HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Tor - Stl

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
08-04-2010, 11:54 AM
  #1
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Tor - Stl

Toronto gets:

Brad Boyes - 4m in salary for two years

St. Louis gets:

Tomas Kaberle - 4.25 in salary for one year

This trade would basically be based on the premise that St. Louis is open to playing Pietrangelo in Peoria for a year. If they want an NHL spot for him, there likely isn't room to add a defenceman without sending one back. Of course, with Brewer on the team, there'd likely be room to bring him in once an injury happens. Bottom line though, St. Louis adds a top defenceman, improves their chances of being a competitive playoff team, and doesn't part with any of their breakout young players.

Toronto takes a huge gamble in this one, but I think highly enough of Boyes to see him bouncing back as a 30 goal talent. They need a goal scorer to take some heat off Kessel, and I could see Boyes working well on a second line with Versteeg. I'm not going to get into quibbling over picks and throw-ins. Thoughts?

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:57 AM
  #2
mcphllp
Dion @ 6.5=Discount
 
mcphllp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,994
vCash: 500
id be fine with it, but i dont think the blues have kept pietrangelo down in juniors and benched with the big team over the past 2 years for him to waste a year in the ahl.

pretty sure he's playing with the big club. and after resigning CC, I cant see the blues going after kaberle.

mcphllp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:04 PM
  #3
Turk
Registered User
 
Turk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 414
vCash: 500
Good one.

Turk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:05 PM
  #4
Kessley Snipes
Registered User
 
Kessley Snipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
Id much rather go back in time and not trade Brad Boyes et. al for Owen Nolan

Kessley Snipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:08 PM
  #5
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blader258 View Post
Id much rather go back in time and not trade Brad Boyes et. al for Owen Nolan
I don't regret that deal at all. The Leafs had a cup contender that year, and Nolan was a great player. People cried about what we gave up for Leetch too, but we don't hear about that now that none of those players turned out.

Plus, he gets a free pass for rubbing that flu game against the Sens in.

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:13 PM
  #6
Makaveli
Registered User
 
Makaveli's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Toronto
Country: India
Posts: 2,161
vCash: 500
David Backes for Kaberle+Stefanovich?

Makaveli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:14 PM
  #7
Seventeen Twos
Registered User
 
Seventeen Twos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 376
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Makaveli View Post
David Backes for Kaberle+Stefanovich?
lets not get carried away here.

Boyes would be a nice addition - a 1b option after kessel

Seventeen Twos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:20 PM
  #8
All Day*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,149
vCash: 500
I'd do it, but would St. Louis want a one year rental?

All Day* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:21 PM
  #9
mcphllp
Dion @ 6.5=Discount
 
mcphllp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,994
vCash: 500
backes would be nice too

mcphllp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:22 PM
  #10
blue bleeder 24-7
Registered User
 
blue bleeder 24-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 1,381
vCash: 500
St. Louis says no, again. I've seen this proposed about 5 times here now.

Dear Maple Leafs fans,
The Blues need scoring, not defense. You can not have Brad Boyes if your return is Tomas Kaberle. It does not address the Blues' needs.

Thanks,
Me.

blue bleeder 24-7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:25 PM
  #11
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Tomas Kaberle does a lot to provide scoring. That's basically his role as a puckmoving defenceman.

Totally understandable if St. Louis would rather bank on Boyes returning to form though.

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:35 PM
  #12
MattVenca
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 411
vCash: 500
Boyes = Bozak

IMO, Bozak and Boyes are too similar. Boyes has more of a scorer's approach while Bozak is more of a playmaker, but Tyler can score and Brad can pass.
Boyes is a $4M cap hit, 4 years older, and now clogs up space at center (Bozak, Kadri, Grabovski, Mitchell, Hanson...) - His production at wing is not good enoguh for a player who's soft

If Toronto wants a center, he has to be a noticeable upgrade from Bozak and Kadri. As well, Grabovski needs to go the other way in the deal.

Kaberle for Boyes? I say no.

MattVenca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:40 PM
  #13
LMFAO
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 935
vCash: 500
The blues defense is set

Johnson - Brewer
Pietriangelo - Jackman
Colaiacovo - Polak/Cole

they don't need Kaberle

LMFAO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:41 PM
  #14
mcphllp
Dion @ 6.5=Discount
 
mcphllp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 6,994
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattVenca View Post
IMO, Bozak and Boyes are too similar. Boyes has more of a scorer's approach while Bozak is more of a playmaker, but Tyler can score and Brad can pass.
Boyes is a $4M cap hit, 4 years older, and now clogs up space at center (Bozak, Kadri, Grabovski, Mitchell, Hanson...) - His production at wing is not good enoguh for a player who's soft

If Toronto wants a center, he has to be a noticeable upgrade from Bozak and Kadri. As well, Grabovski needs to go the other way in the deal.

Kaberle for Boyes? I say no.
leafs are looking for a winger that can score goals, that is boyes

boyes and bozak are pretty different.

bozak is closer to andy macdonald, imo

mcphllp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:43 PM
  #15
Kessley Snipes
Registered User
 
Kessley Snipes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,322
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by grabo84 View Post
I don't regret that deal at all. The Leafs had a cup contender that year, and Nolan was a great player. People cried about what we gave up for Leetch too, but we don't hear about that now that none of those players turned out.

Plus, he gets a free pass for rubbing that flu game against the Sens in.


That flu game was great to watch. The sens bench was dropping like flies as we came back from a 4-0 defecit to win the game. I never cried about the Leetch deal. I was just really attached to Alyn McCauley and knew Brad Boyes had 30 goal potential. If I am not mistaken didnt Nolan get hurt during that years playoff run anyway?

or was it the year after that he banged up his knee.

Kessley Snipes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:45 PM
  #16
RogerRoeper*
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 21,694
vCash: 500
This is a very fair deal given the season Boyes is coming off of.

RogerRoeper* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:47 PM
  #17
RogerRoeper*
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 21,694
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blader258 View Post
Id much rather go back in time and not trade Brad Boyes et. al for Owen Nolan
I didn't mind the deal. The Leafs had to make a move to go for a cup. They had a veteren team and were a contender in the East. I was screaming for them to do something at the time.

It didn't work, but they did exactly what I wanted at the time.

RogerRoeper* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 12:48 PM
  #18
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blader258 View Post
That flu game was great to watch. The sens bench was dropping like flies as we came back from a 4-0 defecit to win the game. I never cried about the Leetch deal. I was just really attached to Alyn McCauley and knew Brad Boyes had 30 goal potential. If I am not mistaken didnt Nolan get hurt during that years playoff run anyway?

or was it the year after that he banged up his knee.
I think it was the next year that he hurt his knee. McCauley was awesome, it's too bad he ran into injury trouble.

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:05 PM
  #19
QMJHLfollower
Go Leafs!Our target:
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,285
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by grabo84 View Post
People cried about what we gave up for Leetch too
That's was a good trade, we give to the Rangers Jarkko Immonen(today play in FNL), Maxim Kondratiev(today play in KHL), a first round pick that become Kris Chucko(today play in AHL), and a second round pick.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:12 PM
  #20
Belak Attack
:walrus:
 
Belak Attack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto, Canadia.
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,096
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Belak Attack
Yeah, I'd be very tempted.

Top-6 forward, probably with a weaker value than what it should be right now, but he could rebound and play well.

A change of scenery can do wonders for a player.

That being said, would St.Louis really want (more than likely) one year of Kaberle at the stage they're at right now?

I understand the idea is to let Pietrangelo play in Peoria for a year, but St.Louis could just as easily try and let Boyes bounce back for them, and play Pietrangelo/sign a depth defenseman. I think St.Louis is going to be a good team next year, but not good enough for the Cup, so I'm not sure if they'd want a vet offensive defenseman for one year.

Belak Attack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:22 PM
  #21
sh724
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Missouri
Country: United States
Posts: 2,006
vCash: 1135
Can HF make a rule that all kaberle proposals need to be approved before they can be posted

This is about the 10th time this same proposal has been posted, each time the blues say no and will continue to say no. The blues have no need for Kaberle the blues biggest issue is offense, yes i know kaberle adds offense but is not what the blues need. STL is not going to give up one of their best goal scorers (area of weakness) for a defense men (area of strength). Also the Blues dont have a realistic chance of making a run at the cup this yr so why would they want a 1 yr rental they have a 0% chance of resigning.

sh724 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:24 PM
  #22
blue bleeder 24-7
Registered User
 
blue bleeder 24-7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Country: United States
Posts: 1,381
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belak Attack View Post
Yeah, I'd be very tempted.

Top-6 forward, probably with a weaker value than what it should be right now, but he could rebound and play well.

A change of scenery can do wonders for a player.

That being said, would St.Louis really want (more than likely) one year of Kaberle at the stage they're at right now?

I understand the idea is to let Pietrangelo play in Peoria for a year, but St.Louis could just as easily try and let Boyes bounce back for them, and play Pietrangelo/sign a depth defenseman. I think St.Louis is going to be a good team next year, but not good enough for the Cup, so I'm not sure if they'd want a vet offensive defenseman for one year.
First time I've heard that.

blue bleeder 24-7 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:30 PM
  #23
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue bleeder 24-7 View Post
First time I've heard that.
He means the idea of the proposal.

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:49 PM
  #24
2 Minute Minor
Hi Keeba!
 
2 Minute Minor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Country: United States
Posts: 5,164
vCash: 500
Value-wise, its probably not bad if there is a chance Kaberle would re-sign. Indications are that he wants an Eastern team, though, so this has to be viewed as a one year rental.

In that case, it makes little sense for the Blues:

1) It creates a hole in the "scoring winger" department which is already one of the Blues biggest needs (if not THE biggest).

2) It probably delays the development of Pietro (although I think its possible they could both fit on the roster). There is no question it would improve the Blues' defense this season...but at this point in the team's progression of rebuilding it seems dissonant.

So....no thanks. I think the Blues are pretty well set with what they've got. There is tons of cap room (although maybe not any actual money) to make in-season/deadline deals. But other than possibly another 3rd/4th line forward I don't see any more moves by the Blues. They're going to play all the young guys and see what they've got.

Finally, PLEASE stop trying to morph a semi-reasonable trade proposal into a deal for Backes. The Blues are not dealing him. I expect him to be re-signed to a long-term deal this season and named the Captain sometime before the beginning of next season (maybe as soon as this year's camp). If for some reason he was refusing to re-sign....which goes totally contrary to his character as we know it, THEN he may be a tradeable asset. But he's going to be a long-term Blue and a completely inappropriate proposal in return for a RENTAL.

2 Minute Minor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 01:58 PM
  #25
93gilmour93
Registered User
 
93gilmour93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 3,331
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blader258 View Post
That flu game was great to watch. The sens bench was dropping like flies as we came back from a 4-0 defecit to win the game. I never cried about the Leetch deal. I was just really attached to Alyn McCauley and knew Brad Boyes had 30 goal potential. If I am not mistaken didnt Nolan get hurt during that years playoff run anyway?

or was it the year after that he banged up his knee.
my wife and i were at that game sitting behind lalime. nolan in ot and the leafs fans rocked scotiabank place. {corel center then}

93gilmour93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.