Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.
Nyr/tor/car
08-06-2010, 04:37 PM
#1
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 142
Nyr/tor/car
To rags: schenn
08-06-2010, 04:40 PM
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Red Deer, Alberta
Posts: 12,806
Why? Why would any of these teams move their young star?
08-06-2010, 04:41 PM
#3
Pete Hearts Volch
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Rocky Point
Country:
Posts: 24,125
Terrible, just terrible.
08-06-2010, 04:53 PM
#4
Global Moderator
BRING ON THE PENS
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: mtl/ott/somewhere
Country:
Posts: 27,680
you're suggesting that new york would trade staal for schenn, which is simply silly.
__________________
08-06-2010, 04:56 PM
#5
Fire Torts Hire Tort
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country:
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by
danishh
you're suggesting that new york would trade staal for schenn, which is simply silly.
you were a lot nicer than I was going to be.
08-06-2010, 05:06 PM
#6
Night on the Sun
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sullivans Island, SC
Country:
Posts: 18,677
Sorry guys I don't actually play in the NHL.
08-06-2010, 05:07 PM
#7
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,911
How does this help the teams?
08-06-2010, 05:15 PM
#8
Fire Torts Hire Tort
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country:
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leafsfuture
Schenn may have more upside than Staal
but he doesn't
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leafsfuture
As for Schenn for Sutter, Sutter has upside, but he will never be more than a 55 pt guy.
then why does he have more upside?
08-06-2010, 05:20 PM
#9
That
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Around.
Posts: 621
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leafsfuture
How does this help the teams?
?
So basically you are saying
Schenn > Staal
Schenn > Sutter
Just making sure.
08-06-2010, 05:31 PM
#10
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Toronto
Country:
Posts: 462
just brutal
08-06-2010, 06:01 PM
#11
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by
This
?
So basically you are saying
Schenn > Staal
Schenn > Sutter
Just making sure.
Wow, nice to know you can't read.
He said the Staal is more proven, but Schenn may have more upside.
So, basically, as of right now, he's saying:
Staal>Schenn.
08-06-2010, 06:06 PM
#12
Playoffs 2013
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Mississauga, ON
Country:
Posts: 9,456
Stupid for all 3 teams.
08-06-2010, 06:08 PM
#13
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 446
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leafsfuture
Schenn may have more upside than Staal, but hes still a year of development behind, and isnt as proven.
I spilled water on myself laughing at that one.
08-06-2010, 06:17 PM
#14
Registered User
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto
Country:
Posts: 315
08-06-2010, 06:18 PM
#15
Chairman Mao-rilyn
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Country:
Posts: 57,385
The Rangers give up by far the best player here. Just a LOL worthy deal.
__________________"Of course giving Sather cap space is like giving teenagers whiskey and car keys." - SBOB"Watching Sather build a team is like watching a blind man with no fingers trying to put together an elaborate puzzle." - Shadowtron
08-06-2010, 06:23 PM
#16
Whoopsie!
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NC
Country:
Posts: 325
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Erik Stall
Sorry guys I don't actually play in the NHL.
I think you were confusing Erik Stall with his brother Mark Stall.
08-06-2010, 06:41 PM
#17
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Killumbus
Country:
Posts: 10,698
Schenn does not have more upside than Staal. Even if he did, the Rangers still say no because it's not worth downgrading at the position on the basis that Schenn could become better.
08-06-2010, 06:56 PM
#18
Chairman Mao-rilyn
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Country:
Posts: 57,385
Quote:
Originally Posted by
LeafOfBread
Stupid for all 3 teams.
Not for Carolina. They run away laughing.
08-06-2010, 07:27 PM
#19
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Skipee
I spilled water on myself laughing at that one.
How? Schenn is two years younger, and at his age, Staal could only manage 2 goals and 10 points. Schenn had 5 goals. Defensively, Schenn is a more solid hitter, and has a better first pass. While Staal gets the nod in all other aspects, Schenn clearly has more to give.
I think its people like you who fail to understand how development works. Im not saying NY should trade Staal for Schenn, because if I was NY i wouldnt. What i am saying is that Luke has more potential.
08-06-2010, 07:34 PM
#20
Fire Torts Hire Tort
Join Date: Dec 2003
Country:
Posts: 9,111
Quote:
Originally Posted by
leafsfuture
What i am saying is that Luke has more potential.
we get that. that's the point we all find ridiculous.
08-06-2010, 07:39 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,844
Quote:
Originally Posted by
-31-
we get that. that's the point we all find ridiculous.
It's actually not that ridiculous to say he has more potential. I don't exactly believe Schenn will turn out to be the better player, but I do believe he has the potential to be just as good. It''s hard to say though, no one really knows how good there going to be in the future. We'll just have to wait and see.
08-06-2010, 07:55 PM
#22
Jailbait
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Bulgaria
Posts: 5,976
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jonathan.
Not for Carolina. They run away laughing.
No, actually.
Sutter is way to important. Canes say big no.
08-06-2010, 07:56 PM
#23
...
Join Date: Aug 2007
Country:
Posts: 2,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by
number11
To rags: schennstall
Oh for *******'s sake... are people STILL having a problem with this?
08-06-2010, 07:57 PM
#24
Night on the Sun
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Sullivans Island, SC
Country:
Posts: 18,677
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Jonathan.
Not for Carolina. They run away laughing.
Not exactly but who watches the Canes anyway?!
08-06-2010, 07:59 PM
#25
...
Join Date: Aug 2007
Country:
Posts: 2,907
Quote:
Originally Posted by
caniacho
No, actually.
M.Staal >> B.Sutter... now and in the future.
Also, D is Carolina's most pressing need. You're just arguing to the contrary because your ego is too big to admit the glaring value gap. Get real.
Thread Tools
Search this Thread
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:25 PM .
monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
