HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Brent Burns

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-03-2010, 01:25 PM
  #1
Crowdy
Co-founder, Crowdy
 
Crowdy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Orange County, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 5,801
vCash: 500
Brent Burns

What is the value of Brent Burns to Anaheim?

- The Ducks will not trade Getzlaf, Perry, or Ryan.

- The Ducks have a deep prospect pool. (i.e. Gardiner, Palmieri, McMillan, Clark, Holland etc.)

Crowdy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:27 PM
  #2
Finnish Your Czechs
Registered User
 
Finnish Your Czechs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,165
vCash: 500
Why would Minnesota trade him?

Finnish Your Czechs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:36 PM
  #3
carlweezer*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,406
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericnut View Post
What is the value of Brent Burns to Anaheim?

- The Ducks will not trade Getzlaf, Perry, or Ryan.

- The Ducks have a deep prospect pool. (i.e. Gardiner, Palmieri, McMillan, Clark, Holland etc.)
then who do you want the ducks to trade to pick upa young big Defenceman with lots of potential..

Fulton Reid? or the guy that shoots knucklepucks

carlweezer* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:38 PM
  #4
carlweezer*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,406
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by JCiarniello View Post
Why would Minnesota trade him?
these are questions you simplu dont ask on HF boards ...its all fantasay..

Just look at the front page, "value for Malkin"etc etc

carlweezer* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:39 PM
  #5
sweHockeypunk21
Registered User
 
sweHockeypunk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CALI
Country: Sweden
Posts: 895
vCash: 500
What off roster players and picks other than Murray, Mitchell or Huskins would it take to get Burns on to the Sharks?

sweHockeypunk21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:40 PM
  #6
Mizral
Registered User
 
Mizral's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Earth, MW
Country: Canada
Posts: 18,160
vCash: 500
It seems like Minnesota essentially is like an AHL team in the NHL. Basically they produce good young players and then farm them out right before their prime. This likely means the Burns might be dealt but if this management group knew what they were doing they would hang on to this guy unless some GM out there is just crazy and offers you the moon. Burns some nights can take over games and if he played for a team like Toronto he'd be considered as good as Phaneuf IMO.

Mizral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:40 PM
  #7
Ronaldo
★★★
 
Ronaldo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 38,680
vCash: 55
To
Brent Burns

to
Lupul
Palimeri
1 st

That's what it would take IMO.

Ronaldo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:51 PM
  #8
nickschultzfan
Registered User
 
nickschultzfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,312
vCash: 500
Bobby Ryan.

Now go away.

nickschultzfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 01:52 PM
  #9
nickschultzfan
Registered User
 
nickschultzfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,312
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizral View Post
It seems like Minnesota essentially is like an AHL team in the NHL. Basically they produce good young players and then farm them out right before their prime. This likely means the Burns might be dealt but if this management group knew what they were doing they would hang on to this guy unless some GM out there is just crazy and offers you the moon. Burns some nights can take over games and if he played for a team like Toronto he'd be considered as good as Phaneuf IMO.
This post makes no sense.

nickschultzfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 02:01 PM
  #10
Sharksfan83
Registered User
 
Sharksfan83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 1,636
vCash: 500
Petrecki + Murray/clowe + 1st '11 ?

Sharksfan83 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 02:01 PM
  #11
KingsCrown
Registered User
 
KingsCrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 244
vCash: 500
Stoll, Moller/Teubert/Moller, 1st.

KingsCrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 02:09 PM
  #12
flames123
Registered User
 
flames123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,496
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mizral View Post
It seems like Minnesota essentially is like an AHL team in the NHL. Basically they produce good young players and then farm them out right before their prime. This likely means the Burns might be dealt but if this management group knew what they were doing they would hang on to this guy unless some GM out there is just crazy and offers you the moon. Burns some nights can take over games and if he played for a team like Toronto he'd be considered as good as Phaneuf IMO.
a lot of people are as good as phaneuf

flames123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 02:37 PM
  #13
grN1g
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 1,582
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ericnut View Post
What is the value of Brent Burns to Anaheim?

- The Ducks will not trade Getzlaf, Perry, or Ryan.


- The Ducks have a deep prospect pool. (i.e. Gardiner, Palmieri, McMillan, Clark, Holland etc.)
then thats where this conversation ends.

grN1g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 02:48 PM
  #14
Oroku Saki*
Pete Hearts Volch
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rocky Point
Country: United States
Posts: 24,130
vCash: 500
Zajac, Langenbrunner, Tedenby, 1st

Burns, PMB.


Last edited by Oroku Saki*: 08-03-2010 at 03:05 PM.
Oroku Saki* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 02:52 PM
  #15
Gibsons Finest
R-E-L-A-X
 
Gibsons Finest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saskatoon/Brandon
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,295
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by grN1g View Post
then thats where this conversation ends.
Why? Burns at his finest isn't as valuable as any of them, and he has some concerns due to his drop off in play coming off a concussion. I really don't get it, you're not going to get a Getzlaf, Perry or Ryan anywhere else, so why punish Anaheim for not giving one up either? Unless you're saying that the Wild simply aren't trading him or whatever.

Anyway, from an Anaheim perspective I'd offer Lupul, one of Gardiner(not included because he's a MN native, just a coincidence) or one of the forward prospects(take your pick) and a pick, maybe even a first if it came down to it. IMO that'd be pretty even, solid top-6 forward who can score goals in bunches and does a lot of things well, either a potential top-pairing defenseman or potential top-6 forward prospect and a draft pick. That's probably a pretty good value for a guy like Burns.

Gibsons Finest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:04 PM
  #16
nickschultzfan
Registered User
 
nickschultzfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 6,312
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Ryan Getzlaf View Post
Why? Burns at his finest isn't as valuable as any of them, and he has some concerns due to his drop off in play coming off a concussion. I really don't get it, you're not going to get a Getzlaf, Perry or Ryan anywhere else, so why punish Anaheim for not giving one up either? Unless you're saying that the Wild simply aren't trading him or whatever.

Anyway, from an Anaheim perspective I'd offer Lupul, one of Gardiner(not included because he's a MN native, just a coincidence) or one of the forward prospects(take your pick) and a pick, maybe even a first if it came down to it. IMO that'd be pretty even, solid top-6 forward who can score goals in bunches and does a lot of things well, either a potential top-pairing defenseman or potential top-6 forward prospect and a draft pick. That's probably a pretty good value for a guy like Burns.
Oh, the classic "I'll bash the player I am asking to be traded to my team."

Unless Ryan is coming the other way, Burns is going to be on the Wild for a long while.

nickschultzfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:11 PM
  #17
WildisLaw
Just win, baby
 
WildisLaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Napa Valley, Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,553
vCash: 500
Burns will not be traded, he is going to be an absolute beast this year.

WildisLaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:14 PM
  #18
WildisLaw
Just win, baby
 
WildisLaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Napa Valley, Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,553
vCash: 500
And ill say it again, the Wild do not want Lupul. It will take overpayment to get Burns and that ends in Bobby Ryan.

WildisLaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:16 PM
  #19
Takao
kesbae
 
Takao's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Southern California
Country: United States
Posts: 9,913
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildisLaw View Post
And ill say it again, the Wild do not want Lupul. It will take overpayment to get Burns and that ends in Bobby Ryan.
It couldn't even start with Bobby Ryan

Takao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:18 PM
  #20
Talentless Practise*
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 5,244
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickschultzfan View Post
Oh, the classic "I'll bash the player I am asking to be traded to my team."
Lovely logic.

Talentless Practise* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:18 PM
  #21
Jimmy McNulty
Registered User
 
Jimmy McNulty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 1,620
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Ryan Getzlaf View Post
Why? Burns at his finest isn't as valuable as any of them, and he has some concerns due to his drop off in play coming off a concussion. I really don't get it, you're not going to get a Getzlaf, Perry or Ryan anywhere else, so why punish Anaheim for not giving one up either? Unless you're saying that the Wild simply aren't trading him or whatever.
Your post is reasonable, but Burns "at his finest" is a top pairing defenseman. You don't think that a young top pairing defenseman is worth Bobby Ryan?

The reason Wild fans keep demanding Ryan is because all of the stuff that is "fair value" makes the Wild worse. Lupul is decent, but overpaid and not that great; he could score 25 goals, or he could score 15 again like he did in Edmonton. Gardiner, the 1st, the forward prospect are all nice pieces but mostly for a rebuilding team. If the Wild were rebuilding, wouldn't they just keep their 25-year old potential stud defenseman?

Strictly value-wise, your proposal is probably good. But teams also need some reason to make a trade and too many times, that gets overlooked and/or mixed in with what is and isn't fair value.


Last edited by Jimmy McNulty: 08-03-2010 at 03:29 PM.
Jimmy McNulty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:23 PM
  #22
JSilvius*
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 839
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobby Ryan Getzlaf View Post
Why? Burns at his finest isn't as valuable as any of them, and he has some concerns due to his drop off in play coming off a concussion. I really don't get it, you're not going to get a Getzlaf, Perry or Ryan anywhere else, so why punish Anaheim for not giving one up either? Unless you're saying that the Wild simply aren't trading him or whatever.

Anyway, from an Anaheim perspective I'd offer Lupul, one of Gardiner(not included because he's a MN native, just a coincidence) or one of the forward prospects(take your pick) and a pick, maybe even a first if it came down to it. IMO that'd be pretty even, solid top-6 forward who can score goals in bunches and does a lot of things well, either a potential top-pairing defenseman or potential top-6 forward prospect and a draft pick. That's probably a pretty good value for a guy like Burns.
You're underestimating Burns. You won't get him for that package.

JSilvius* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:27 PM
  #23
WildisLaw
Just win, baby
 
WildisLaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Napa Valley, Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,553
vCash: 500
Burns at his finest shuts down all 3 of those guys.

WildisLaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:37 PM
  #24
Gibsons Finest
R-E-L-A-X
 
Gibsons Finest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Saskatoon/Brandon
Country: Canada
Posts: 19,295
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WildisLaw View Post
Burns at his finest shuts down all 3 of those guys.
Nik Lidstrom couldn't shut those 3 guys down, why Brent Burns could, I don't know.

And, for the poster who accused me of such, I wasn't bashing Burns, I'd love to have him. But saying he doesn't have concerns is just being ignorant. I wasn't even trying to point that out and say his value should be low, I think a healthy Brent Burns for a healthy Lupul, Gardiner and a 1st would be quite good value as well. My main point that was a concern-free Burns isn't worth one of those guys, so why would a Burns coming off a concussion be worth them?

And no, a concern-free Burns isn't worth one of those guys. Burns may be a top pairing defender when healthy, but he is still somewhat raw and he's probably not a #1 at this point. All three Duck forwards, however, are all Burns' age or younger, are proven premier first line talents, and the guy Wild fans want is arguably a potential franchise forward on many clubs. Not to mention Burns is a UFA in two years.

Gibsons Finest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-03-2010, 03:45 PM
  #25
usernam*
#TeamSuccess
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 4,927
vCash: 500
Non-Wild Fan: I heard Burns is available. Would love to get him on ___. What would it take?

Wild Fan: He's not on the block really. But if he is moved, it won't be for anything less than a young 1st line winger or a top-6 center.

Non-Wild Fan: How about a [salary dump] + young Dman + middling forward + pick

Wild Fan: Ah no. 1st line winger or top-6 center.

Non-Wild Fan: How about [weaker NHL Dman] + [forward not in NHL yet]?

Wild Fan: ? Burns won't be moved for anything BUT a young 1st line winger or top-6 center.

Non-Wild Fan: How about [mid-30s vet with 1-year on his contract] straight up?

Wild Fan: What part of young 1st line winger or top-6 center don't you get?

Non-Wild Fan: You are asking for too much. Burns isn't going to get that. Have fun trying to trade him.

Wild Fan: We aren't!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

There now we can continue.

usernam* is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.