HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The History of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The History of Hockey Relive great moments in hockey history and discuss how the game has changed over time.

Best enforcer of all-time (based on peak)

View Poll Results: Who is the best enforcer of all-time (based on peak)?
John Feguson 4 4.26%
Dave Schultz 8 8.51%
Tiger Williams 4 4.26%
Clark Gillies 3 3.19%
Bob Probert 54 57.45%
Dave Brown 11 11.70%
Troy Crowder 1 1.06%
Stu Grimson 0 0%
Tony Twist 8 8.51%
Donald Brashear 1 1.06%
Tie Domi 0 0%
Georges Laraque 0 0%
Derek Boogaard 0 0%
Voters: 94. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
01-25-2011, 11:19 AM
  #1
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Best enforcer of all-time (based on peak)

Who is the best enforcer of all-time, based on peak (not longevity, etc.)

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 12:08 PM
  #2
jkrx
Registered User
 
jkrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,337
vCash: 500
This is a hard one as Kocur and Probert were scary together (not that they werent scary alone). I think O'reilly should be mentioned though. He was downright scary but I guess my vote goes to Schultz.

jkrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 12:09 PM
  #3
Psycho Papa Joe
Porkchop Hoser
 
Psycho Papa Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Cesspool, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 23,351
vCash: 500
Based on the list, Clark Gillies, but I'm not sure if he fought enough to really be considered an enforcer. He was one of the toughest players in the league, could fight and was a hell of a hockey player.

For a guy who fought alot, nobody was better than peak level Probert amongst players I've seen.

Terry O'Reilly should be on this list as well.

Psycho Papa Joe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 12:15 PM
  #4
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Just to clarify -- I don't mean "best" as is "most talented player". I mean, who was the best fighter/champ at their peak? Or, if all of these dudes had a battle royal when they were at the absolute peak as a fighter, who is the best? Not that you guys were confused, just wanted to clarify in case.

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 12:18 PM
  #5
jkrx
Registered User
 
jkrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,337
vCash: 500
I understood and I think Schultz might have a very marginal upper hand in this. Gillies is no slouch either but I believe both Probert and Kocur had better peak than him.

The top 4 would be O'Reilly, Schultz, Kocur and Probert.

Edit: How can we forget Semenko? So add him to the top 5.

jkrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 12:22 PM
  #6
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
j,

I should have included Terry on the list. Huge oversight on my part. Not that I think he was the baddest dude ever, but he certainly warrants a top spot. I voted Twist over Probert and Brown. When Twist was in his hayday, his knockout punch rivaled Kocur and he was more feared than anyone I could remember. Dudes just did not want to fight him at all costs.

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 12:26 PM
  #7
jkrx
Registered User
 
jkrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gustafsson View Post
j,

I should have included Terry on the list. Huge oversight on my part. Not that I think he was the baddest dude ever, but he certainly warrants a top spot. I voted Twist over Probert and Brown. When Twist was in his hayday, his knockout punch rivaled Kocur and he was more feared than anyone I could remember. Dudes just did not want to fight him at all costs.
Well, he was feared I agree but remember, Kocur and Probert were feared long after their peaks.

Even whole benches screamed for their cocky young fighters to not drop the gloves with Kocur for example.

jkrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 01:27 PM
  #8
Ogie Goldthorpe
Piloted Ogre Hog
 
Ogie Goldthorpe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NS via BC
Posts: 2,841
vCash: 500
I don't get the Dave Schultz love. Sure, he was probably the most active enforcer at his peak, but he also fought (and/or jumped) a lot of not so tough guys. Any time he would tangle with a real mean opponent (and I'll grant, he would take on anyone), if Schultz started getting the worst of it, a bunch of other Flyers would pile on.

Probert got my vote, but most of the other guys on the list would be decent selections too. Chris Nilan, Orland Kurtenbach and Jim McKenzie are also worth mentioning.

Ogie Goldthorpe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 02:10 PM
  #9
seventieslord
Moderator
 
seventieslord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,243
vCash: 500
As an enforcer specifically? As in, just based on raw fighting ability? God, there are so many, and with the way fighting developed in the 90s and beyond, you have to compare relatively too, I think.

I think most people would be partial to John Ferguson.

Then you had Dave Brown, Bob Probert, Tony Twist, and then Georges Laraque... I don't even want to call Boogaard an enforcer... I don't know what he is. I think you have to somewhat be a hockey player to be an enforcer.

I didn't see there was a poll... looks like you named everyone that came to mind.

Based on fights I've seen, anecdotes and recorded W/L records... I think I have to go with Brown.

seventieslord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 02:10 PM
  #10
seventieslord
Moderator
 
seventieslord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Regina, SK
Country: Canada
Posts: 26,243
vCash: 500
Were Schultz and Williams THAT tough? Seems to me they get extra credit for just being the most frequent fighters.

seventieslord is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 02:21 PM
  #11
Ogopogo*
 
Ogopogo*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,214
vCash: 500
Check Dave Brown's Edmonton years on You Tube. He pummelled many tough guys into the ice - it was amazing how badly he beat down other enforcers.

Ogopogo* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 02:24 PM
  #12
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Dave Brown was a bad, BAD man in his day. I once saw Brownie on the concourse in the Spectrum, and after a few beers, said to him, "Hey Brownie, you don't look so bad considering all the fights you've been in." His reply with a straight face, "I didn't lose much."

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 02:28 PM
  #13
jkrx
Registered User
 
jkrx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by seventieslord View Post
Were Schultz and Williams THAT tough? Seems to me they get extra credit for just being the most frequent fighters.
Schultz were tough and I really hated that guy but even I have to admit that he was an absolute beast when it came to fighting in his peak. Atleast thats what I remember. I found Tiger to be an overrated fighter though.

jkrx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 02:28 PM
  #14
begbeee
Registered User
 
begbeee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Slovakia
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 4,124
vCash: 500
I will go with Probert (best from previous generation) and Laraque (best from last generation).
My HM is Brown.

begbeee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 03:05 PM
  #15
Lexus
OWN THE MOMENT.
 
Lexus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Country: Norway
Posts: 3,084
vCash: 500
Im torn, so no voting for me..
a tie between these two. (I think 'Taz' had more raw skill out of the two though)






Lexus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 03:08 PM
  #16
CuteHockeyBunny
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal
Country: Yugoslavia
Posts: 1,113
vCash: 500
Wait, are you asking who is the best fighter or who was the best at going bat**** insane and defending his teammates? I'd pick Laraque over a lot of those guys as a fighter but as an enforcer? He'd be close to dead last.

CuteHockeyBunny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 03:26 PM
  #17
LeBlondeDemon10
BlindLemon Haystacks
 
LeBlondeDemon10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,176
vCash: 500
I think there needs to be a distinction made between enforcer and fighter. This would separate the Clark Gillies' from the Dave Schulz's. Schultz was a fighter not an enforcer. Gillies was an enforcer, not a fighter. The difference? Enforcers do not fight as much as the fighters. They contribute more to the team than just riding shotgun. Their reputation is such that their presence on the ice/game is enough to keep things under control. The mere threat of having to deal with the enforcer has an effect on its own. The first player to come to mind for me was Larry Robinson. He was an enforcer. He fought his fair share of fights early in his career. After he pounded Schultz to a pulp he wasn't challenged as much. His mere presence in the game was enough to stop other players from taking cheap shots at Lafleur, Shutt, etc...I would make similar arguments for Gillies, O'Reilly, Probert and Wendel Clark to name a few. Thoughts?

LeBlondeDemon10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 03:30 PM
  #18
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeBlondeDemon10 View Post
I think there needs to be a distinction made between enforcer and fighter. This would separate the Clark Gillies' from the Dave Schulz's. Schultz was a fighter not an enforcer. Gillies was an enforcer, not a fighter. The difference? Enforcers do not fight as much as the fighters. They contribute more to the team than just riding shotgun. Their reputation is such that their presence on the ice/game is enough to keep things under control. The mere threat of having to deal with the enforcer has an effect on its own. The first player to come to mind for me was Larry Robinson. He was an enforcer. He fought his fair share of fights early in his career. After he pounded Schultz to a pulp he wasn't challenged as much. His mere presence in the game was enough to stop other players from taking cheap shots at Lafleur, Shutt, etc...I would make similar arguments for Gillies, O'Reilly, Probert and Wendel Clark to name a few. Thoughts?
Good question. In this case, let's say "fighter". I am taking the "role" of the enforcer and the psychodynamics out of the equation. Who was the toughest, nastiest, SOB out of these guys when they were all at their best?

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 03:57 PM
  #19
ToddRundgren
A Wizard A True Star
 
ToddRundgren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somerville MA
Country: United States
Posts: 13,349
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeBlondeDemon10 View Post
I think there needs to be a distinction made between enforcer and fighter. This would separate the Clark Gillies' from the Dave Schulz's. Schultz was a fighter not an enforcer. Gillies was an enforcer, not a fighter. The difference? Enforcers do not fight as much as the fighters. They contribute more to the team than just riding shotgun. Their reputation is such that their presence on the ice/game is enough to keep things under control. The mere threat of having to deal with the enforcer has an effect on its own. The first player to come to mind for me was Larry Robinson. He was an enforcer. He fought his fair share of fights early in his career. After he pounded Schultz to a pulp he wasn't challenged as much. His mere presence in the game was enough to stop other players from taking cheap shots at Lafleur, Shutt, etc...I would make similar arguments for Gillies, O'Reilly, Probert and Wendel Clark to name a few. Thoughts?
Is this really true? That's an honest question, BTW. There are so many debates about cheap shots and guys to act as deterrents. Was Robinson's presence really enough to make other guys think twice? Was this unique to him and maybe Semenko? Was it also a product of the era? Because there are guys in the league today who you would think would act as "deterrents" but I don't think they do.

__________________
Dusk At Cubist Castle
ToddRundgren is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 04:28 PM
  #20
connellc
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 233
vCash: 500
there is not enough Tony Twist in this thread. He was the most feared fighter I have ever seen.

connellc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 05:12 PM
  #21
Boxscore
#oldNHL
 
Boxscore's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: 1974-94
Posts: 6,301
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by connellc View Post
there is not enough Tony Twist in this thread. He was the most feared fighter I have ever seen.
I agree, and I voted Twist. People wanted no parts of him. He killed dudes.

Boxscore is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 05:28 PM
  #22
jcbio11
Registered User
 
jcbio11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Bratislava
Country: Slovakia
Posts: 2,135
vCash: 50
Let's be reality here for a second, "best enforcer" is an oxymoron.

jcbio11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 05:34 PM
  #23
kmad
Riot Survivor
 
kmad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 33,276
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jcbio11 View Post
Let's be reality
Please end this.

kmad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 06:08 PM
  #24
MXD
Registered User
 
MXD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 23,741
vCash: 500
In my books, Dave Brown.

Laraque has claim as well.

Certainly NOT Dave Schutlz.

Some great fighters can't be voted fore. Barry Beck and Serge Savard comes to mind.

MXD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
01-25-2011, 06:10 PM
  #25
Chumley
 
Chumley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Victoria, B.C.
Country: Canada
Posts: 133
vCash: 500
Bob Probert. Schultz and Semenko second.

Chumley is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:53 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.