HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > San Jose Sharks
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Demers for Clutterbuck

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-13-2011, 05:18 PM
  #1
couturefan39
Registered User
 
couturefan39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,103
vCash: 500
Demers for Clutterbuck

http://insidehockey.com/will-sharks-...-it-a-trifecta

Would you or not? I don't think i would. I'd rather trade Braun than Demers.

couturefan39 is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:19 PM
  #2
sjshark91
Registered User
 
sjshark91's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Country:
Posts: 27,036
vCash: 500
This source legit?

sjshark91 is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:21 PM
  #3
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,877
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by couturefan39 View Post
http://insidehockey.com/will-sharks-...-it-a-trifecta

Would you or not? I don't think i would. I'd rather trade Braun than Demers.
Absolutely not. Demers is far more valuable than Clutterbuck. Young top-4 d-men are far more rare than young 3rd liners.

That said, I would love to have Clutterbuck, and I might sacrifice Braun, but hell no I'm not sending Demers. Remember, Demers is our backup for when Boyle retires. And what if Burn's doesn't re-sign? We'd be left without a defense of any sort.

hockeyball is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:21 PM
  #4
WestCoast
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,374
vCash: 500
I would, Clutterbuck is probably the premier 3rd line checking winger in the game right now, the dude is a force and has been and will continue to be one of the major leaders in hits.

WestCoast is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:21 PM
  #5
sweHockeypunk21
Registered User
 
sweHockeypunk21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: CALI
Country: Sweden
Posts: 896
vCash: 500
That would make our 3rd line legit, however I love the idea of 5 top 4 dman.

sweHockeypunk21 is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:23 PM
  #6
hockeyball
Registered User
 
hockeyball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 18,877
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
This source legit?
It's not even a source, it's random babble with absolutely no substance.

hockeyball is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:23 PM
  #7
CommanderShepard15
Eberle=Clutch
 
CommanderShepard15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,430
vCash: 500
The Minn Jose Wilarks?

CommanderShepard15 is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:24 PM
  #8
Arrch
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: NorCal
Country: United States
Posts: 4,448
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by sjshark91 View Post
This source legit?
It's just the writers opinion of what would be a good trade.

But no, bad idea. Top 4 defensemen are harder to come by than 3rd line utility players.

Arrch is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:24 PM
  #9
SactoShark
💤
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 10,245
vCash: 3000
Negative, Ghost Rider, the pattern is full.

SactoShark is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:30 PM
  #10
CommanderShepard15
Eberle=Clutch
 
CommanderShepard15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 4,430
vCash: 500
That said. i would do Braun + 3rd or something for Clutterbuck

CommanderShepard15 is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:39 PM
  #11
Thorntonfan97
Jose Bautista: 7 HR
 
Thorntonfan97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Halifax, NS
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,370
vCash: 233
Send a message via MSN to Thorntonfan97 Send a message via Yahoo to Thorntonfan97
I would not do this trade...

Thorntonfan97 is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:40 PM
  #12
magic school bus
***********
 
magic school bus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 17,031
vCash: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeyball View Post
It's not even a source, it's random babble with absolutely no substance.
not really. if DW was being truthful about using Braun on the right side, then Demers could be out. he's been replaced by Burns.

i would not do the trade. i love JD.

magic school bus is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:41 PM
  #13
one2gamble
Registered User
 
one2gamble's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,067
vCash: 500
No No No

one2gamble is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:41 PM
  #14
SacLandshark
Registered User
 
SacLandshark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 173
vCash: 500
talk of any trade aside, I'd LOVE to have clutterbuck on the team - just the kinda guy we need...

and saying clutterbuck is so fun...

SacLandshark is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:43 PM
  #15
Slipstar
Registered User
 
Slipstar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 433
vCash: 500
Hey, I know that author.

But, related, just thinking about that hypothetical deal makes me nauseous. Ehrhoff flashbacks.

Slipstar is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:45 PM
  #16
SactoShark
💤
 
SactoShark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Sacramento
Posts: 10,245
vCash: 3000
Yeah, it's nothing against Clutterbuck, but we need Demers' skills / contract right now.

SactoShark is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:45 PM
  #17
FrizzleFry22
Registered User
 
FrizzleFry22's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Jose
Posts: 639
vCash: 500
No..

FrizzleFry22 is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 05:59 PM
  #18
rideaucrusher21
Registered User
 
rideaucrusher21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: CA
Country: United States
Posts: 680
vCash: 500
no. awful deal.

Any future acquisition will cost non-roster assets for sure. I would be down with Clutterbuck for a pick.

rideaucrusher21 is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:02 PM
  #19
Tkachuk4MVP
24 Years of Fail
 
Tkachuk4MVP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 10,188
vCash: 500
Don't like that idea AT ALL.

Tkachuk4MVP is online now  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:04 PM
  #20
Spacemania
Recovering Spammer
 
Spacemania's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Signpost Forest, YT
Country: United Nations
Posts: 28,309
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Spacemania
I vote clutterbuck only because I love the name

__________________

When you do things right, people won't be sure if you've done anything at all.
Spacemania is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:09 PM
  #21
The Architect
When weasels fly...
 
The Architect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,424
vCash: 500
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOooooooooooooooooo oooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOoo ooooooooooooooooooooooOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOoooooooooooooo!

No. No. No.

The Architect is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:09 PM
  #22
SJeasy
Registered User
 
SJeasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: San Jose
Country: United States
Posts: 12,538
vCash: 500
The article went over all of the negative comments that have been made so far. It didn't dismiss them. What I don't see is research on the part of posters here.

5on5
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stati...24+25+26+27+28

4on5 (PK)
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stati...24+25+26+27+28

Almost stellar PK. Very solid possession stats on a team that didn't do well with possession.

If Demers is playing third pairing, it is something to think about and at least not a fantasy that ignores reality. IMO, it is a win now move.

SJeasy is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:13 PM
  #23
SJSharks2010
Registered User
 
SJSharks2010's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Sudbury, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,102
vCash: 500
No. I don't mind the idea of moving Jason to improve our forward depth, but that's totally lopsided.

SJSharks2010 is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:14 PM
  #24
The Architect
When weasels fly...
 
The Architect's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,424
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by SJeasy View Post
The article went over all of the negative comments that have been made so far. It didn't dismiss them. What I don't see is research on the part of posters here.

5on5
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stati...24+25+26+27+28

4on5 (PK)
http://www.behindthenet.ca/nhl_stati...24+25+26+27+28

Almost stellar PK. Very solid possession stats on a team that didn't do well with possession.

If Demers is playing third pairing, it is something to think about and at least not a fantasy that ignores reality. IMO, it is a win now move.
A win now move that could be extremely crippling in the long term. If we don't sign Burns I'm worried as is, but if he were to leave we'd be essentially left with:

Murray - Boyle
Vlasic - Braun
Prospect - Prospect, and even Braun is a prospect.

I'd do it for Braun over Demers. I just see something special when it comes to Demers. I value him as our 3rd most important Dman right now, with Burns and Boyle being above him.

The Architect is offline  
Old
07-13-2011, 06:14 PM
  #25
DrFeelgood
Chairman Meow
 
DrFeelgood's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: San Jose, CA
Country: United States
Posts: 18,974
vCash: 500
No. I like Clutterbuck, but not at the cost of Demers.

DrFeelgood is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:00 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.