HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Philadelphia Flyers
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Tremblay to play for Memorial Cup

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
05-11-2004, 12:36 PM
  #1
Chainsaw
Registered User
 
Chainsaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,795
vCash: 500
Tremblay to play for Memorial Cup

David Tremblay will play for the Memorial cup starting May 16th. What are his teams chances? What will a Memorial Cup do for his career in Philadelphia? What will this do on our approach to bring Roman Malek here? Does this Make Antero Niittymaki expendable?

Chainsaw is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 12:41 PM
  #2
Rex88
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 1,112
vCash: 500
His performance thus far moves him up the prospect chart.
Nitty is not going anyplace as his devpt. is on the fast track and he will get the vast majority of AHL starts next year (yes Sean will be back next year).
Malek can be had at this point as the younger guys (not just Tremblay) have really come along.

Rex88 is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 01:10 PM
  #3
John Flyers Fan
Registered User
 
John Flyers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 22,344
vCash: 500
No, it doesn't make Niittymaki expendable.

You can never have too many good young goalies.

Now, I've never seen Tremblay play, and he has to be good to be the #1 goalie on the best team in the Q, but from all reports the Gatineau team is loaded. Tremblay's job is more not to lose the game, than to have to win it.

John Flyers Fan is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 01:11 PM
  #4
Cuiff
Registered User
 
Cuiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Abington (Philly)
Country: Italy
Posts: 2,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex88
His performance thus far moves him up the prospect chart.
Nitty is not going anyplace as his devpt. is on the fast track and he will get the vast majority of AHL starts next year (yes Sean will be back next year).
How do you figure Sean will be back. He is Due 4.5 next year and the CBA is most likely going to install some type of Salary Cap/Salary Tax. Either/or, Comcast is not going to pay that.

Cuiff is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 01:14 PM
  #5
Pantokrator
Who's the clown?
 
Pantokrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Semmes, Alabama
Country: Guatemala
Posts: 4,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuiffitelli
How do you figure Sean will be back. He is Due 4.5 next year and the CBA is most likely going to install some type of Salary Cap/Salary Tax. Either/or, Comcast is not going to pay that.
WIll there be a contract lock that requires a team to pay contracts signed before the CBA?

Pantokrator is online now  
Old
05-11-2004, 01:16 PM
  #6
John Flyers Fan
Registered User
 
John Flyers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 22,344
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuiffitelli
How do you figure Sean will be back. He is Due 4.5 next year and the CBA is most likely going to install some type of Salary Cap/Salary Tax. Either/or, Comcast is not going to pay that.
#1. It's far from a definite that there will be a cap or tax.

#2. Burke has an unusual contract, that gives both him and the team an option for next year. The contract works as follows.

Approximately 10 days after the seaon ends both Burke and the Flyers submit sealed envelopes stating whether or not they want to excercise their option for next year.

If Burke only excercise his option he gets paid $4.25 million.

If Flyers only excercise their option Burke gets paid $4.75 million.

If both Burke and Flyers excercise their option he gets paid $4.5 million.

John Flyers Fan is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 01:45 PM
  #7
Cuiff
Registered User
 
Cuiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Abington (Philly)
Country: Italy
Posts: 2,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Flyers Fan
#1. It's far from a definite that there will be a cap or tax..
Come on John. All signs are pointing that way. Every article and interview I read says that this is the most likly outcome. Tim Pinaccho's (SP?) son works with me and he said that his father has talked to a lot of NHL people (Players, owners and coaches) and they all believe some type of cap/tax is inevitable, even if some people are against it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Flyers Fan
##2. Burke has an unusual contract, that gives both him and the team an option for next year. The contract works as follows.

Approximately 10 days after the seaon ends both Burke and the Flyers submit sealed envelopes stating whether or not they want to excercise their option for next year.

If Burke only excercise his option he gets paid $4.25 million...
too much for a 38 year old back up

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Flyers Fan
If Flyers only excercise their option Burke gets paid $4.75 million...
too much for a 38 year old back up

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Flyers Fan
If both Burke and Flyers excercise their option he gets paid $4.5 million.
too much for a 38 year old back up


Last edited by Cuiff: 05-11-2004 at 01:48 PM.
Cuiff is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 01:54 PM
  #8
John Flyers Fan
Registered User
 
John Flyers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 22,344
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuiffitelli

too much for a 38 year old back up
Burke in all likelihood isn't going to pass up a guarunteed $4.25 million ti be our back-up.

The only way I see it happening is if a team promises him the #1 job.

John Flyers Fan is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:01 PM
  #9
Cuiff
Registered User
 
Cuiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Abington (Philly)
Country: Italy
Posts: 2,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by John Flyers Fan
Burke in all likelihood isn't going to pass up a guarunteed $4.25 million ti be our back-up.

The only way I see it happening is if a team promises him the #1 job.

guaranteed!!!!!!!!!!


That might be a problem!

Cuiff is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:05 PM
  #10
Pantokrator
Who's the clown?
 
Pantokrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Semmes, Alabama
Country: Guatemala
Posts: 4,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vancouver_Flyers_fan
David Tremblay will play for the Memorial cup starting May 16th. What are his teams chances? What will a Memorial Cup do for his career in Philadelphia? What will this do on our approach to bring Roman Malek here? Does this Make Antero Niittymaki expendable?

Has Tremblay been crucial in these games so far, or has he just been along for the ride? Good, but not great?

Pantokrator is online now  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:06 PM
  #11
John Flyers Fan
Registered User
 
John Flyers Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 22,344
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuiffitelli
guaranteed!!!!!!!!!!


That might be a problem!
It's not guarunteed if Burke doesn't want to come back and the Flyers don't want him back.

I highly doubt that Burke turns down $4.25 million and walk unless he is guarunteed a starting job by someone else, and the only team I can possibly see doing that is New York, and I don't think it will happen.

John Flyers Fan is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:14 PM
  #12
LaLaLaprise
lalalaprise -twitter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,717
vCash: 500
Tremnblay is his teams weakness.

Its awfully hard to lok bad in front of a team like that.

He is a solid prospect but dont get carried away.

LaLaLaprise is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 02:25 PM
  #13
Pantokrator
Who's the clown?
 
Pantokrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Semmes, Alabama
Country: Guatemala
Posts: 4,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by La-La-Laprise
Tremnblay is his teams weakness.

Its awfully hard to lok bad in front of a team like that.

He is a solid prospect but dont get carried away.
Thanks. Where do you think he ranks this year in the Quebec league overall? Top 5? Top 10?

Pantokrator is online now  
Old
05-11-2004, 03:28 PM
  #14
Rex88
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 1,112
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuiffitelli
How do you figure Sean will be back. He is Due 4.5 next year and the CBA is most likely going to install some type of Salary Cap/Salary Tax. Either/or, Comcast is not going to pay that.
Because HE has the option to take the contract.

Rex88 is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 03:41 PM
  #15
Cuiff
Registered User
 
Cuiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Abington (Philly)
Country: Italy
Posts: 2,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rex88
Because HE has the option to take the contract.
Little late but thanks for trying to clear that up.

I did not know he had the option as well. That is such a bad deal for the Flyers


Last edited by Cuiff: 05-11-2004 at 03:44 PM.
Cuiff is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 03:49 PM
  #16
Hossa
Registered User
 
Hossa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Abroad
Posts: 9,227
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantokrator
Has Tremblay been crucial in these games so far, or has he just been along for the ride? Good, but not great?
As La-La-Laprise said, he's probably the weakest link on Gatineau, and he had a big of a meltdown in game 4. BUt he was also fantastic in game 5, so he's got some big game ability in him. He's nothing special at this point. He's one of the better goalies in the Q, but not only are three very good defencemen (Vagner, O'brien, D'amour) in front of him, but the team plays a very, very stingy defensive game.

At this point, he's only had one year as a starter, and it was for arguably the best team in the CHL who were as good defensively as any team I've ever seen in the QMJHL. He is big but kind of lean and very fluid. No doubt he has talent, but the big test will be the AHL for him. Obviously that isn't next year, but living in Ottawa I've seen many goalies under Kilrea's system (Craig Hillier anybody???) who thrived in junior because of a great defensive team in front of them, but crumbled in professional hockey. Tremblay could be the same.

Hossa is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 05:29 PM
  #17
gatineau101
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 9
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by La-La-Laprise
Tremnblay is his teams weakness.

Its awfully hard to lok bad in front of a team like that.

He is a solid prospect but dont get carried away.
Sincerely La-La-Laprise, How many times have you seen Tremblay play? Maybe 6-7 times?? You base your report probably on the numbers of shots and the number of dangereus one's. Yeah, he got pulled out in two games, who cares, in the rest of the games, he kept his team in the game. Ok, he did not receive lots of shots, but he proved that when it really counts, he can play great.(game 5)

gatineau101 is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 05:47 PM
  #18
gatineau101
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Country: Canada
Posts: 9
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantokrator
Has Tremblay been crucial in these games so far, or has he just been along for the ride? Good, but not great?
He stole one game in every series.

gatineau101 is offline  
Old
05-11-2004, 06:36 PM
  #19
stanley
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 4,588
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cuiffitelli
That is such a bad deal for the Flyers
???

I don't know about everyone else, but Sean Burke as a $4.25M insurance policy in a town which hasn't known a stable goaltending situation since the Reagan administration (no joke) seems like a GREAT deal to me. He hasn't played but a few minutes in a runaway game this playoff season, but we just can't tell how much of Esche's development into a rock-solid goaltender this spring has been due to Burke's presence.

stanley is offline  
Old
05-12-2004, 06:00 AM
  #20
Pantokrator
Who's the clown?
 
Pantokrator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Semmes, Alabama
Country: Guatemala
Posts: 4,348
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hossa
As La-La-Laprise said, he's probably the weakest link on Gatineau, and he had a big of a meltdown in game 4. BUt he was also fantastic in game 5, so he's got some big game ability in him. He's nothing special at this point. He's one of the better goalies in the Q, but not only are three very good defencemen (Vagner, O'brien, D'amour) in front of him, but the team plays a very, very stingy defensive game.

At this point, he's only had one year as a starter, and it was for arguably the best team in the CHL who were as good defensively as any team I've ever seen in the QMJHL. He is big but kind of lean and very fluid. No doubt he has talent, but the big test will be the AHL for him. Obviously that isn't next year, but living in Ottawa I've seen many goalies under Kilrea's system (Craig Hillier anybody???) who thrived in junior because of a great defensive team in front of them, but crumbled in professional hockey. Tremblay could be the same.
Thank you for your response!

Pantokrator is online now  
Old
05-12-2004, 09:23 AM
  #21
Cuiff
Registered User
 
Cuiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Abington (Philly)
Country: Italy
Posts: 2,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by stanley
???

I don't know about everyone else, but Sean Burke as a $4.25M insurance policy in a town which hasn't known a stable goaltending situation since the Reagan administration (no joke) seems like a GREAT deal to me. He hasn't played but a few minutes in a runaway game this playoff season, but we just can't tell how much of Esche's development into a rock-solid goaltender this spring has been due to Burke's presence.

The conversation is not about now, but about next season. Paying Burke (or any back up) $4.5 mil next season, especially if there is a cap or tax is not a good idea for any team. It sucks that he has that option on his contract. I am positive that if the option was the Flyers only, they would reject it.


Last edited by Cuiff: 05-12-2004 at 09:28 AM.
Cuiff is offline  
Old
05-13-2004, 11:53 AM
  #22
LaLaLaprise
lalalaprise -twitter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,717
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pantokrator
Thanks. Where do you think he ranks this year in the Quebec league overall? Top 5? Top 10?
Top 10 for sure. Only 16 teams.

Id put him around 5th-7th.

Still a good goalie, but id rather have Nittymakki on my team.

LaLaLaprise is offline  
Old
05-13-2004, 11:55 AM
  #23
LaLaLaprise
lalalaprise -twitter
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Halifax, Nova Scotia
Posts: 8,717
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by gatineau101
Sincerely La-La-Laprise, How many times have you seen Tremblay play? Maybe 6-7 times?? You base your report probably on the numbers of shots and the number of dangereus one's. Yeah, he got pulled out in two games, who cares, in the rest of the games, he kept his team in the game. Ok, he did not receive lots of shots, but he proved that when it really counts, he can play great.(game 5)
I think it is a compliment to your team to have Tremblay as the weakness dont ya think.

I dont base anything on numbers there pal. I think Tremblay is in the top 5-7 goalies in the QMJHL. If you think he is higher than that you are obviously a homer.

LaLaLaprise is offline  
Old
05-13-2004, 12:05 PM
  #24
GoneFullHextall
Fire Berube
 
GoneFullHextall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Somewhere in NH
Country: United States
Posts: 31,910
vCash: 500
Burke may cost alot of money but i say there is a good chance they bring him back. Im not sure Hitch trusts 2 young goaltenders yet. he obviously trusts Esche but can he trust Niitty in a back up role? not sure. im just going by Hitch's track record which might suggest he keeps Burke or brings in another possibilly low cost veteran backup

GoneFullHextall is offline  
Old
05-13-2004, 12:10 PM
  #25
iceman42
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Bethlehem, NH
Country: Ireland
Posts: 1,206
vCash: 500
One thing I would like to bring up is that Boucher was coming along nicely, made a good run in the playoffs, had a vet backup that would teach and settle him down. Next year theres no vet back up, Checko came in and he seemed to be lost. While I dont think Boucher=Esche, I would feel more comfortable going into next year or whenever they play next with that saftey net for Esche, dont throw him into a situation where he has to secure the #1 from a flashy and very good rookie, while also mentoring him, while he himself was being mentored a year eariler, I dont think thats fair to Esche.

iceman42 is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:16 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.