HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > New York Rangers
Notices

New Offensive Line Pairings

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-05-2011, 05:45 PM
  #1
RidinwitdaKING
Registered User
 
RidinwitdaKING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 272
vCash: 500
New Offensive Line Pairings

Gaborik-Dubinsky-Avery
Wolski-Anisimov-Prospal
Christensen-Stephan-Gilroy/Drury
Prust-Boyle-Fedotenko

RidinwitdaKING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2011, 05:59 PM
  #2
diehard
Registered User
 
diehard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 31
vCash: 500
why would the wolski-stepan-prospal line be broken up?

diehard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2011, 06:07 PM
  #3
That Stepan Guy
Jefferek Stepaninner
 
That Stepan Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 500
I think if anything the Wolski-Stepan-Prospal line has to stay together. I personally see the new lines as just:

Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik
Wolski-Stepan-Prospal
Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust
Avery-Christensen-Gilroy

That Stepan Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2011, 06:11 PM
  #4
Inferno
HFB Partner
 
Inferno's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Atlanta, GA
Country: United States
Posts: 19,850
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DStep21NYR View Post
I think if anything the Wolski-Stepan-Prospal line has to stay together. I personally see the new lines as just:

Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik
Wolski-Stepan-Prospal
Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust
Avery-Christensen-Gilroy
thats how i see em as well.

Inferno is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2011, 06:14 PM
  #5
Grumpy Humphrey
Registered User
 
Grumpy Humphrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Country: United States
Posts: 2,423
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by DStep21NYR View Post
I think if anything the Wolski-Stepan-Prospal line has to stay together. I personally see the new lines as just:

Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik
Wolski-Stepan-Prospal
Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust
Avery-Christensen-Gilroy
While it may not look like much on paper, if you've watched them play all year, outside of that fourth line, that's not nearly as horrible as one might expect

Grumpy Humphrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2011, 06:18 PM
  #6
That Stepan Guy
Jefferek Stepaninner
 
That Stepan Guy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: New York
Country: United States
Posts: 1,553
vCash: 500
The first line of Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik can spark some offense. Gaborik wants to make up for the Callanhan loss so he might be able to fill in Callahan's offensive role on that line. Gaborik and Dubinsky have previous chemistry which is good.

The second line of Wolski-Stepan-Prospal just looked very good last night. Hopefully that line keeps rolling because all three players are offensive threats and all three seemingly have chemistry.

The third line of Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust has been good all year.

The fourth line is essentially for leftovers.

That Stepan Guy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-05-2011, 06:26 PM
  #7
VJ Rangerfan
Registered User
 
VJ Rangerfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: NY
Country: United States
Posts: 804
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to VJ Rangerfan
Quote:
Originally Posted by Billionaire Bot View Post
While it may not look like much on paper, if you've watched them play all year, outside of that fourth line, that's not nearly as horrible as one might expect
I agree. With Cally out, I think that lineup may give us the best chance to win. Plus if Drury is ready, I wouldn't mind seeing him bumped into Gilroy's spot but I DO want to see Gilroy get a chance at wing, where IMO he will succeed.

VJ Rangerfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2011, 01:53 AM
  #8
RidinwitdaKING
Registered User
 
RidinwitdaKING's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Country: United States
Posts: 272
vCash: 500
Just looking for some balance and spark from these combos. Really would like to see
Wolski-Anisimov-Prospal

RidinwitdaKING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2011, 01:54 AM
  #9
n1cON
bleeds blue ! ! !
 
n1cON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: here & there
Country: Germany
Posts: 812
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DStep21NYR View Post
I think if anything the Wolski-Stepan-Prospal line has to stay together. I personally see the new lines as just:

Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik
Wolski-Stepan-Prospal
Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust
Avery-Christensen-Gilroy
The best solution in my eyes. I think Torts will go with this.

n1cON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2011, 02:00 AM
  #10
Wraparounds
Powerful Wizard
 
Wraparounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 8,381
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DStep21NYR View Post
I think if anything the Wolski-Stepan-Prospal line has to stay together. I personally see the new lines as just:

Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik
Wolski-Stepan-Prospal
Fedotenko-Boyle-Prust
Avery-Christensen-Gilroy
Exactly, except I like Wolski at RW.

Wraparounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2011, 03:32 AM
  #11
eco's bones
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Elmira NY
Country: United States
Posts: 12,357
vCash: 500
As of now Drury's availability is a ?-mark--Gilroy is an experiment. I always thought that Drury should have been on left wing (not right wing) because he was always best at sneaking into seams to finish off close in chances--he's never really been much of a playmaker. Really though how ready is he to go? after looking pretty bad already this season and why put him in an unfamiliar right wing position?--which is another way of saying he is not a good fit replacing Callahan--and for that matter Avery is not a right wing either. Not sure if Fedotenko could move to RW but you'd be busting up Boyle's line if you did that. So if the Gilroy experiment fails the situation IMO argues more for Zuccarello who can play either wing and you're not breaking any lines up.

A good reason to give Gilroy a shot--he's an extra defenseman if one of our defenders go down. That might come in handy.

Of the other AHL candidates besides Zuccarello--Newbury is a solid, gritty guy--good at faceoffs. Weise is a real right wing--pretty much straight up and down his wing--he did get a handful of chances with us but didn't bury anything. He has size, strength and grit.

There really isn't any good replacement for Callahan. The team is going to lose some forechecking, physical play and a really good penalty killer and one of our better scoring threats. With the possible exception of Prust--Callahan is our grittiest forward--Dubinsky may be close but he's not as consistent. Quite literally he's irreplaceable.

eco's bones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2011, 03:51 AM
  #12
mrhockey193195
Registered User
 
mrhockey193195's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 3,316
vCash: 500
I really like the idea of Dubinsky-Anisimov-Gaborik. I feel like that line might have some solid chemistry, just a hunch.

mrhockey193195 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
04-06-2011, 05:35 AM
  #13
mullichicken25
Registered User
 
mullichicken25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,548
vCash: 500
If you look back over the season you'll notice a trend, Dubinsky + anyone = good.

That being said, im optimistic about Dubi and Gabby playing together

mullichicken25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:26 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.