothing
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 23,605
vCash: 500
I wouldn't say any of them have been great, but 2001 wasn't bad. Finding Veilleux and Boogaard in later rounds was nice, even if they're both role players. Recently we've had some good second rounders in Scandella and Hackett, and Haula might be a heck of a player down the road.

Jarick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 04:03 PM
  #4
thestonedkoala
Everyone! PANIC!
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 18,320
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarick View Post
I wouldn't say any of them have been great, but 2001 wasn't bad. Finding Veilleux and Boogaard in later rounds was nice, even if they're both role players. Recently we've had some good second rounders in Scandella and Hackett, and Haula might be a heck of a player down the road.
Hackett wasn't a second rounder

I would say 2001. Koivu, Veilleux, Boogaard. Wanvig played for a spell and Heid was at least traded.

thestonedkoala is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 04:06 PM
  #5
Jarick
Moderator
Doing Nothing
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 23,605
vCash: 500
Dang, even better. Then I could say third rounders like Hackett and Clutterbuck

Jarick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 04:11 PM
  #6
Surly Furious
Registered User
 
Surly Furious's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: frozen north
Posts: 6,948
vCash: 528
Here's hoping that the correct answer to this question in 10 years will be, "why, 2010 of course!"

Surly Furious is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 04:29 PM
  #7
GopherState
Repeat Offender...
 
GopherState's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: X Marks The Spot
Posts: 22,783
vCash: 500
I went with 2000 over 2001 because the Wild have gotten more out of Schultz and Sekeras than Veilleux and Boogaard.

GopherState is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 05:14 PM
  #8
Jbcraig1883
Registered User
 
Jbcraig1883's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Louisville, KY
Country: United States
Posts: 4,132
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by GopherState View Post
I went with 2000 over 2001 because the Wild have gotten more out of Schultz and Sekeras than Veilleux and Boogaard.
I agree with this man.

Jbcraig1883 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
05-05-2010, 05:45 PM
  #9
State of Hockey
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 11,189
vCash: 500
Although the picking positions were the best ever, 2000 netted us a superstar and a good defensemen. We made the right choice in Gaborik, and Schultz is about best player selected in that 2nd round.

State of Hockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:09 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.