HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Salary vs. Cap Hit

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
02-15-2011, 07:54 AM
  #1
Dekar
Registered User
 
Dekar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bound Kingdom
Posts: 5,129
vCash: 500
Salary vs. Cap Hit

Why are they sometimes different?

Dekar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2011, 07:59 AM
  #2
jacklours
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Magog
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,222
vCash: 500
If I give you a 2 year contract of 4m the 1st year and 2m for the second. Then the average is 3m which is also your cap hit, yet you never earn exactly 3m any given year.

jacklours is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2011, 08:27 AM
  #3
Dekar
Registered User
 
Dekar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bound Kingdom
Posts: 5,129
vCash: 500
The salary changes from year to year, and the cap hit is the average salary over the length of the contract. Makes sense. Thanks!

EDIT: I'm an idiot, I already knew this but somehow I was reading figures on player contracts and it didn't register in my head at the time. Why else would there have been such a big deal about Kovy's contract and the Devils cap circumvention? I have to restrict posting before 9am.

Dekar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2011, 09:12 AM
  #4
Agalloch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Lachute, QC
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,705
vCash: 500
Seriously, salary and cap hit should be the same...

Agalloch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2011, 10:01 AM
  #5
Dekar
Registered User
 
Dekar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bound Kingdom
Posts: 5,129
vCash: 500
Yeah, I don't see why it isn't. All this circumvention stuff wouldn't be an issue if it was.

If there's needs to be a cap on something, cap the length and value of the contracts. No more of these Yashin and DiPietro debaucles.

Dekar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2011, 10:32 AM
  #6
vofty
Registered User
 
vofty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: TX
Posts: 3,410
vCash: 500
It also allows teams like Dallas who are in temporary severe financial restriction to back load contracts in the hopes that by the time the pay increases for those new contracts come due they will be in a better place financially.

On the other hand front loaded contracts that have a lower salary towards the end are more attractive trade targets for teams that have salary restrictions but aren't anywhere near the cap. Michael Rozsival was an example of this for the Coyotes. Rangers wanted him off the books because of his high caphit and because his salary was lower than his pretty high caphit he was a good option for Phoenix.

vofty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-15-2011, 10:39 AM
  #7
Dekar
Registered User
 
Dekar's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bound Kingdom
Posts: 5,129
vCash: 500
Interesting perspective. Sounds like those situations should be agreed to on a case-by-case basis though. Allowing backloading league-wide seems like it's what put so many teams into cap trouble and shortening rosters on game days. I know all of these cases have to be reviewed and approved by the league, but it doesn't seem like there's much scrutiny on them and that the owners are allowed a little too much freedom in what's supposed to be a structured sports league.

Dekar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2011, 05:24 AM
  #8
boredmale
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 23,251
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Agalloch View Post
Seriously, salary and cap hit should be the same...
I wonder if the league will push that so we don't get front loaded deals anymore

boredmale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2011, 06:56 AM
  #9
RangerBoy
#freejtmiller
 
RangerBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 31,851
vCash: 500
The Rangers front-loaded Rozsival's contract because it made him easier to trade at the back end of the deal or assign to the AHL. Rozsival wanted $5M per. They were concerned about Rozsival's health at the end of the contract. He was coming off hip surgery when the Rangers gave Rozsival 4 years/$20M. Rozsival has had two knee surgeries. ACL and a minor one. If benefitted him to get 65% of the contract in the first two years.

$7M
$6M
$4M
$3M

RangerBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
02-16-2011, 08:45 AM
  #10
tarheelhockey
Global Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 32,475
vCash: 500
The problem with making cap hit equal to salary is that it allows teams to play even more games to squeeze players under the cap. The current system was supposed to prevent circumvention, but ended up getting abused due to the frontloading loophole.

Unfortunately the GMs just aren't grown-up enough to operate on an honor system.

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:09 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.