so does "upper body injury" for seabs in this case mean concussion? i hate all this coded were not going to say whats wrong with our player upper/lower body b.s. in the nhl, and it seems like Q is the king of this, never gives a straight answer about an injury, Pacioretty would probably have an upper body injury and be evaluated before each game if he played for the hawks, i know there is some kind of strategy not letting your opponents know whats hurting on players but bolland was listed as an upper body injury for a while even though everyone knew it was a concussion Q wouldnt acknowledge thats what it was...
I wouldn't be surprised if he has a neck injury with that whiplash effect. He said in his interview, he was "feeling it now", and wasn't referring to his head. It must be pretty bad too, for him to declare himself out before noon today.
Being swept in the 1st round would probably temper the enthusiasm of the city regarding hockey. I anticipate next year plenty of tickets being available for cheap prices.
This kind of reminds me of the White Sox. Win the world series in 2005 followed by mediocrity. I think we are following the same path with the Hawks.
Being swept in the 1st round would probably temper the enthusiasm of the city regarding hockey. I anticipate next year plenty of tickets being available for cheap prices.
This kind of reminds me of the White Sox. Win the world series in 2005 followed by mediocrity. I think we are following the same path with the Hawks.
Sox won 90 games in 06, not exactly mediocrity....
The problem with the sox is that its baseball, the area isn't as nice as wrigleyville, and the cell doesn't have nostalgia on it's side.
Being swept in the 1st round would probably temper the enthusiasm of the city regarding hockey. I anticipate next year plenty of tickets being available for cheap prices.
This kind of reminds me of the White Sox. Win the world series in 2005 followed by mediocrity. I think we are following the same path with the Hawks.
^
Yeah sure
Dont know if you know it but the Bulls likely wont be playing next year (NBA Lockout is gonna be ugly ,, NBA owners going hard after union)
+
Possible NFL Work Stoppage
And once Wirtz died the fans returned ,, So on ice success isn't the #1 factor in the fans return
Dont know if you know it but the Bulls likely wont be playing next year (NBA Lockout is gonna be ugly ,, NBA owners going hard after union)
+
Possible NFL Work Stoppage
And once Wirtz died the fans returned ,, So on ice success isn't the #1 factor in the fans return
Let me try this again...lol.
But their on ice performance may be the factor in the fans disappearance within the next couple of years. Unless of course the Hawks come back strong next season.
But their on ice performance may be the factor in the fans disappearance within the next couple of years. Unless of course the Hawks come back strong next season.
Hawks drew fans with mediorce teams in 70's and 80's
Hawks wont be hitting rock bottom anytime soon so there wont be any issues IMO
