HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Atlantic Division > Tampa Bay Lightning
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Yzerman Will Ask All Lightning Players To Wear Visors Next Year

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
04-07-2011, 02:44 PM
  #26
Hockeyfan02
Registered User
 
Hockeyfan02's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Pistivity
Country: United States
Posts: 13,868
vCash: 500
It doesn't sound like Yzerman is forcing any of the players to wear one, just asking them to reconsider it if they don't wear one. He suffered a nasty eye injury near the end of his career and then wore a visor. I don't care either way if the players want to wear them or not, it's their choice...they do know the risks. I just hope the reason isnt an outdated stereotype that players that wear visors are soft.

Hockeyfan02 is offline  
Old
04-07-2011, 03:18 PM
  #27
TBLbrian
Registered User
 
TBLbrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: NC
Country: United States
Posts: 3,733
vCash: 500
I think they should be grandfathered in..can you imagine how different this thread would look if the injury was serious to Vinny's eye?

TBLbrian is offline  
Old
04-07-2011, 03:32 PM
  #28
IdealisticSniper
Registered User
 
IdealisticSniper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 8,776
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by TBLbrifri View Post
I think they should be grandfathered in..can you imagine how different this thread would look if the injury was serious to Vinny's eye?
Yep. I have a feeling this is the exact same type of discussion that was going on when helmets were going to be made mandatory.

IdealisticSniper is offline  
Old
04-08-2011, 11:07 AM
  #29
CaptBrannigan
Registered User
 
CaptBrannigan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Tampa
Country: United States
Posts: 2,779
vCash: 500
To clear something up, a visor only gives you an extra two minute penalty if the player also receives an instigator and the other player doesn't have one.

Visor player instigates with another visor player = no additional penalty
Visor player instigates a player with no visor = extra 2 minutes

This is how the rule should (not an opinion, going by rulebook) although it's not always adhered to it seems.

CaptBrannigan is offline  
Old
04-10-2011, 07:29 AM
  #30
LightningStrikes
Moderator
 
LightningStrikes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Country: Germany
Posts: 11,453
vCash: 50
Quote:
It is interesting that Lightning W Ryan Malone, above, so opposes wearing a visor, a subject that came up last week when teammate Vinny Lecavalier was hit in the eye with a stick blade.

Malone said his grandfather on his father's side, "Wild" Bill Malone, lost an eye playing hockey as a minor-leaguer in New Brunswick. Malone's father, Greg, Tampa Bay's head pro scout, never wore a visor, either, when he played in the NHL from 1976 to 1987, mostly with the Penguins.

Wild Bill had a glass eye from the puck accident. "We always used to play cards," Malone said, "and we always knew which one was his glass eye."
http://www.tampabay.com/sports/hocke...-bolts/1162845

LightningStrikes is offline  
Old
04-13-2011, 10:24 AM
  #31
Off Center
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 216
vCash: 500
a similar debate follows virtually every change towards safety in pro sports, and even in industry or society. it's seen as inconvenient, untraditional, and it's frequently pointed out that people have managed to get by without the measure since the dawn of whatever activity. the wussification of some pasttime is moaned over, but eventually everyone adjusts and forgets what the fuss was about. nobody thinks playing with a goalie mask is a bastardization of hockey anymore

moreover these guys are multi-million dollar investments and pro athlete contracts regularly prohibit high risk activity like skydiving, riding motorcycles, or even playing basketball. the idea is that although there is less than 1% chance of those things harming your ability to play hockey, the risk of these activities is sill too great and the means to eliminate it is simple. why not follow suit with basic workplace hazards?

fair play to the vets if they want to keep doing what they've done for years, but i think grandfathering it in makes sense and won't be very disruptive

Off Center is offline  
Old
04-19-2011, 01:28 PM
  #32
Absolute
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 20
vCash: 500
Yzerman, you live in Florida. Drive to a dive (scuba)shop, buy some magic anti-fog spray/solution for the visors, and end the argument.

Absolute is offline  
Old
04-19-2011, 04:40 PM
  #33
Felonious Python
Moderator
Purple Squirrel
 
Felonious Python's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: The Hot Seat
Posts: 13,186
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Absolute View Post
Yzerman, you live in Florida. Drive to a dive (scuba)shop, buy some magic anti-fog spray/solution for the visors, and end the argument.
They have anti-fog spray that is legitimately magical?

Better idea, have the players stop breathing. Marty could do it.

Felonious Python is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:06 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2014 All Rights Reserved.