Today he mentioned Frolov coming to Montreal due to the chemistry he and Cammo had in LA. He would fill a size need, but I'm not sure what the Rangers would want in return. Any takers?
He makes 3 mil and is on pace for 30 points, he would have to be just about free.
The guy is doing squat with the Rangers but we should get him and stick him on our top line...priceless!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxpac
A.K for Frolov? It' about 3.5 extra mil less on the cap come july 1st...
That would be a dumb trade. AK has no cap hit beyond this year he is a RFA. So we trade AK for a guy that's a lot les physical and less productive...brilliant!
Let's call Calgary and see if we can get Stajan for Plekanec while we're at it!
Ek has Arnott to Habs e4. I'm kinda glad because I would hate to have him here, all he does is fill a size need, but hes slow and can't keep up with our fast paced team. As a 3rd liner yes, but at 4.5 mil no.
I do however feel however Gauthier is targeting David Clarkson. He is the perfect 3rd liner with hands that the Habs need and Gauthier is in the market to find a 3rd liner, and I think Clarkson can come cheaper then usual.
Ek has Arnott to Habs e4. I'm kinda glad because I would hate to have him here, all he does is fill a size need, but hes slow and can't keep up with our fast paced team. As a 3rd liner yes, but at 4.5 mil no.
I do however feel however Gauthier is targeting David Clarkson. He is the perfect 3rd liner with hands that the Habs need and Gauthier is in the market to find a 3rd liner, and I think Clarkson can come cheaper then usual.
I'd be alright with Arnott so long as the price is relatively low, like a bottom-end prospect and a mid-round pick. We could use a big-body NHL center for the 3rd line, or 2nd line should something happen to Pleks or G-Love. Depends entirely on the circumstances, the date of the trade, and what we are giving up.
Clarkson would be great though, he is definitely a hard-nosed player we could really use.
