HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Central Division > Colorado Avalanche
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

2012 Winter Classic?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-01-2011, 09:18 PM
  #1
S E P H
@Krzysztof_WHL
 
S E P H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Avs Country!
Country: Poland
Posts: 5,155
vCash: 500
2012 Winter Classic?

During the 2nd intermission on CBC during the Hot Stove, Pierre Lebrun was mentioning that Philadelphia is the front runner for the next winter classic with Colorado being the 2nd. I'm pretty sure it will be at Invesco Field, so if we do get the 2012 Winter classic which team would you want to see and which jersey would you want the Avs to wear?

I would say Detroit would be team, but I would love to see Vancouver or a Eastern team like Montrčal or Philly.

As for the jerseys I would love to see a new blue retro style Nordiques jersey with a Avs logo or maybe the Colorado Rockies style with Avs logos.

S E P H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:12 PM
  #2
The Kingslayer
Registered User
 
The Kingslayer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Yuck horse piss!
Country: Cambodia
Posts: 23,448
vCash: 966
Very surprised and excited to hear that on CBC aswell. The teams I want to see the Avs play:

Detroit, Montreal, Vancouver, Toronto

The Kingslayer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:16 PM
  #3
Helton4Hall
Internet Charlatan
 
Helton4Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Storming the Gates
Country: South Korea
Posts: 19,370
vCash: 500
I would love to see it here. And i want to play Detroit. No-one else.

Helton4Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:23 PM
  #4
RockLobster
Moderator
Beatles Guru
 
RockLobster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Kansas
Country: Germany
Posts: 13,049
vCash: 500
I bet that if Colorado gets it, the two teams playing would be...

Pittsburgh vs. Washington w/ The Avalanche players serving as Refs/Linesmen and Waterboys

RockLobster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:24 PM
  #5
chagopian
Registered User
 
chagopian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Markham, Canada
Country: Armenia
Posts: 790
vCash: 500
I'd love to play Detroit, but I'm slightly scared they'd pit us against Minnesota... Vancouver would be acceptable though

chagopian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:25 PM
  #6
Helton4Hall
Internet Charlatan
 
Helton4Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Storming the Gates
Country: South Korea
Posts: 19,370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chagopian View Post
I'd love to play Detroit, but I'm slightly scared they'd pit us against Minnesota... Vancouver would be acceptable though
They would never put a boring ass team on the WC like Minny.

Helton4Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:28 PM
  #7
chagopian
Registered User
 
chagopian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Markham, Canada
Country: Armenia
Posts: 790
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jailbait View Post
They would never put a boring ass team on the WC like Minny.
Buffalo and Boston were not exciting teams to watch when they played in the Winter Classic

chagopian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 10:31 PM
  #8
NHL33*
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: New York
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 7,873
vCash: 500
Vancouver.

If not them (Canadian team), maybe the Kings.


Last edited by NHL33*: 01-01-2011 at 10:51 PM.
NHL33* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 11:29 PM
  #9
The Situation
 
The Situation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 700
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chagopian View Post
Buffalo and Boston were not exciting teams to watch when they played in the Winter Classic
Even boring teams like Buffalo and Boston are 10 times more exciting than the Wild.

The Situation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 11:38 PM
  #10
Helton4Hall
Internet Charlatan
 
Helton4Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Storming the Gates
Country: South Korea
Posts: 19,370
vCash: 500
ice was terribad out there.

Meanwhile in Denver....

-6 F

make it happen bettman.

Helton4Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 11:53 PM
  #11
Granlund2Pulkkinen*
New Kid on the Block
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Country: South Africa
Posts: 39,942
vCash: 500
Detroit just for the "marketing" aspect.

They'd probably wear their old burgundy uniforms...

These


Or some variation with that color

Granlund2Pulkkinen* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 11:55 PM
  #12
Zih
Dater's Gonna Hate
 
Zih's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 2,306
vCash: 133
I can't imagine they'd have it in Denver; there's a good chance it'd be a disaster. You're more likely to have 60 degree weather than below freezing weather.

Zih is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-01-2011, 11:57 PM
  #13
Bonzai12
Registered User
 
Bonzai12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver CO
Country: United States
Posts: 7,091
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Bonzai12
I would think it would have to be Detroit because of the rivalry.

I can't see Vancouver although it makes sense - two western teams playing in a classic would not bring the ratings. It'd have to be Detroit or an Eastern Conference team.

Bonzai12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:04 AM
  #14
The Situation
 
The Situation's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 700
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zih View Post
I can't imagine they'd have it in Denver; there's a good chance it'd be a disaster. You're more likely to have 60 degree weather than below freezing weather.
Just have the game at night.

The Situation is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:06 AM
  #15
madman
Deadmarsh Deli Dills
 
madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Steamboat Springs
Country: United States
Posts: 2,026
vCash: 500
Coors Field would be a FANTASTIC venue for the Winter Classic.

madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:11 AM
  #16
S E P H
@Krzysztof_WHL
 
S E P H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Avs Country!
Country: Poland
Posts: 5,155
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by madman View Post
Coors Field would be a FANTASTIC venue for the Winter Classic.
How so? Compared to Invesco Field.

S E P H is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:12 AM
  #17
Granlund2Pulkkinen*
New Kid on the Block
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Country: South Africa
Posts: 39,942
vCash: 500
They alternate conferences so it won't be Phili...

I'm very ecstatic...

Granlund2Pulkkinen* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:14 AM
  #18
Bonzai12
Registered User
 
Bonzai12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Denver CO
Country: United States
Posts: 7,091
vCash: 500
Send a message via Yahoo to Bonzai12
Quote:
Originally Posted by madman View Post
Coors Field would be a FANTASTIC venue for the Winter Classic.
It would be - but Invesco has like 20,000 more seats. But I agree Coors Field would be a better place. Downtown and just more nostalgic.

Bonzai12 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:15 AM
  #19
StanGetz*
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Country: Liechtenstein
Posts: 4,440
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by S E P H View Post
How so? Compared to Invesco Field.
Coors is a much more beautiful and intimate setting for something like that. Invesco wouldn't feel right imo.

StanGetz* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:18 AM
  #20
Granlund2Pulkkinen*
New Kid on the Block
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Country: South Africa
Posts: 39,942
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlh61 View Post
Coors is a much more beautiful and intimate setting for something like that. Invesco wouldn't feel right imo.
Invesco would hold more.

But Baseball Stadiums are more square so there wouldn't be a "bad" seat.

Granlund2Pulkkinen* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:22 AM
  #21
Mant*
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,911
vCash: 500
I have serious doubts that it'll be Colorado in 2012... NHL doesn't give much of a **** about the western conference, and it gives less of a **** about western conference teams that are rebuilding. If it comes out west again it'll probably be Detroit, Dallas, or San Jose. Hell, I'd guess they'd put Minnesota higher on the list just because of that fanbase.

Mant* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:23 AM
  #22
StanGetz*
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Boulder, CO
Country: Liechtenstein
Posts: 4,440
vCash: 500
Personally I think the "holds more" argument shouldn't be in play. Coors is right in the middle of downtown and would provide a much better atmosphere than the monster invesco. I've just never been a huge fan of rinks on football fields. Either way if we actually got a wc, it would be sick as hell

StanGetz* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:24 AM
  #23
Mant*
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,911
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mlh61 View Post
Coors is a much more beautiful and intimate setting for something like that. Invesco wouldn't feel right imo.
Falcon Stadium at the Air Force Academy would be far more impressive than Invesco.

Mant* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:28 AM
  #24
Helton4Hall
Internet Charlatan
 
Helton4Hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Storming the Gates
Country: South Korea
Posts: 19,370
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aittokallio View Post
Detroit just for the "marketing" aspect.

They'd probably wear their old burgundy uniforms...

These


Or some variation with that color
Nord uni's plz.

If your going for sheer scenery, Folsom would probably be the way to go.

FWIW, If colorado and detroit played, the Big House would probably be the preferred venue, IMO.

Helton4Hall is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-02-2011, 12:29 AM
  #25
madman
Deadmarsh Deli Dills
 
madman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Steamboat Springs
Country: United States
Posts: 2,026
vCash: 500
Okay, let's run with this for a bit.

Coors Field:
-Advantages: Great, classic architecture. Aesthetically beautiful. Located downtown in a similarly styled, business-oriented part of town (LoDo) = greater impact on surrounding businesses and projecting the "image" of the city. Baseball stadium = unique sight lines. Flexibility with venue use (aka, nobody using the place 'til March).
-Disadvantages: Limited attendance capacity (but see Wrigley, Fenway in prior years).

Invesco:
-Advantages: Greatest attendance capactiy. Football stadium = consistent sight lines for rink view. "Mile High" name attached to stadium (albeit poorly).
-Disadvantages: Location (Federal). Lack of proximity to surrounding businesses/attractions/anything nice. Bland styling. Silly Broncos logo in seats. Potential scheduling conflicts.

In my mind, Coors > Invesco 100% of the time.

If we were talking about the real Mile High Stadium, this would be a whole different debate.

madman is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:50 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.