HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > New York Rangers
Notices

Are we stuck with Gaborik? (If it doesn't work out)

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
03-07-2011, 09:26 PM
  #51
SupersonicMonkey*
DROP THE PUCK
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: USA
Country: United States
Posts: 13,779
vCash: 500
When Gaborik is healthy, confident, and going, he's a top 5-10 point getter in the NHL and a top 5 goal scorer in the NHL.

For me, its never an issue of his talent. He has all the talent and skill in the world. And he's a good guy, and he cares.

But the compete level for whatever reason, is not always there, and he's an injury risk, for what ever reason.

All I want is for him to remain healthy, and compete hard every game.

When he does that, the entire makeup of the team is different.

I've been hard on him this season, but if part of his trouble was a concussion and his shoulder, Ill admit I was wrong. But we need him to be Gaborik. And not Kovalev.

SupersonicMonkey* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 10:21 PM
  #52
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,082
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Steven Mastrosimone View Post
9m? It's 7.5.

If Sather wanted to trade him, he easily could. The guy is still a superstar sniper, one off year does not change this.
what he said.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 10:46 PM
  #53
Vitto79
Registered User
 
Vitto79's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sarnia
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,179
vCash: 500
did Gaborik not score 42 goals last yr. This thread is stupid

Vitto79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 11:00 PM
  #54
NugentHopkinsfan
Also Wil Fan
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 6,449
vCash: 500
Second highest goals per game average in the NHL since the lockout!

As of about a month ago, maybe it's changed but still when he's healthy he IS a superstar.

NugentHopkinsfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 11:21 PM
  #55
PromNite
Simon Belmont
 
PromNite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 5,882
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to PromNite
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
What I wouldn't give to have Kovalchuk instead of Gaborik.
I would LOVE to have seen you post that earlier this season, when everyone under the sun had more goals than Kovy.

__________________


Adam Tensta's from the 163
PromNite is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-07-2011, 11:49 PM
  #56
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,082
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PromNite View Post
I would LOVE to have seen you post that earlier this season, when everyone under the sun had more goals than Kovy.
i never posted id rather have Kovy than Gabby, but ive said repeatedly, even when he was ice cold, that it was a huge mistake not signing him.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 01:08 AM
  #57
Pizza
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 8,604
vCash: 500
I think he snaps out of it. If we can get a playoff berth it will be his chance to redeem a sub par season. That is what I'm hoping for. The other thing I'll worry about when I have to.

Pizza is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 02:01 AM
  #58
chosen
Registered User
 
chosen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 4,313
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by PromNite View Post
I would LOVE to have seen you post that earlier this season, when everyone under the sun had more goals than Kovy.
I would gladly have said it then if it was ever a topic for discussion. I was against signing Gaborik since it was first rumored.

Kovalchuk produces every year. Gaborik doesn't. Kovalchuk plays a full season. Gaborik doesn't. One will end up in the Hall of Fame. Guess which one.

This nonsense of points per game is wonderful. Too bad standings are not dependent on those types of stats.

chosen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 02:58 AM
  #59
Hollywood163
Registered User
 
Hollywood163's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Monmouth County, NJ
Posts: 1,170
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
I would gladly have said it then if it was ever a topic for discussion. I was against signing Gaborik since it was first rumored.

Kovalchuk produces every year. Gaborik doesn't. Kovalchuk plays a full season. Gaborik doesn't. One will end up in the Hall of Fame. Guess which one.

This nonsense of points per game is wonderful. Too bad standings are not dependent on those types of stats.

Kovalchucks production in the second half also debunks the main theory everyone bought into when the Rangers gave Gaborik that superstar contract.

The theory was that Gabby would be a 50+ goal scorer once he was freed from the shackles of Jaques Lemaire's system in Minnesota.

Kovy has flourished under Lemaire.

Hollywood163 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 06:56 AM
  #60
bumrusherer
Registered User
 
bumrusherer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 2,817
vCash: 500
We are not stuck with him...yes he has injury history but he also has goalscoring history and that history is more important than one off season.

Now if next season is directly related to this one...then we may have an issue for our team but even then, if he has a bad year next year, He only has 2 years on the deal after that...which is managable.

bumrusherer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 07:56 AM
  #61
SingnBluesOnBroadway
Retired
 
SingnBluesOnBroadway's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: NYC
Country: United States
Posts: 27,361
vCash: 500
Awards:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywood163 View Post
The theory was that Gabby would be a 50+ goal scorer once he was freed from the shackles of Jaques Lemaire's system in Minnesota.
I don't recall that theory being floated at all.

__________________
SingnBluesOnBroadway is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 08:29 AM
  #62
pld459666
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,137
vCash: 500
Don't think that I would lable our situation with Gaborik as being "stuck"

I'm sure that he can be traded, I have no doubt in my mind that he can be traded. Are we going to get fair value for him today? Probably not, but in the summer from a team that needs a scoring winger that may have missed out on a key UFA signing? I can see it.

That said, I agree with some of the previous posters that assign some of his struggles to the shoulder injury not being 100% and if we were in a different situation (comfortably in a PO spot, or totally out of the PO's) I would probably shut him down for a little longer.

Gaborik will heal and will come back strong again next season.

I think I'd be more concerned with him if the issues that he was dealing with were groin/hip/back than shoulder.

Gabby will be fine.

pld459666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 08:32 AM
  #63
SML
Registered User
 
SML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 3,666
vCash: 500
Pre concussion Lindros was unstoppable in every facet of the game. He was more than elite, he was unique. Nobody else brought it all like that. He was a bigger, stronger, Mark Messier in his prime. Anyway, injuries happen. I don't think you can label Gaborik yet. He's a great winger, but we have no center to set him up. We got him for free. There's no doubt we could move him. Fair value for a guy you got for nothing is all profit, no matter what it is. Did we get fair value for Gomez? That deal looks like genius now. Some team will always take a chance and believe they have the players, coach, or system to turn the guy around. Unless he's completely shot, like Redden or Drury.

SML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 08:37 AM
  #64
pld459666
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Danbury, CT
Country: United States
Posts: 13,137
vCash: 500
.

Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
Close. Lindros wasn't half the player that Crosby is.
I'd take a healthy Lindros over a healthy Crosby 10 out of 10 times.

But that could be because I didn't think that Eric was as big a crybaby that Sidney is, and I like the physical style that Eric employed in addition to being supremely talented.

Total package vs. total package, I take Lindros, easily.

pld459666 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 08:46 AM
  #65
chip chipperson*
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 1,948
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
I would gladly have said it then if it was ever a topic for discussion. I was against signing Gaborik since it was first rumored.

Kovalchuk produces every year. Gaborik doesn't. Kovalchuk plays a full season. Gaborik doesn't. One will end up in the Hall of Fame. Guess which one.

This nonsense of points per game is wonderful. Too bad standings are not dependent on those types of stats.
what a convenient response

chip chipperson* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 08:46 AM
  #66
Stepanformayor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 318
vCash: 500
Supermonkey, do you watch the games? We had 7 goals on Sunday, and he was not invoved in one goal. For you to say that he is a top 5 player in the NHL is flat out a dumb statement. I can think of 25 better players right now. He is on the down slide, and will not return to elite status. Tis guy is a bum!!

Stepanformayor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:09 AM
  #67
KreiMeARiver
Recently Lobotomized
 
KreiMeARiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the 38th parallel
Posts: 5,133
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by devito1192 View Post
that speaks more about how good ovechkin is
Correct. Ovechkin, Crosby, Stamkos are elite... Gaborik isn't.


so... that tells me...Gaborik isn't elite. But I didn't need that to tell me that.

Quote:
Originally Posted by New England Hockey View Post
Semantics. You, or anyone else would not have said that before his injury.
Are you kidding me? Yes, I would have. I NEVER...repeat NEVER was all that high on him. NEVER. So, don't put words in my mouth.

He certainly doesn't have the talent of Big E. or Foppa.

KreiMeARiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:14 AM
  #68
KreiMeARiver
Recently Lobotomized
 
KreiMeARiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the 38th parallel
Posts: 5,133
vCash: 500
Oh and your "ppg" Gaborik has 23 games this year without a point, on top of the games he missed. Yeah he's elite, alright.

KreiMeARiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:16 AM
  #69
KreiMeARiver
Recently Lobotomized
 
KreiMeARiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the 38th parallel
Posts: 5,133
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SingnBluesOnBroadway View Post
I don't recall that theory being floated at all.
I heard it, also...like a million times.

The thing is, he has the talent to score 50 goals, as he almost did last year. The problem is his body, and his brain are his own personal "shackles".

KreiMeARiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:18 AM
  #70
Fitzy
Moderator
Long Live Tarnstrom
 
Fitzy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 16,796
vCash: 2316
Since the lockout, Gaborik has 182 goals in 332 games. That is more than .5GPG averaging out to 45 goals over an 82 game season. On a yearly basis, there are only 2-3 players who reach that total each season.

So, when healthy, Gaborik plays at an elite level, at least from a pure goal scoring perspective. There are a lot of disclaimers, but in terms of pure production he is elite.

Fitzy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:19 AM
  #71
94now
Registered User
 
94now's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Snow Belt, USA
Country: United Nations
Posts: 6,233
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hightide85 View Post
Elite "talent" and elite "player" are two different things.

If a guy is a PPG guy, but only comes to work half the time, is he really an elite player? NO

"Elite", to me, means staying healthy and producing a PPG on a consistent basis. Normal injuries are a part of sports..but when there is a pattern, year in and year out, of missing major time, then, well...you lose the "elite" status. Plus, his head doesn't seem to be in the game, a lot of times.

Crosby is elite... Stamkos, St. Louis, The Sedins, Datsyuk, etc. Gaborik is a notch below.
As of now Crosby is nothing. Does it make him less elite?

Lindros was not elite? Some people either have insomnia or were in diapers in 1997 when he destroyed us in playoffs all by himself. We were a better team than in 1994.

Name one player who got back after shoulder injury and was able to score goals as usual. Just one, elite preferably.

You sound like we had other options and went wrong with Gaby. Unlike Gomez, Drury and Redden we didn't make any mistake signing him, simply because he was by far the best and arguably the only option available.

Shoulder injury has nothing to do with any history, it is not chronic matter like muscle injuries such as groin. Concussion is a detriment as may reoccur, but it has never happened before. Shoulder, if healed properly should not be an issue, just needs time to regain strength , a year or so. You are mixing apples and oranges with ease out of legitimate frustration here.

94now is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:23 AM
  #72
KreiMeARiver
Recently Lobotomized
 
KreiMeARiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: the 38th parallel
Posts: 5,133
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by 94now View Post
As of now Crosby is nothing. Does it make him less elite?

Lindros was not elite? Some people either have insomnia or were in diapers in 1997 when he destroyed us in playoffs all by himself. We were a better team than in 1994.
Name one player who got back after shoulder injury and was able to score goals as usual. Just one, elite preferably.

You sound like we had other options and went wrong with Gaby. Unlike Gomez, Drury and Redden we didn't make any mistake signing him, simply because he was by far the best and arguably the only option available.

Shoulder injury has nothing to do with any history, it is not chronic matter like muscle injuries such as groin. Concussion is a detriment as may reoccur, but it has never happened before. Shoulder, if healed properly should not be an issue, just needs time, a year or so. You are mixing apples and oranges with ease out of legitimate frustration here.
I didn't say Lindros wasn't elite; quite the opposite, actually.

Gaborik is a headcase who is injury prone. He doesn't give 100% effort every night, even when healthy.

And yes, we did have other options: It's called NOT TAKE A GIGANTIC RISK on a player who has a pattern of injuries. This is how we got into the whole financial crisis- greed and an insatiable appetite for risk. We could have not signed him, it's as simple as that. We don't have to sign the big name free agent every year, regardless of who it is, the risk involved, and how much we'll have to pay over his actual value.

Don't try to patronize me, either..thanks.

KreiMeARiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:32 AM
  #73
Midnight85
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Country: United States
Posts: 430
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Midnight85 Send a message via MSN to Midnight85
Since when is Gaborik a headcase? If anything he's always seemed like one of the more level headed players I've seen.

He got banged up, and a really don't think you can take a concussion and say its the same old injured Gaborik.

A concussion happens to anyone and has nothing to do with his priors. He still can and will score goals for the Rangers. He has more talent then anyone the Rangers have, or had a chance of getting in the near future. His contract is actually pretty affordable for that kind of talent and the term is pretty nice compared to some of the contracts coming out.

Midnight85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:35 AM
  #74
allstar3970
Registered User
 
allstar3970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,226
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by chosen View Post
I would gladly have said it then if it was ever a topic for discussion. I was against signing Gaborik since it was first rumored.

Kovalchuk produces every year. Gaborik doesn't. Kovalchuk plays a full season. Gaborik doesn't. One will end up in the Hall of Fame. Guess which one.

This nonsense of points per game is wonderful. Too bad standings are not dependent on those types of stats.
Ok so if we signed Kovalchuk for 15 years, and he put up only 30 goals (around where he'll get) you would be happy? You'd probably be ragging on him right now.

What if he started hot and cooled down (basically just reversing his production this year) what would you say then? You'd be bashing him like crazy.

Let me guess you're gonna say something ridiculous like "at least now he's scoring down the stretch when it counts." Guess what? The 2 points in the 1st game of the season count as much as the 2 points in the last game. Getting those points early eliminates the need for them late. I don't know why this is so hard for people to understand.


Last edited by allstar3970: 03-08-2011 at 09:58 AM.
allstar3970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
03-08-2011, 09:50 AM
  #75
Stugots
Registered User
 
Stugots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Long Island
Posts: 5,964
vCash: 500
I love all the Gaborik bashers. They were non-existant last season when he put up 42g and 44a. Now that he's having an injury-filled down year they all pop out of the woodwork and are like "SEE! I TOLD YOU SO!"

Stugots is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:01 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.