HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Metropolitan Division > Pittsburgh Penguins
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Puck Daddy R&D Camp grades

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-19-2011, 11:05 AM
  #1
Certified Assassin
Souped up Wildcat
 
Certified Assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 543
vCash: 500
Puck Daddy R&D Camp grades

I'm not pushing Puck Daddy material or promoting it, just thought it was a good article to line out the changes being tested this year and it gives insight as to what exactly is going on at the camp. I generally agree with the grades given though.

http://sports.yahoo.com/nhl/blog/puc...rn=nhl-wp10865

Your feedback?

Certified Assassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 12:13 PM
  #2
Riggs
Kaptain
 
Riggs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Pittsburgh
Country: United States
Posts: 3,188
vCash: 500
I really like the curved glass idea... yeah, some odd bounces will be a result, but all the players wear helmets and are subject to random pucks flying into the bench anyway.

Riggs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 12:36 PM
  #3
Shady Machine
Registered User
 
Shady Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 14,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riggs View Post
I really like the curved glass idea... yeah, some odd bounces will be a result, but all the players wear helmets and are subject to random pucks flying into the bench anyway.
Yeah I agree. Great idea. And from that angle, you would most likely only be firing the puck out of zone off that glass so it shouldn't hit the curved part anyway. Possibly dump ins but it should be rare.

I like the verification line as well, although a little weird seeing another painted line. The "bear hug" rule seems pretty stupid. Overall, I agree with Puck Daddy's assessments.

Shady Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 01:29 PM
  #4
Tasty Biscuits
with fancy sauce
 
Tasty Biscuits's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 5,145
vCash: 500
Definitely like the shallow nets idea. Would be nice if they could get that going for this upcoming season.

Tasty Biscuits is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 01:55 PM
  #5
Big McLargehuge
Global Moderator
Bitter Buffalo
 
Big McLargehuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Country: Iceland
Posts: 56,848
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shady Machine View Post
Yeah I agree. Great idea. And from that angle, you would most likely only be firing the puck out of zone off that glass so it shouldn't hit the curved part anyway. Possibly dump ins but it should be rare.

I like the verification line as well, although a little weird seeing another painted line. The "bear hug" rule seems pretty stupid. Overall, I agree with Puck Daddy's assessments.
Same, though I am in favor of taking the shootout up to 5 players (Puck Daddy just said nay because of his hatred for the shootout...which is understandable, I still say it's preferable to ties).

__________________
“The most terrifying fact about the universe is not that it is hostile, but that it is indifferent. If we can come to terms with this indifference and accept the challenges of life within the boundaries of death, our existence as a species can have genuine meaning and fulfillment. However vast the darkness, we must supply our own light.” - Stanley Kubrick
http://sprites.pokecheck.org/i/054.gif
Big McLargehuge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 02:31 PM
  #6
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Like the shallow nets idea. Don't know why it hasn't been implemented sooner.

Don't undestand the point of the verification line. Isn't that what the blue goal line is for?

Don't like curved glass. Good idea in theory, but potential puck bounces may cause problems.

Hybrid icing= literally the dumbest idea I have ever heard regarding NHL rule changes.


I would like them to bring back entire 2 minute power plays.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 02:47 PM
  #7
Shady Machine
Registered User
 
Shady Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 14,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
Like the shallow nets idea. Don't know why it hasn't been implemented sooner.

Don't undestand the point of the verification line. Isn't that what the blue goal line is for?

Don't like curved glass. Good idea in theory, but potential puck bounces may cause problems.

Hybrid icing= literally the dumbest idea I have ever heard regarding NHL rule changes.


I would like them to bring back entire 2 minute power plays.
What don't you get about the verification line? The distance between the goal line (which is often blocked in overhead angles by goalie equipment, etc.) and the verification line is the exact width of a puck (or just a hair wider from what I've read). so if any of the puck is deemed to have touched that line then that must mean it has completely crossed the goal line. What blue goal line are you referring to?

In terms of curved glass, when will someone be shooting at the bench so as to hit the curved glass? I agree deflections are possible, but probably not very often and results less serious than getting your head smashed into the stanchion.

Shady Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 02:51 PM
  #8
mpp9
Registered User
 
mpp9's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Country: United States
Posts: 19,182
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
Like the shallow nets idea. Don't know why it hasn't been implemented sooner.

Don't undestand the point of the verification line. Isn't that what the blue goal line is for?

Don't like curved glass. Good idea in theory, but potential puck bounces may cause problems.

Hybrid icing= literally the dumbest idea I have ever heard regarding NHL rule changes.


I would like them to bring back entire 2 minute power plays.
Verification line is to see if the puck touches it rather than having to see if there's any white between the puck and the goal line. They're also putting clear plastic on top of the net possibly to make it easier to see. Gets the game going quicker which is very important imo.

Curved glass is going to happen either way. The league seems pretty adament about it to avoid any more incidents like the Chara hit. It'll cause strange bounces but it's better than needless concussions.

Hybrid icing will make the linesman's job a bit harder as it'll be up to him whether to blow it down when there's a race for the puck. They're trying to allow for the oppositin to negate the icing if he has a step on the defenseman but if it's obvious that the defenseman will get to it first then why not blow it dead and keep serious injury from occuring.

mpp9 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 02:56 PM
  #9
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shady Machine View Post
What don't you get about the verification line? The distance between the goal line (which is often blocked in overhead angles by goalie equipment, etc.) and the verification line is the exact width of a puck (or just a hair wider from what I've read). so if any of the puck is deemed to have touched that line then that must mean it has completely crossed the goal line. What blue goal line are you referring to?

In terms of curved glass, when will someone be shooting at the bench so as to hit the curved glass? I agree deflections are possible, but probably not very often and results less serious than getting your head smashed into the stanchion.
I meant red goal line.

There's nothing that the verification line does that the red goal line does not do. If there is confusion that the puck crossed the red line, there will be confusion if it touched the verification line. Pointless, imo.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 02:59 PM
  #10
JordanStaal#1Fan
Registered User
 
JordanStaal#1Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Asbestos, Qc
Country: Canada
Posts: 15,552
vCash: 1012
Why don't they just put a chip in the puck? Or why don't they develop something similair to tennis's hawkeye?

JordanStaal#1Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:02 PM
  #11
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpp9 View Post
Verification line is to see if the puck touches it rather than having to see if there's any white between the puck and the goal line. They're also putting clear plastic on top of the net possibly to make it easier to see. Gets the game going quicker which is very important imo.

Curved glass is going to happen either way. The league seems pretty adament about it to avoid any more incidents like the Chara hit. It'll cause strange bounces but it's better than needless concussions.

Hybrid icing will make the linesman's job a bit harder as it'll be up to him whether to blow it down when there's a race for the puck. They're trying to allow for the oppositin to negate the icing if he has a step on the defenseman but if it's obvious that the defenseman will get to it first then why not blow it dead and keep serious injury from occuring.
More often than not it will be a very close race. It's also a strange concept that if player A wins this call then you keep on skating, but if player B wins then the play is whistled down. That just sounds stupid to me. Some of these injuries can be stopped if the refs enforced more hits from behind and boarding calls during races for icing calls.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:02 PM
  #12
Shady Machine
Registered User
 
Shady Machine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 14,337
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
I meant red goal line.

There's nothing that the verification line does that the red goal line does not do. If there is confusion that the puck crossed the red line, there will be confusion if it touched the verification line. Pointless, imo.
Fair enough. I think it just increases the odds (even if slightly) that a goal will be called correctly. To me, it's at a better angle of sight from above camera views. I guess if anything, it doesn't hurt the game in any way so why not try it?

Shady Machine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:04 PM
  #13
Uemoda
Formerly OminousGrey
 
Uemoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Country: United States
Posts: 3,165
vCash: 500
Hey guys, question.

When would we know if they implement these things for next season? Apparently, the curved glass is supposed to be installed in each arena this year, but what about the shallow nets, thinner mesh, etc? When would they let us know?

Uemoda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:09 PM
  #14
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shady Machine View Post
Fair enough. I think it just increases the odds (even if slightly) that a goal will be called correctly. To me, it's at a better angle of sight from above camera views. I guess if anything, it doesn't hurt the game in any way so why not try it?
I agree it doesn't hurt to try. Another way of helping determine a goal may be to put cameras inside the posts? One camera at each corner, facing downward, or perhaps 1 camera at each post at ice level.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:12 PM
  #15
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Perhaps this should go in the Rags board but did anyone else notice the big CITI sign on the plexi glass behind the nets at Madison Square Garden? Does anyone know if these signs hinder the view of the people behind them? I would be pissed if that sign was in my way.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:17 PM
  #16
Jeff Goldblum
Registered User
 
Jeff Goldblum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Country: United States
Posts: 7,910
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
Perhaps this should go in the Rags board but did anyone else notice the big CITI sign on the plexi glass behind the nets at Madison Square Garden? Does anyone know if these signs hinder the view of the people behind them? I would be pissed if that sign was in my way.
Those ads do not obstruct anyone's view because they're not really there. 'Virtual Advertisements' are only visible on TV.

Jeff Goldblum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:57 PM
  #17
Certified Assassin
Souped up Wildcat
 
Certified Assassin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: West Virginia
Country: United States
Posts: 543
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ominous Grey View Post
Hey guys, question.

When would we know if they implement these things for next season? Apparently, the curved glass is supposed to be installed in each arena this year, but what about the shallow nets, thinner mesh, etc? When would they let us know?
Rumor is they are to try the shallow nets this pre-season. As far as being implemented permanently, I have no idea of the process that is involved.

Certified Assassin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 03:59 PM
  #18
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff Goldblum View Post
Those ads do not obstruct anyone's view because they're not really there. 'Virtual Advertisements' are only visible on TV.
Well I just learned something new.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 04:03 PM
  #19
TravisUlrich
Eternal Optimist
 
TravisUlrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Thunder Bay, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 12,866
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
I meant red goal line.

There's nothing that the verification line does that the red goal line does not do. If there is confusion that the puck crossed the red line, there will be confusion if it touched the verification line. Pointless, imo.
Many times you can't tell of the puck is "all the way over" the redline or you'll see the puck in the net but under a goalie's glove or pad and there's no video evidence that it's all the way over the redline. This way, if the puck is touching the green line you can tell that even though you can't see the back half of the puck, it's all the way over the line.

TravisUlrich is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 04:18 PM
  #20
Freeptop
Registered User
 
Freeptop's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Country: United States
Posts: 1,065
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
I meant red goal line.

There's nothing that the verification line does that the red goal line does not do. If there is confusion that the puck crossed the red line, there will be confusion if it touched the verification line. Pointless, imo.
The goal line is frequently obscured by players and by the net itself. How many times were they trying to determine if there was any white ice visible between the puck and the goal line during reviews last season? Just for the Pens, no less? The verification line provides an easy way to verify that the puck has completely cleared the goal line without having to find some sliver of white between the puck and a scuffed-up goal line. If the verification line is just a touch past a puck-width beyond the goal line, then there shouldn't need to be nearly the level of scrutiny involved in determining whether it touched the line or not - if it's close enough to wonder, that would mean the puck had definitely cleared the goal line.

It should aid video review in a number of cases. Sure, it isn't fool-proof, but it's cheap, easy, and doesn't change any rules.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JordanStaal#1Fan View Post
Why don't they just put a chip in the puck? Or why don't they develop something similair to tennis's hawkeye?
The League claims they've tried putting a chip in the puck, but weren't able to get a puck that had the proper characteristics. I can believe that - despite what people think, sensors like that aren't 100% accurate. Inside a hockey arena, there's plenty of opportunities for interference and radio reflections, not to mention the basic fact that those kinds of tracking systems are not as accurate as people tend to think.

Consider that even a 1 inch error would mean that such a system would be useless for the situations that the verification line is meant to handle. And a 1 inch margin of error would be phenomenal for that kind of sensor.

As for something like tennis' hawkeye - that doesn't work too well if the problem is that the puck was obscured by the bodies of players or the net itself. Without being able to track what the puck may or may not have bounced off of, a computer can't accurately tell you where the puck is (and a single camera in the net is not sufficient to accurately track a puck in 3D). Tennis has a lot less to obstruct the vision of the cameras.


As for the rest of it:

At first, I thought the shallower nets could be interesting. After watching the video showing them on NHL.com, I'm looking forward to them testing them out in pre-season games - not only do they create more space behind the net, but they were designed to be tougher for someone to knock off the mooring by shoving at the net from behind. Add that to the clear panels that allow greater visibility around the goal-line and the HD cameras (both of which they should put in even if they don't change the depth of the net), and I'm all for it.

The curved glass needs to happen. An occasional odd deflection is worth it to improve safety.

The rest of it needs more time in testing, or needs to go straight to the trash bin, IMO.

Freeptop is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 04:49 PM
  #21
Darth Vitale
Moderator
Dark Matter
 
Darth Vitale's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Victoryville
Country: United States
Posts: 25,779
vCash: 500
Good article, thanks for linking to it. I pretty much agree with everything he said and for this year I think there is zero excuse for not doing the following:

Curved glass at end of benches - Shanny made it sound like this was likely / planned.

Goal-related changes - confirmation line, clear top, HD camera, shallower

Face-off Penalty line - really good idea IMO

7 minute OT, 4v4 + 3v3, but I'd make it 5 minutes of 4v4, 2 minutes of 3v3 because it becomes too much like pond hockey / rat hockey at that point. More of a skills competition than legit test of teams. Not a fan of 5 player Shootout. No need to draw that process out more than it is drawn out already.


Ideas that suck bigtime:

No clearing the puck on PK:
Are you ****ing kidding me? At the worst it should be what Disco said, you get maybe 3 clears and then you get penalized again. It's giving the offensive team too much of an advantage otherwise. If you can't make them chase it / keep them honest at the blue line, most PKs are going to get pwned on a pretty regular basis. After a minute+ they're going to get totally run ragged. Bad idea. I like the challenge of the PP / PK for both teams as it's currently set up. If it ain't broke...

Hybrid Icing:
Hey I got an idea, since we don't have enough gray area to argue about with headshots and high hits and judging of intention, let's add more gray area and let the refs make an arbitrary decision that's based on nothing but instinct! Real simple: if you want to cut out those injuries, mandate automatic suspensions for anyone who runs a player into the boards (accidental or not) on the icing chase. Make players take responsibility for their speed and positioning at that moment and the rest will take care of itself. This is the same rule that should be applied to head shots. Mandatory. Just as with high sticking to the face, intention is irrelevant. Just match the suspension to the severity of the outcome of the play and to any pattern of behavior with these type of hits. Guys like Richards, Cooke, Ovy get a shorter leash, etc.

Darth Vitale is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 06:12 PM
  #22
Mancouver
Locked in the Washer
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kampuchia
Posts: 3,595
vCash: 500
What happened to the chichi who made funny jokes? Hmm? Where did he go?

Mancouver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 06:20 PM
  #23
Ziggyjoe21
Registered User
 
Ziggyjoe21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Pitt
Country: Ukraine
Posts: 7,332
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Ziggyjoe21
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisUlrich View Post
Many times you can't tell of the puck is "all the way over" the redline or you'll see the puck in the net but under a goalie's glove or pad and there's no video evidence that it's all the way over the redline. This way, if the puck is touching the green line you can tell that even though you can't see the back half of the puck, it's all the way over the line.
If something is obstructing the view over the goal line, it's just as likely that it will be obstructing the verification line.

Like I said before, it doesn't hurt to try it, but I just don't think it will help in any way.

Ziggyjoe21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 06:46 PM
  #24
Ogrezilla
Nerf Herder
 
Ogrezilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 35,328
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ziggyjoe21 View Post
If something is obstructing the view over the goal line, it's just as likely that it will be obstructing the verification line.

Like I said before, it doesn't hurt to try it, but I just don't think it will help in any way.
But now both would need to be obstructed. There is nothing but positive about it.

Ogrezilla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
08-19-2011, 06:56 PM
  #25
eXile59
Shirts on.
 
eXile59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 16,696
vCash: 500
Please get rid of the trapezoids and no to 3 on 3 in over time. 3 on 3 would be nice for an exhibition like the all-star game. Also like the faceoff penalty idea. Cheating at faceoffs has gotten out of control and if you get waived out the next just does the same thing.

eXile59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:31 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2015 All Rights Reserved.