HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Tor - Stl

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
08-04-2010, 02:03 PM
  #26
Ikarn Johal*
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: India
Country: India
Posts: 195
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LMFAO View Post
The blues defense is set

Johnson - Brewer
Pietriangelo - Jackman
Colaiacovo - Polak/Cole

they don't need Kaberle
Didn't Brewer sign with Florida yesterday and Pietriangelo isn't even proven himself in the nhl(I'm not saying he isn't going to be a great player). But taking all the into consideration, the blues defense is not set!

P.S. I am not saying Kaberle should be going to the blues, just saying their D isn't set.

Ikarn Johal* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 02:06 PM
  #27
BlueBeard
Registered User
 
BlueBeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Country: United States
Posts: 2,510
vCash: 500
Kaberle is a lefty correct?

So which defenseman do you want to take back so the Blues have room for Kaberle, Brewer or Jackman?

The deal doesn't sound too appetizing now does it?

BlueBeard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 02:10 PM
  #28
Elbowpad
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Edmonton, AB
Country: Canada
Posts: 94
vCash: 500
As a leaf fan, that would be a nice return for Kaberle. Boyes has the ability to score some goals, but from the Blues perspective, they're not in a position to lose Boyes goals especially since kariya left this summer too.

Elbowpad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 02:13 PM
  #29
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueBeard View Post
Kaberle is a lefty correct?

So which defenseman do you want to take back so the Blues have room for Kaberle, Brewer or Jackman?

The deal doesn't sound too appetizing now does it?
I don't know about that. Why would taking Jackman be such a bad thing? He's a useful player. Brewer is less useful, and I worry about injuries, but he's better than Finger, and might be tradeable at the deadline.

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 02:18 PM
  #30
headsigh
leave at once!
 
headsigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Atlanta
Country: Isle of Man
Posts: 9,846
vCash: 500
perhaps you should instead send Kulemin to STL for Boyes instead of Kaberle.

STL needs offense.

headsigh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 02:39 PM
  #31
All Day*
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: The Hockey Mecca
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,149
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by headsigh View Post
perhaps you should instead send Kulemin to STL for Boyes instead of Kaberle.

STL needs offense.
No way.

All Day* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 02:58 PM
  #32
trevorftw
Voice of Reason
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 340
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikarn Johal View Post
Didn't Brewer sign with Florida yesterday and Pietriangelo isn't even proven himself in the nhl(I'm not saying he isn't going to be a great player). But taking all the into consideration, the blues defense is not set!

P.S. I am not saying Kaberle should be going to the blues, just saying their D isn't set.
No. I think you're thinking of Weaver.

trevorftw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 03:27 PM
  #33
bluesfan94
#BackesforSelke
 
bluesfan94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Louis
Country: United States
Posts: 5,222
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikarn Johal View Post
Didn't Brewer sign with Florida yesterday and Pietriangelo isn't even proven himself in the nhl(I'm not saying he isn't going to be a great player). But taking all the into consideration, the blues defense is not set!

P.S. I am not saying Kaberle should be going to the blues, just saying their D isn't set.
Mike Weaver signed with Florida. Pietrangelo is supposed to be a stud. It isn't guaranteed that he will be, but he looked pretty darn good in the 18 games he has played

bluesfan94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 04:25 PM
  #34
ibleedblue8
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: St. Louis, MO
Country: United States
Posts: 264
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattVenca View Post
IMO, Bozak and Boyes are too similar. Boyes has more of a scorer's approach while Bozak is more of a playmaker, but Tyler can score and Brad can pass.
Boyes is a $4M cap hit, 4 years older, and now clogs up space at center (Bozak, Kadri, Grabovski, Mitchell, Hanson...) - His production at wing is not good enoguh for a player who's soft

If Toronto wants a center, he has to be a noticeable upgrade from Bozak and Kadri. As well, Grabovski needs to go the other way in the deal.

Kaberle for Boyes? I say no.
I believe you contradicted yourself with the bolded statements, and Boyes is a winger not a center.

Anyways, Blues pass. The Blues would be trading from their biggest need which is goal scoring and getting a d-man which they have a surplus of right now.

ibleedblue8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 04:36 PM
  #35
journeyman79
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 783
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by blue bleeder 24-7 View Post
St. Louis says no, again. I've seen this proposed about 5 times here now.

Dear Maple Leafs fans,
The Blues need scoring, not defense. You can not have Brad Boyes if your return is Tomas Kaberle. It does not address the Blues' needs.

Thanks,
Me.
this. this exactly. The Blues are offensively DESPERATE!!! for a trade to happen, BOTH teams need to be interested.

journeyman79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 04:46 PM
  #36
grabo84
Registered User
 
grabo84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Atlantic Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by journeyman79 View Post
this. this exactly. The Blues are offensively DESPERATE!!! for a trade to happen, BOTH teams need to be interested.
I blamed their miserable offense last year more on a poor transition game than anything else. You think it was just a lack of finish that was the real problem offensively for the Blues?

grabo84 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 04:54 PM
  #37
journeyman79
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 783
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by grabo84 View Post
I blamed their miserable offense last year more on a poor transition game than anything else. You think it was just a lack of finish that was the real problem offensively for the Blues?
you're right about the transition game but since it was Johnson's first year back after missing a season and because of Pietrangelo not playing a full season, I think fans would rather give that duo a shot as opposed to trading from our biggest disappointment last season (our offense) to beef up the transition.

journeyman79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 04:56 PM
  #38
Frenzy1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 3,436
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by grabo84 View Post
I blamed their miserable offense last year more on a poor transition game than anything else. You think it was just a lack of finish that was the real problem offensively for the Blues?
It wasn't the transition game that was bad for the Blues last year, but totally due to finishing. Under Murray the PP for the 1st half of the season was bottom of the league - we were getting chances, just not putting them away - the movement was really good, but they just couldn't score. Take a look at Boyes shooting %, then Berglunds, then Backes and you get the idea.

Shoot, Boyes couldn't miss a goalie if the goalie was hiding behind the net. Always right into his belly.

Frenzy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 05:35 PM
  #39
Randall Ritchey
Clutch Goal Scorer
 
Randall Ritchey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: St. Louis
Country: United States
Posts: 10,222
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ikarn Johal View Post
Didn't Brewer sign with Florida yesterday and Pietriangelo isn't even proven himself in the nhl(I'm not saying he isn't going to be a great player). But taking all the into consideration, the blues defense is not set!

P.S. I am not saying Kaberle should be going to the blues, just saying their D isn't set.
Weaver signed with Florida yesterday. And the Blues D IS set.

Not quite like what he said, but they are set. Expect to see something like this ;

Brewer - Johnson
Jackman - Polak
Colaiacovo - Pietrangelo
Strachan/Nikitin

The only way we deal for a defensemen is if he's at the AHL level or we move a defensemen as well. We have no space for Kaberle, especially at the cost of Boyes.

Randall Ritchey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 06:57 PM
  #40
bringthecuphome
Registered User
 
bringthecuphome's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 1,654
vCash: 500
I think its a good idea and its similar value, but while it feels a Leafs need, it doesn't fill the Blues need. No need to flame this one, but in the end, I doubt St. Louis fans agree.

bringthecuphome is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 07:52 PM
  #41
Schenn
Brap Braaaaaap
 
Schenn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Huron County
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,532
vCash: 238
I'd do it as a Leafs fan. I'm a fan of Boyes

Schenn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 09:33 PM
  #42
seanlinden
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 15,451
vCash: 500
This is actualy a good deal for both sides..... the problem is that as mentioned.... neither team does in its current form.

STL is short on scoring wingers (wich Boyes is now) and his 42 points are a big reason why they didn't make the playoffs. Obviusly Kaberle would elevate their transition game and make every forward they have better, but that may not be enough, and he could walk in a year. He'll prolbably also elevate teh game of Eric Brewer singificantly, and be a good mentor for Alex Pietrangelo who will most likely see spot duty this yearm. But, they are parting with a ton of offensive potential and must be prepared to acccept much less than they would've gotten offers for him a year ago.

In Toronto, 42 point Brad Boyes is definitely not the solution, but 72 point Brad Boyes would be a dann good one.... play him on a 2nd line with Versteeg on the left most likely. Problem is that they can't trade Kaberle fro a guy who who may be Lee Stempniak 2.0.

As for how they fix the deal, I think that somehow, they've gotta find a way to get Toronto a crappier puckmoving blueliner, and St. Louis a slightly crappier winger....Obviously this doesn't seem to be that possible.... but.....

What if we made this a 3-team trade hahahaha...
To SJ - Barrett Jackman, Juraj Mikus
To STL - Tomas Kaberle, Devin Setoguchi, SJ 2nd Round Pick
To TOR - Brad Boyes, Kent Hunskins, STL 1st Round Pick (Top 10 Protected)

Why Tor does it: Get a guy who has scored 40 on a bad team and had a 70 point season, is only 28 with 2 years left on his deal at $4m, a capapble NHL defenceman that allows them to move Finger to the minors (obviously prefer he wasnt in the deal, but SJ needs to clear cap). Out: Kaberle ($4.25), Mikus (.7). In: Boyes (4), Huskins (1.7). Total: +750k

Why SJ does it: Get a proven #2/3 two way defenceman while only adding $2m in salary on the blueline. Lose Seto, but he's likely replacable and now have a ton of cap space to sign Niemi and maybe bring in a guy like Stempniak. Out: Setoguchi (1.8), Huskins (1.7). In: Jackman (3.6), guy like Stempniak (1.5). Total +1.6

Why STL does it: Upgrade on a defenceman that will improve thier team immidiately, and go from Boyes to Setoguchi, a pretty significant cap savings while getting the young scoring winger they need. Even if Kaberle/Brewer walk, they haven't touched their young core, had an excellent mentor for the year (that hopefully got them into the playoffs), and a prospect defenceman that can problably play in 11-12. Plus, a ton of cap and salary space. Out: Jackman (3.6), Boyes (4). In: Kaberle (4.25), Setoguchi (1.8). Total = - 1.55

However, the Blues are on a cap, and they actually save more than this because Boyes' acctual salary is $4.5 and Jackman's is $4m. The real savings for the Blues ends up being $2.5m. this year.


Last edited by seanlinden: 08-04-2010 at 09:42 PM.
seanlinden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 10:54 PM
  #43
MeowLeafs
LM is awesome
 
MeowLeafs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Baconland
Country: Canada
Posts: 22,870
vCash: 772
I'm curious, why did Boyes have such a bad year last year?

MeowLeafs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:13 PM
  #44
Crumblin Erb Brooks
Registered User
 
Crumblin Erb Brooks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Grenyarnia
Country: United States
Posts: 2,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by KewlBum View Post
I'm curious, why did Boyes have such a bad year last year?
You guess is as good as ours. But pretty much everyone on the Blues had a disappointing season last year.

Crumblin Erb Brooks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:17 PM
  #45
TheLeastOfTheBunch
Registered User
 
TheLeastOfTheBunch's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 27,746
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Seventeen Twos View Post
lets not get carried away here.

Boyes would be a nice addition - a 1b option after kessel
Don't know about that, Boyes only had 14 goals last season. Although, alot of the Blues' forwards took a dive, scoring wise, last season.

Good proposal though, Grabo (although it hurts to know that the best return for Tomas could be a former Leaf ).

TheLeastOfTheBunch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:19 PM
  #46
EverettMike
Registered User
 
EverettMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Everett, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 11,418
vCash: 500
Not a bad offer actually.

Plus Boyes is a huge upgrade defensively over Kaberle.

:Fist pump:

EverettMike is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:30 PM
  #47
seanlinden
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 15,451
vCash: 500
Honestly....what do Blues fans think of this:

In: Kaberle, Setoguchi, 2nd round pick, defensive prospect
Out: Boyes, Jackman, 1st round pick

Alternatively....
Just send Boyes + Jackman for Kaberle + D'Amigo + Stefanovich.... and free up $4.25m in salary space to add free agents to Bolster the offence. Leafs then flip Jackman away to the highest bidder (or keep him).


Last edited by seanlinden: 08-04-2010 at 11:36 PM.
seanlinden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:36 PM
  #48
Belak Attack
:walrus:
 
Belak Attack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Toronto, Canadia.
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,096
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Belak Attack
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfried View Post
Honestly....what do Blues fans think of this:

In: Kaberle, Setoguchi, 2nd round pick, defensive prospect
Out: Boyes, Jackman, 1st round pick

Alternatively....
Just send Boyes + Jackman for Kaberle.... and free up $4.25m in salary space to add free agents to Bolster the offence. Leafs then flip Jackman away to the highest bidder (or keep him).
Where do you get Seto from?

Belak Attack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:37 PM
  #49
seanlinden
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 15,451
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Belak Attack View Post
Where do you get Seto from?
Sharks might trade Seto + Huskins + a 2nd for Jackman. They were willing to give up a 1st and 3rd for Niklas Hjalmarsson at approximately the same price...

seanlinden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-04-2010, 11:39 PM
  #50
camarodude39
Registered User
 
camarodude39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 227
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfried View Post
Honestly....what do Blues fans think of this:

In: Kaberle, Setoguchi, 2nd round pick, defensive prospect
Out: Boyes, Jackman, 1st round pick

Alternatively....
Just send Boyes + Jackman for Kaberle + D'Amigo + Stefanovich.... and free up $4.25m in salary space to add free agents to Bolster the offence. Leafs then flip Jackman away to the highest bidder (or keep him).
Not a fan. It would make the Blues better for this season, but Kaberle probably walks at the end of the season. Plus Brewer's contract is up after next season, so there is a possibility of two huge wholes in the defensive core next offseason.

camarodude39 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:52 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.