HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Clowe to Canucks

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
02-04-2011, 12:04 AM
  #1
CandiedBacon
Seguin and Hamilton
 
CandiedBacon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: EpicMealTime
Country: Canada
Posts: 355
vCash: 500
Clowe to Canucks

Need someone to round out the Top-6. If San Jose feels that they are seriously out of contention for the cup how about something like Samuelsson+Top Prospect+2nd

CandiedBacon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:23 AM
  #2
Hi-wayman
Registered User
 
Hi-wayman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,185
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewDoughty8 View Post
Need someone to round out the Top-6. If San Jose feels that they are seriously out of contention for the cup how about something like Samuelsson+Top Prospect+2nd
The Canucks would not be a better team after such a trade.

Clowe lacks the speed to play on the Kesler line and is too expensive to replace Torres on the 3rd. On top of that you give away far too much to a rival conference team to get him. That would be similar to the Ehrhoff trade in reverse.

Hi-wayman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:24 AM
  #3
Winroba
Keep Calm, Kassi On
 
Winroba's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,083
vCash: 500
Would be nice but won't happen.

Winroba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:24 AM
  #4
Mafoofoo
Hockey
 
Mafoofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 11,102
vCash: 500
Clowe to Vancouver? Hahahahaha no.

Mafoofoo is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:25 AM
  #5
hockeyball
HFBoards Sponsor
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,076
vCash: 500
Sharks are in a playoff spot right now and have won the last 6 out of 7 games (and 13 of 14 points).

We are very much in the playoffs, I will be shocked if we don't make it. Team is just too talented not to. We will be buyers, not sellers.

Clowe isn't going anywhere anyway, we'd want Ehrhoff or Edler, which makes you a worse team too.

hockeyball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:28 AM
  #6
LostMyGlasses*
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Simon Fraser
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,431
vCash: 500
Wilson would be out of his mind to deal with Gillis when the two could meet in the playoffs.


Last edited by LostMyGlasses*: 02-04-2011 at 12:35 AM.
LostMyGlasses* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:37 AM
  #7
carlweezer*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 1,157
vCash: 500
The Sharks would want , Ehrhoff or Bieksa in return...I can see them also asking for Connauton, a big solid puck moving dman that can put up a ton of points! exactly what the sharks need at the moment..

carlweezer* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:56 AM
  #8
WTFetus
Registered User
 
WTFetus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Francisco
Country: United States
Posts: 10,521
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman View Post
That would be similar to the Ehrhoff trade in reverse.
Traded Ehrhoff for a bag of pucks. Last I checked, Clowe is not a bag of pucks.

WTFetus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 01:43 AM
  #9
TmX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 65
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post

Clowe isn't going anywhere anyway, we'd want Ehrhoff or Edler, which makes you a worse team too.
Should of thought about it before you traded him for practically nothing.There is no way the Canucks are going to let either of these guys go.

I don't see why people propose to trade Samuelsson? He has been lights out last playoffs and I am sure he will be clutch again this year!
Canucks' forwards pick up his slack for now therefore there is no need for more offence.
The Canucks should not worry about scoring the most goals during the regular season they need to worry about preforming in the playoffs and Samuelsson has proven that he can preform in the playoffs.

TmX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 01:47 AM
  #10
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 23,475
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman View Post
The Canucks would not be a better team after such a trade.

Clowe lacks the speed to play on the Kesler line and is too expensive to replace Torres on the 3rd. On top of that you give away far too much to a rival conference team to get him. That would be similar to the Ehrhoff trade in reverse.
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 02:11 AM
  #11
Cogburn
Velocitas Eradico
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,452
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
You clearly have no idea what you're talking about.
Short version: The Canucks trading for Clowe, with his asking price being at an all time high, for what his role, and likely chemistry on this team, would be on this team would be, doesn't make sense.

Long version:Clowe is a valuable player, and would be an improvement on our roster the way he is playing. Kesler is faster then Clowe, and he, over the past few seasons, has been able to create chemistry with very, very fast skaters, the Hansens, Tambellinis, Shirokovs and Raymonds of this team. With those players available for him to play with, I don't know that even Clowe could simply step into one of the roles that those four mentioned seem to provide as speedsters. Clowe, with his style of play, would be more in line with Malhotra, Samuelsson or Torres. NOT IN TERMS OF SKILL, but rather in terms of the style of play I have watched Clowe play.

I like Clowe, and for the kind of damage he'd do to the opposition, he shouldn't play on the third line here. Also, he would be very expensive in that role, and while I would love a line with Kesler and Clowe, changing the type of game Kesler and his linemates play, it could cause chaos messing with a winning formula there at this point in the season. Other players are more suitable for our second line, and the price of acquiring Clowe, especially considering the trade history between the two teams and the likelyhood of a Sharks-Canucks playoff series, let alone his cap hit here, combines into a mess for Vancouver.

Clowe is no slow poke, but he is also no Raymond.

Cogburn is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 02:16 AM
  #12
Meganuck*
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Vancouver,BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 11,036
vCash: 500
Clowe is one of the most important players on the Sharks. I doubt he gets moved. Better chance of Thornton being moved than him.

Meganuck* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 02:48 AM
  #13
sharkohol
only posts drunk
 
sharkohol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Country: United States
Posts: 4,574
vCash: 500
Stat line this year for Ryane:

14G, 27A, 41P, +6 (relatively amazing with the awful D that the sharks have), 69 PIMs, 96 hits.

Yeah, a Samuelsson / Clowe swap (Clowe outscoring Sammy by 10 points in 3 less games, btw) would totally be the Ehrhoff trade, right?

And don't try to rationalize that hilariously inane comment.

Clowe ain't leaving. Guy is future captain material and a stark contrast to the cavalier attitudes of the big three. If the Sharks are adding players, draft picks, prospect goalies, and forwards that are getting pushed out (Seto, McGinn, et al) will be dealt.

EDIT: Ah - there is a 'top prospect' and a 2nd included.

Real life GMs don't value top prospects and late 2nd rounders as much as HFers do. Trust me.

sharkohol is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 04:24 AM
  #14
mstad101
Registered User
 
mstad101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 2,246
vCash: 500
Mike Gillis does. Gillis is building a consistent contender, a team that's always capable of winning it all.
He values development a lot, and with our structure, Clowe just doesn't fit without moving a crucial piece due to his aforementioned high value to the Sharks.
I think we'd be better off not dealing within conference to a direct Playoff rival matchup.

mstad101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 06:14 AM
  #15
luiginb
Registered User
 
luiginb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 575
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman View Post
Clowe lacks the speed to play on the Kesler line and is too expensive to replace Torres on the 3rd.
Kesler line, third line?? Slot him in with the Sedins, sit back and enjoy the show. It would take Edler and Torres for him though.

luiginb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 06:45 AM
  #16
Dusk Soldier
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,034
vCash: 500
Following historical precedence, it would probably take a 3rd round draft pick.

Dusk Soldier is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 08:16 AM
  #17
Pinkfloyd
Registered User
 
Pinkfloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Roseville
Country: United States
Posts: 23,475
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cogburn View Post
Short version: The Canucks trading for Clowe, with his asking price being at an all time high, for what his role, and likely chemistry on this team, would be on this team would be, doesn't make sense.

Long version:Clowe is a valuable player, and would be an improvement on our roster the way he is playing. Kesler is faster then Clowe, and he, over the past few seasons, has been able to create chemistry with very, very fast skaters, the Hansens, Tambellinis, Shirokovs and Raymonds of this team. With those players available for him to play with, I don't know that even Clowe could simply step into one of the roles that those four mentioned seem to provide as speedsters. Clowe, with his style of play, would be more in line with Malhotra, Samuelsson or Torres. NOT IN TERMS OF SKILL, but rather in terms of the style of play I have watched Clowe play.

I like Clowe, and for the kind of damage he'd do to the opposition, he shouldn't play on the third line here. Also, he would be very expensive in that role, and while I would love a line with Kesler and Clowe, changing the type of game Kesler and his linemates play, it could cause chaos messing with a winning formula there at this point in the season. Other players are more suitable for our second line, and the price of acquiring Clowe, especially considering the trade history between the two teams and the likelyhood of a Sharks-Canucks playoff series, let alone his cap hit here, combines into a mess for Vancouver.

Clowe is no slow poke, but he is also no Raymond.
Skating speed is irrelevant here. Clowe plays fast because he moves the puck fast and intelligently. Just because Kesler has speed and can play well with other guys who showcase skating speed doesn't mean that Clowe can't play with Kesler. That's a ridiculous assumption to make. The guys that know how to move the puck quickly are always going to play faster than the guys who rely on their skating speed. I simply do not see how Kesler's game has to change just because he would play with Clowe and you could still have a Raymond or a Shirokov on the other wing.

You can rationalize why trading for Clowe would not be wise due to the pieces needed to go the other way or his cap hit or the lack of desire to trade with a competitor. However, saying he wouldn't fit on either of the Canucks top two lines or would force a change in how someone plays is ridiculous.

Pinkfloyd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 09:17 AM
  #18
tony d
Ottawa Senators
 
tony d's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Behind A Tree
Country: Canada
Posts: 24,967
vCash: 500
San Jose is in the midst of their strongest streak all season, no way do they trade a player who has been playing well for them all season.

tony d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 10:34 AM
  #19
magic school bus
YOU CAN READ
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 10,275
vCash: 500
Ehrhoff or Edler would have to be in the trade (maybe Bieksa).. and for the OP, that "top prospect" better be Cody Hodgson.

magic school bus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 10:50 AM
  #20
bigwillie
Registered User
 
bigwillie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Humboldt
Country: United States
Posts: 5,396
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to bigwillie
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman View Post
The Canucks would not be a better team after such a trade.

Clowe lacks the speed to play on the Kesler line and is too expensive to replace Torres on the 3rd. On top of that you give away far too much to a rival conference team to get him. That would be similar to the Ehrhoff trade in reverse.
Samuelsson + prospect + 2nd = top-2 defenseman

Clowe = 2 prospects likely to never make it to the NHL

What?

bigwillie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 11:20 AM
  #21
Arkansas Shark
Shanabaned
 
Arkansas Shark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Arkansawww/NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 2,962
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DrewDoughty8 View Post
Need someone to round out the Top-6. If San Jose feels that they are seriously out of contention for the cup how about something like Samuelsson+Top Prospect+2nd
The Sharks are 5th in the West. Why on earth would DW want to start dismantling the top 6, much less Ryane Clowe?

The only way the Canucks touch him is if Ehrhoff or Edler is coming to San Jose, which will not happen.

Why would the Sharks want an aging Samuelson, low 2nd and a "Top" prospect that I would be pushed to believe is not named Shroeder?

Arkansas Shark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 11:45 AM
  #22
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,288
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hi-wayman View Post
The Canucks would not be a better team after such a trade.

Clowe lacks the speed to play on the Kesler line and is too expensive to replace Torres on the 3rd. On top of that you give away far too much to a rival conference team to get him. That would be similar to the Ehrhoff trade in reverse.
You clearly are unfamiliar with Ryan Clowe. He's one of the best players in San Jose.

There's no way the Sharks would give him to Vancouver for anything short of a gross overpayment. Samuelsson + draft picks would not even come close to getting it done.

__________________
I told ya so. I was right all along!
y2kcanucks is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:00 PM
  #23
hockeyball
HFBoards Sponsor
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 15,076
vCash: 500
This thread is dumb. It should stop.

hockeyball is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 12:16 PM
  #24
LostMyGlasses*
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Simon Fraser
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,431
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
Skating speed is irrelevant here. Clowe plays fast because he moves the puck fast and intelligently. Just because Kesler has speed and can play well with other guys who showcase skating speed doesn't mean that Clowe can't play with Kesler. That's a ridiculous assumption to make. The guys that know how to move the puck quickly are always going to play faster than the guys who rely on their skating speed. I simply do not see how Kesler's game has to change just because he would play with Clowe and you could still have a Raymond or a Shirokov on the other wing.

You can rationalize why trading for Clowe would not be wise due to the pieces needed to go the other way or his cap hit or the lack of desire to trade with a competitor. However, saying he wouldn't fit on either of the Canucks top two lines or would force a change in how someone plays is ridiculous.
This is pretty much bang on. The Canucks need a player like Clowe to round out their top 6, but Clowe is much to valuable to the Sharks to be traded. The Canucks won't need 3 speedy players on one line in the playoffs, they are better off spreading that speed out and giving Kesler some help down low and on the boards.

Just for ***** and giggles, I like the idea of throwing Clowe out with the Sedins and moving Burrows to the second line-he's had success with Kesler in the past.

Sedin Sedin Clowe

Raymond Kesler Burrows

More realistic is the Canucks targeting a fourth line center or a 'Clowe-lite', whoever that may be.

LostMyGlasses* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-04-2011, 01:50 PM
  #25
Cogburn
Velocitas Eradico
 
Cogburn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,452
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinkfloyd View Post
Skating speed is irrelevant here. Clowe plays fast because he moves the puck fast and intelligently. Just because Kesler has speed and can play well with other guys who showcase skating speed doesn't mean that Clowe can't play with Kesler. That's a ridiculous assumption to make. The guys that know how to move the puck quickly are always going to play faster than the guys who rely on their skating speed. I simply do not see how Kesler's game has to change just because he would play with Clowe and you could still have a Raymond or a Shirokov on the other wing.

You can rationalize why trading for Clowe would not be wise due to the pieces needed to go the other way or his cap hit or the lack of desire to trade with a competitor. However, saying he wouldn't fit on either of the Canucks top two lines or would force a change in how someone plays is ridiculous.
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostMyGlasses View Post
This is pretty much bang on. The Canucks need a player like Clowe to round out their top 6, but Clowe is much to valuable to the Sharks to be traded. The Canucks won't need 3 speedy players on one line in the playoffs, they are better off spreading that speed out and giving Kesler some help down low and on the boards.

Just for ***** and giggles, I like the idea of throwing Clowe out with the Sedins and moving Burrows to the second line-he's had success with Kesler in the past.

Sedin Sedin Clowe

Raymond Kesler Burrows

More realistic is the Canucks targeting a fourth line center or a 'Clowe-lite', whoever that may be.
Quote:
Originally Posted by luiginb View Post
Kesler line, third line?? Slot him in with the Sedins, sit back and enjoy the show. It would take Edler and Torres for him though.
I didn't think through the Sedins/Clowe, as he would compliment the Sedins nicely in hindsight, but when ever we alter the Kesler line from him and two other speedsters, there is very limited success for a few games, and then we're forced back into the "traditional" line combo. Clowe is at least double the guys we've made the changes with, Samuelsson or Torres during his hot streak, but I'm still unconvinced that line would benefit. I agree wholeheartedly with the Sedins though, assuming Burrows doesn't jump back into his 30 goal form.

Cogburn is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:52 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.