Magnus Nyström should not be in this sort of thread imo.
He's a decent writer and I used to like him more, but it irritates me to no end the way he goes on his "cleaning up the game" crusades. This isn't floorball damnit, and neither Hedman nor Ekman did anything remotely close to a "Bertuzzi" even if that's the impression you get from reading Nyström's articles.
Expressen is a lot better for hockey than Aftonbladet though. I think Nordström is decent too. And Boorken at times.
Originally Posted by birden
Ros he isn't really so bad there are journalist that are far worse same thing with Wennerholm. Mats Wennerholm imo he does a good work, but his blog is really bad. I can aggre on that Lasse Anrell in his own league when it comes to jorunalism, oh man he is so bad.
I can't stand any of them. Bjurman has his niche and is quite funny though.
The thing about Bjurman is that he isn't trying to prove he knows the most about hockey in the world like the rest, neither does he write about things he know squat about(like Wennerholm). He's writing to his readers and has created a blog worth following because of it(I'm not following it regularly but I can appreciate it), and doesn't try to start controversy or provoke which is the only thing that Ros does.
I have no idea if Wennerholm is doing the headlines to his blog, but if he does he's truly a moron. I've never seen a headline of his actually reflecting what he's about to write, just pure attention seeking. He also doesn't let comments into his blog making it a complete waste of internet.