HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Vancouver Canucks
Notices

Canucks sign F Marco Sturm to 1 year, $2.25M deal

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
07-01-2011, 06:20 PM
  #276
Kagee*
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Country: Canada
Posts: 7,096
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Gumble View Post
Who really was "cheap" that was signed today though that fits that description?
off the top of my head, that were affordable and cheaper than Sturm,

Brunette, Poni, Sullivan, D'Agostini, Kennedy.

Kagee* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:21 PM
  #277
y2kcanucks
Cult of Personality
 
y2kcanucks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Surrey, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 37,225
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to y2kcanucks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagee View Post
off the top of my head, that were affordable and cheaper than Sturm,

Brunette, Poni, Sullivan, D'Agostini, Kennedy.
I would have loved Kennedy at Sturm money. Would have been a much, much better signing.

__________________
I told ya so. I was right all along!
y2kcanucks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:23 PM
  #278
dblminor4boarding
Registered User
 
dblminor4boarding's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmonton
Country: Canada
Posts: 308
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by jigsaw99 View Post
Garbage player... we way too much for a 4th liner who is soft.
it would be nice to get 20 goals from a 4th liner

dblminor4boarding is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:23 PM
  #279
hackey
QualityOverQuantity
 
hackey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SoStopPostingSoMuch
Posts: 2,627
vCash: 500
It's pretty obvious that Raymond may be more hurt than originally thought, and may be place on long term LITR until
possibly 2012, so Sturm is his replacement, as the money is the same.

So there's still room for a Top 6 Power Forward, most likely via trade

hackey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:25 PM
  #280
Barney Gumble
Registered User
 
Barney Gumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,202
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kagee View Post
off the top of my head, that were affordable and cheaper than Sturm,

Brunette, Poni, Sullivan, D'Agostini, Kennedy.
D'Agostini & Kennedy re-signed with their teams. Only way you'd get them would be to obviously pay MORE than what they signed for their team.

Poni? Meh, slow and lazy. Vigneault may not like Sturm but he'd HATE Poni

Brunette? Maybe, but he's pretty slow and doesn't fit with the makeup of the team.

Barney Gumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:25 PM
  #281
Aquiace
The Goggles!
 
Aquiace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Back in VanCity
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,768
vCash: 500
This is a real head scratcher. There's no way Sturm was getting offers even close to this, if there were any at all.

He is not a coveted free agent. There are so many better players he could have got for less. Even if Gillis really wanted him for some bizarre reason, I'm fairly positive he'd sign for half of that contract. FFS, Higgins is a better player and he was re-signed for 300k less!

Aquiace is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:26 PM
  #282
NYVanfan
Registered User
 
NYVanfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Posts: 5,311
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dado View Post
Well I dunno - it's a "whatever" signing in my books - but when all is said and done I don't see our closest competitors finding gems out there either - so on the whole the day is a wash IMO.
Hawks got a whole lot better today
Brunette, ODonnell, Carcillo, Mayers ...all short term. Montador was longer term, but that's ok, I think.

Wish we had done Brunette & Carcillo deals

NYVanfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:26 PM
  #283
Barney Gumble
Registered User
 
Barney Gumble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 16,202
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquiace View Post
Higgins is a better player and he was re-signed for 300k less!
Higgins got a two year deal and it was a re-signing (that you figure has to come at least some marginal discount).

Barney Gumble is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:26 PM
  #284
CASUAL KEV
Jack Adams™
 
CASUAL KEV's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Sk, Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 8,482
vCash: 500
why

why?

CASUAL KEV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:27 PM
  #285
Henrik
...
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,336
vCash: 50
Gillis: "We checked him out thoroughly. He's getting an opportunity to play with good players"

"We think he's fully covered now [from knee injuries] and can score 20-25 goals if he plays well."

Yep here's your new line mate Kesler.

Henrik is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:28 PM
  #286
Cocoa Crisp
Registered User
 
Cocoa Crisp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NYC
Country: Hong Kong
Posts: 2,670
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ballhofflerhuis View Post
Gillis: "We checked him out thoroughly. He's getting an opportunity to play with good players"

"We think he's fully covered now [from knee injuries] and can score 20-25 goals if he plays well."

Yep here's your new line mate Kesler.
He's Raymond insurance. It seems likely Raymond may be gone for a good long while.

Cocoa Crisp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:28 PM
  #287
Grapes1290
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Posts: 22
vCash: 500
WTF Gillis? Do something right, and get Kesler someone to play with!

Grapes1290 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:31 PM
  #288
I in the Eye
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Country: Croatia
Posts: 3,629
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by biturbo19 View Post
the thing i still don't get though, is that $2.25M isn't exactly chump change, even on a 1 year deal. and that seems fairly at odds with what i make of the 'Gillis Approach' of not wasting $$$ on 'compromise/okayish' players...and instead, going after 'great players' and filling out with very very cheap 'moneypuck' low-risk/high-reward longshot players.
$2.25 isn't chump change, but it is $.25 less than what it would cost to have Raymond on the roster, if he wasn't hurt and put into LTIR purgatory... If no injury issues, I'd imagine that Sturm would get around $4.25 today (given what other UFAs are signing for) instead of $2.25... Probably, at least, $1 million more...

IMO, the Canucks still get a Kesler winger, and physical 4th line Glass upgrade... I don't think the Sturm signing stops this from happening...

$2.25 is an amount that, I think, the Canucks should be able to just about squeeze to make it work when Raymond comes back (assuming the Canucks also get a Kesler winger for between $4 - $5... and 4th liner for around $1). On paper (assuming the Canucks spend right up to the cap - to get the most out of the LTIR benefit) when Raymond comes back, the Canucks are $2.5 over... But with injuries that are bound to occur (and uncertainty with how long Raymond will take to recover), the Canucks should be able to come under without making roster turnover (getting rid of a player's rights)... Next season, it's juggling the cap to make room for a gluttony of forwards, as the Canucks juggled the cap for the gluttony of defensemen last season... Hope that come the last day of the regular season, all the forwards play their first game together... With this approach, the Canucks ice a playoff team greater than the salary cap otherwise suggests they can...

IMO, Sturm fits... It's an around Raymond cap hit, and Sturm brings depth to the line-up... He also has question marks and can contribute to the "need injuries to be cap compliant" game, to be a pawn for Gillman to make the cap work... Sturm could be a solid complimentary player on the team (greater value than $2.25 otherwise suggests), yet he can also be somebody who is first to be shipped out if it doesn't work - in the event that a roster decision needs to be made (a la Schaefer last season)...

I like the signing... Assuming it doesn't affect the Canucks getting a significant Kesler winger... and I don't think it does...


Last edited by I in the Eye: 07-01-2011 at 06:45 PM.
I in the Eye is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:35 PM
  #289
particularsolution
Registered User
 
particularsolution's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 349
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Aquiace View Post
This is a real head scratcher. There's no way Sturm was getting offers even close to this, if there were any at all.

He is not a coveted free agent. There are so many better players he could have got for less. Even if Gillis really wanted him for some bizarre reason, I'm fairly positive he'd sign for half of that contract. FFS, Higgins is a better player and he was re-signed for 300k less!
This.

2.25 seems way too high for a reclamation project like Sturm. If you had told me Canucks were signing Sturm I would have guessed 1-1.5 mill, similar to Torres last year. Gillis seems to think he's capable of scoring 20-25 goals. That is not happening without top 6 minutes and at the very least 2nd unit PP time. Not exactly the kind of player I would like to be giving those minutes.

particularsolution is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:35 PM
  #290
kanuck87
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,940
vCash: 500
For all those that are saying that Sturm can replace Raymond's cap hit if Raymond is put on LTIR so it means we still have the cap space to get a legit top-6 forward, you're wrong. We can't use Raymond's LTIR space until we use up every single dollar of cap space that we have, so there is about no way we can go out and get a top-6 forward anymore.

kanuck87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:36 PM
  #291
Andy Dufresne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Country: Kazakhstan
Posts: 1,196
vCash: 434
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Gumble View Post
Who really was "cheap" that was signed today though that fits that description?
Tim Brent: 2 yrs for 1.5M : 750k cap hit for a youngish UFA who does a lot of the same things we payed Ryan Johnson 1.1M cap hit for 3 years ago in a completely different market/salary cap. He's my "great buy of the day" player.

Andy Dufresne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:38 PM
  #292
Tiranis
Moderator
 
Tiranis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 16,536
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYVanfan View Post
Hawks got a whole lot better today
Brunette, ODonnell, Carcillo, Mayers ...all short term. Montador was longer term, but that's ok, I think.

Wish we had done Brunette & Carcillo deals
You're not serious, are you? They got better by acquiring Mayers and O'Donnell? do you WATCH hockey?

Tiranis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:39 PM
  #293
Burr14
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 706
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by LickTheEnvelope View Post
lol Gillis: "seeing these guys who have never scored 20 goals in a season scoring making double Alex Burrows on 4, 5, 6 year deals..."
Burrows is probably the most underpaid player in the league. His contract is not representative of the market value for a player of his caliber.

Burr14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:40 PM
  #294
opendoor
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 6,418
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanuck87 View Post
For all those that are saying that Sturm can replace Raymond's cap hit if Raymond is put on LTIR so it means we still have the cap space to get a legit top-6 forward, you're wrong. We can't use Raymond's LTIR space until we use up every single dollar of cap space that we have, so there is about no way we can go out and get a top-6 forward anymore.
No, they're right. As long as Raymond's on LTIR the Canucks can replace his salary.

opendoor is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:40 PM
  #295
Tiranis
Moderator
 
Tiranis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Toronto, ON
Country: Czech_ Republic
Posts: 16,536
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by kanuck87 View Post
For all those that are saying that Sturm can replace Raymond's cap hit if Raymond is put on LTIR so it means we still have the cap space to get a legit top-6 forward, you're wrong. We can't use Raymond's LTIR space until we use up every single dollar of cap space that we have, so there is about no way we can go out and get a top-6 forward anymore.
I don't think you realize how dumb you sound.

Tiranis is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:43 PM
  #296
biturbo19
Registered User
 
biturbo19's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,143
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Barney Gumble View Post
Who really was "cheap" that was signed today though that fits that description?
that's not the idea at all. the idea is that the 'cheap' signings that fill that description will probably be found LATER in the offseason, after the initial crazydust has settled.

my take on Gillis Philosophy is:
-sign 'GREAT' players immediately amidst the frenzy because they're worth it (eg. Hamhuis).
-don't sign big $$$ and big term contracts with 'less than ideal' players just because they're all that is currently available.
-sign cheap longshots with upside later when they no longer hold all the cards and can't demand stupid salaries (eg. Torres) and of course guys like Tambi, Wellwood, etc who maybe haven't panned out 'great', but have certainly contributed in their time here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Connecticut View Post
I think frustration is making you miss the point. Sturm is on a one year contract. Gillis is talking about core guys that the team is built around, guys he's willing to sign to long term contracts: Luongo, Sedins, Kesler, Burrows, Bieksa, Hamhuis, Edler, Malhotra, etc.

As others have said, Gillis is not going to tie up $20-30M on a 4-6 year deal for a player that's "good". Compare Leino/Fleischmann @ 4.5M to Kesler @ 5M. Which would you rather have? One is good, one is great. If you fill up on good players, you have no room left for great ones when the opportunity presents itself.

You can't have a team with only great players -- thus the Sturm signing -- but if you're going to make a commitment to a player, you want him to be great. I fully support that philosophy.
well said. and i fully agree with that philosophy as well.

i just hope Gillis pulls a rabbit out of the hat once again as the offseason rolls along, to acquire a 'great' player.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Drop the Sopel View Post
Excluding this past year where Sturm missed more than half the year he hasn't had a season where he's been on pace for less than 20 goals, in 8 years. He's been an extrememly consistent goalscorer...

Factor in Raymond's situation and this is a great signing IMO. I didn't undertand it at first glance but it's basically a no risk/high reward move. Not to mention his skillset will be a perfect compliment to Vancouver's system.

This signing is the definition of moneypuck.
i see what you're saying and partially agree. it makes sense as a sort of potential 'throwaway' solution to Raymond's completely uncertain timeline for recovery and the fact that we don't know what we're going to get if/when he returns. and with Sturm, if he somehow magically gets his groove back on despite the knees and the age, etc...he could be a nice player to have as depth. if not, you toss him on waivers and hope Raymond steps right back in.

but to me, $2.25M is still a great deal more than i expect on a 'moneypuck' pickup like a Torres/Tambi/Wellwood/Rome/etc. I mean, that's inching dangerously close to the $2.5M that i see him spending on players he seems to view as 'great', like a Samuelsson/Malhotra UFA pickup where he doesn't hesitate to provide term for them.

biturbo19 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:45 PM
  #297
kanuck87
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,940
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiranis View Post
You're not serious, are you? They got better by acquiring Mayers and O'Donnell? do you WATCH hockey?
It's amazingly stupid what Chicago did. Trade Brian Campbell to free up cap space only to end up not using it. They still have 7 million left over with one more spot to fill, and very few options. Now they're out a very good #3 (maybe #2) defenseman, replaced by a couple of bottom-pairing d-man and loads of unused cap space. They're a much worse team for it.

Not smart.

kanuck87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:47 PM
  #298
kanuck87
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 3,940
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by opendoor View Post
No, they're right. As long as Raymond's on LTIR the Canucks can replace his salary.
We'll be able to replace that salary after we spend up to the cap ceiling, which is unlikely at this point.

kanuck87 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:48 PM
  #299
Dado
Moderator
Bourbon & Bacon
 
Dado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver Island
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,404
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYVanfan View Post
Hawks got a whole lot better today
I dont thnk so. Wouldn't be the slightest bit surprised if they missed the playoffs entirely with this motley collection.

Dado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-01-2011, 06:51 PM
  #300
English
Registered User
 
English's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 300
vCash: 500
I like this. Sturm's a good player when healthy and the risk may be worth it.

English is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.