HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must use the RUMOR prefix in thread title. Proposals must contain the PROPOSAL prefix in the thread title.

Blackhawks - Maple Leafs

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-05-2011, 09:19 AM
  #1
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,758
vCash: 500
Blackhawks - Maple Leafs


Fredrik Sjostrom


One of:

Jake Skille/Viktor Stalberg/Philippe Paradis/Igor Makarov/Brian Connelly


Last edited by QMJHLfollower: 02-05-2011 at 12:21 PM.
QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:23 AM
  #2
New Liskeard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,449
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLeafs4ever View Post

Fredrik Sjostrom


One or two of:

Jake Skille/Viktor Stalberg/Philippe Paradis/Igor Makarov/Chris DiDomenico/Brian Connelly
Why on earth would the Leafs want Paradis or Dido? Have you seen their numbers this year? Chicago won't trade these players, and the Leafs should not have interest in the other two. If traded, the Leafs will get a mid to late round pick for Shoe.

New Liskeard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:25 AM
  #3
Bubba88
Toews = Savior
 
Bubba88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Bavaria
Country: Germany
Posts: 26,054
vCash: 500
gladly give you Stalberg back, but Sjostrom is not enough add a later pick

Bubba88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:26 AM
  #4
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,758
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TML4LIFE View Post
Why on earth would the Leafs want Paradis or Dido? Have you seen their numbers this year? Chicago won't trade these players, and the Leafs should not have interest in the other two. If traded, the Leafs will get a mid to late round pick for Shoe.
Have you seen Paradis play? He's very good in the QMJHL. Very good defensively, good ofensively, very good shot, very physical, wins one on one battle, etc. He's very complete. In the NHL he could be a good bottom 6 player.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:29 AM
  #5
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,758
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bubba88 View Post
gladly give you Stalberg back, but Sjostrom is not enough add a later pick
I don't think we need to add a pick. Sjostrom straight up for Stalberg is good for both team. Stalberg play on your fourth line, Sjostrom would be a better fit for you there.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:38 AM
  #6
James Duthie
Kadri is 3 Hunna
 
James Duthie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,882
vCash: 500
Take out Igor Makorov, even I know that is not even gonna happen, the Name it's self is too good for that deal.

James Duthie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:39 AM
  #7
New Liskeard
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 9,449
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLeafs4ever View Post
Have you seen Paradis play? He's very good in the QMJHL. Very good defensively, good ofensively, very good shot, very physical, wins one on one battle, etc. He's very complete. In the NHL he could be a good bottom 6 player.
He has not dominated the Q in scoring; he hasn't been a PPG player in the Q. Sure he is big, great shot, physical a and plays both ends of the ice, but is points totals have been mediocre.

New Liskeard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:46 AM
  #8
CB Joe
Registered User
 
CB Joe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,858
vCash: 544
or Chicago could just trade a 4th for Sjostrom and keep their prospects.

CB Joe is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:46 AM
  #9
dubey
Outrage Hobbyist
 
dubey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: the 6ix w/ my woes
Country: Canada
Posts: 21,090
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLeafs4ever View Post
I don't think we need to add a pick. Sjostrom straight up for Stalberg is good for both team. Stalberg play on your fourth line, Sjostrom would be a better fit for you there.
Stalberg would not play on the Leafs fourth line

Brown-Stalberg-Orr/Rosehill?

no
Quote:
Originally Posted by CBJoe View Post
or Chicago could just trade a 4th for Sjostrom and keep their prospects.
That's more likely

dubey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 09:50 AM
  #10
QMJHLfollower
Heart and soul
 
QMJHLfollower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,758
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TML4LIFE View Post
He has not dominated the Q in scoring; he hasn't been a PPG player in the Q. Sure he is big, great shot, physical a and plays both ends of the ice, but is points totals have been mediocre.
You don't need to dominated the QMJHL to be a good player. Have you seen him play? I've seen him play a couple of times, and he was always very good. A game that I've see him is versus the Montreal Junior. He was the best player on the ice with Louis Leblanc and Trevor Parkes.

QMJHLfollower is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 11:35 AM
  #11
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLeafs4ever View Post
You don't need to dominated the QMJHL to be a good player. Have you seen him play? I've seen him play a couple of times, and he was always very good. A game that I've see him is versus the Montreal Junior. He was the best player on the ice with Louis Leblanc and Trevor Parkes.
Exactly. You can't judge a player, especially one who projects to be a good bottom six forward by his stats. His stats are good, basically a PPG, but it's his all around game, size, and physicallity that's inticing about him as a prospect.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 11:37 AM
  #12
HockeySensible
Smug Teuvo
 
HockeySensible's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMLeafs4ever View Post

Fredrik Sjostrom


One or two of:

Jake Skille/Viktor Stalberg/Philippe Paradis/Igor Makarov/Brian Connelly
Viktor Stalberg is the guy I'd move, certainly not 2 of those prospects, but Viktor has more value then Sjostrom. Granted, I'm not saying you're comparing Crosby to Bissonette, but he still has slightly more value.

HockeySensible is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 11:45 AM
  #13
mcphllp
Dion @ 6.5=Discount
 
mcphllp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 7,066
vCash: 500
sjostrom will get a 3rd round pick at best. Even that would be overpayment.

mcphllp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-05-2011, 12:11 PM
  #14
Leaf Predator
Registered User
 
Leaf Predator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Kingston
Country: Canada
Posts: 610
vCash: 500
/thread to everyone who said 3-5 round pick for Sjostrom, not prospects or Stalberg.

Leaf Predator is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.