Sharks re-sign Marleau ($6.9m) and Pavelski ($4m) to 4yr deals.
06-24-2010, 10:39 AM
#1
Chiagr
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southern N.B.
Country:
Posts: 16,587
vCash: 500
Sharks re-sign Marleau ($6.9m) and Pavelski ($4m) to 4yr deals.
http://twitter.com/DarrenDreger/status/16937988645
Quote:
Sharks re-sign Marleau and Pavelski. Marleau 4 yrs, $6.9 per year. Pavelski $4 mil per year.
06-24-2010, 10:40 AM
#2
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,574
vCash: 500
06-24-2010, 10:40 AM
#3
Go Sharks :(
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Across from the Tank
Country:
Posts: 5,469
vCash: 500
Me likey. <33
06-24-2010, 10:41 AM
#4
i'm not even mad
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Davis, CA
Country:
Posts: 4,148
vCash: 500
I was going to post it!
Damn general board proles moving in on my signing threads.
Anyway, Pavs at $4 is nice, I was expecting $4.5. I wish Patty would've taken a hometown discount but whatever.
06-24-2010, 10:41 AM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Stockton, CA
Posts: 874
vCash: 500
Sweet. I was hoping Marleau would take a bit more of a discount, but he's definitely worth the money.
06-24-2010, 10:42 AM
#6
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 2,574
vCash: 500
Marleau $6.9 million a year, Pavelski $4 million a year. [From Darren Dreger's twitter]
06-24-2010, 10:43 AM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SF/Bay Area
Posts: 4,946
vCash: 500
**** Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
06-24-2010, 10:44 AM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,424
vCash: 500
06-24-2010, 10:45 AM
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2002
Country:
Posts: 5,341
vCash: 500
Think DW could have saved 1 million on both contracts but what the hey! (Is that the expression?)
06-24-2010, 10:46 AM
#10
Go Sharks :(
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Across from the Tank
Country:
Posts: 5,469
vCash: 500
"financial terms of the deals was not disclosed"
^according to the Sharks website. Where is Dreger getting these numbers?
06-24-2010, 10:48 AM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country:
Posts: 533
vCash: 500
woooooooooooo
but excellent deals. 6.9 per is a touch high, but he would have gotten more on the open market, and only 4 years is a steal.
getting pavs to take 4 mil was nice though. oddly enough I think he took less for the opposite reason as patty, to hit free agency quicker.
06-24-2010, 10:49 AM
#12
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country:
Posts: 23,404
vCash: 500
This leaves 12.225 mil for a goalie, a d-man, and four forwards to ice the minimum roster.
06-24-2010, 10:50 AM
#13
#FreeRaffi
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sonoma County, CA
Country:
Posts: 3,925
vCash: 500
So we can expect Seto to sign for $3M? 3.3M?
06-24-2010, 10:50 AM
#14
SACK T-MAC
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Dallas, TX (Ugh)
Country:
Posts: 8,459
vCash: 500
Funny, Pollak says Pavs is betweeen 4 and 5 mil a year, but this twitter report says exactly at 4.
http://blogs.mercurynews.com/sharks/...-and-pavelski/
__________________
2011: Outcoached by Vigneault. 2012: Outcoached all season and postseason by Hitch.
2013: Outcoached by most coaches in the NHL. Who's left? 12 year olds on Xbox Live? SACK T-MAC NOW
06-24-2010, 10:53 AM
#15
Oh baby! Oh mama!!
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: I'm behind Niemi
Country:
Posts: 517
vCash: 500
Thank goodness!
I am sooo happy.
Of course a discount would have been nice, but we don't know the details, so maybe the length of term concession was the "discount". I'm sure Patty would have preferred a longer contract. And now I have to go through this again in 4 years.
06-24-2010, 11:01 AM
#16
Global Moderator
COYS!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,359
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Pinkfloyd
This leaves 12.225 mil for a goalie, a d-man, and four forwards to ice the minimum roster.
If they were smart, they go with the young guys in net and leave a few million under the cap so if they HAVE to, they can deal for one (Vokoun) at the deadline. If they don't need a goalie then, they can spend it on something else.
Take a chance and trust the young goalies.
__________________
5 down 11 to go
06-24-2010, 11:01 AM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: The Double Q
Country:
Posts: 2,824
vCash: 500
Any word on NMC's... maybe thats why Patty got as much
06-24-2010, 11:05 AM
#18
HFBoards Sponsor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,046
vCash: 500
THANK GOD.
Losing patty would have been devastating to the Sharks. I was hoping for 6.5, but meh, its close enough.
Plus, my authentic Marleau jersey is safe!
06-24-2010, 11:10 AM
#19
Global Moderator
COYS!
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 28,359
vCash: 500
$6.9 and a Shark is better than $7.9 and a King.
06-24-2010, 11:11 AM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 845
vCash: 500
Woulda been nice to see a long term deal for Marleau for him to remain a Shark the rest of his career. Do you guys think the length of the contract has anything to do with the 35 and over rule? Marleau's currently 30 which means the next time he's a free agent, he'll be 34.
06-24-2010, 11:14 AM
#21
20% Cooler
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Equestria
Posts: 1,715
vCash: 500
Wish he would have taken a discount, but I can't complain much since the Pavelski deal is excellent.
On that note, he hasn't came to a deal with Seto, and I'm under the impression that his rights are being shopped around. Which is great!
06-24-2010, 11:16 AM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 845
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
NorthBaySharksFan
So we can expect Seto to sign for $3M? 3.3M?
If I was Seto's agent, I wouldn't settle for less than 3.6 which is what Clowe received.
06-24-2010, 11:16 AM
#23
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 5,725
vCash: 500
I dont get why you dont do a 6-8 year deal to help with the cap hit
06-24-2010, 11:17 AM
#24
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 14
vCash: 500
Nice sign up, Lil Joe is the best
Pavel-Key for the future
06-24-2010, 11:17 AM
#25
HFBoards Sponsor
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,046
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by
UniversalRemonster
Wish he would have taken a discount, but I can't complain much since the Pavelski deal is excellent.
On that note, he hasn't came to a deal with Seto, and I'm under the impression that his rights are being shopped around. Which is great!
I doubt it. Theres been no indication of that what-so-ever.
Plus, who do you plan to replace Seto with that doesn't slow down the top-6 considerably? You cant. We need to improve out top-6 speed, not slow it down.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:05 PM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"