HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk
Trade Rumors and Free Agent Talk Trade rumors, transactions, and free agent talk. Rumors must contain the word RUMOR in post title. Proposals must contain the word PROPOSAL in post title.

Jack Campbell

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
07-18-2011, 04:52 PM
  #1
DallasStarsfan06
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 265
vCash: 500
Jack Campbell

I know the Stars will probably not trade him, but what could he fetch us?
Could we get a similar prospect in return? His value might be a little low possibly because of his first season with Windsor. So again I know most likely Dallas will not trade him, I am just wondering what he is worth.

DallasStarsfan06 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:10 PM
  #2
TradeBait
Registered User
 
TradeBait's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 440
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by DallasStarsfan06 View Post
I know the Stars will probably not trade him, but what could he fetch us?
Could we get a similar prospect in return? His value might be a little low possibly because of his first season with Windsor. So again I know most likely Dallas will not trade him, I am just wondering what he is worth.
Cambell for E. Kane straight up?

TradeBait is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:12 PM
  #3
BrianBoyle
Nash goes HAM
 
BrianBoyle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: On the grass
Country: United States
Posts: 51,725
vCash: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeydude35 View Post
Cambell for E. Kane straight up?
The Jets have Ondrej Pavelec.

Besides, goaltending prospects generally aren't all too valuable. You're not getting anything close to E. Kane with Campbell himself.

__________________

Neutral Milk Hotel are literally GOAT
Amy Poehler <3

Credit to Ail for the sig.
BrianBoyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:13 PM
  #4
Brand New Stars
Registered User
 
Brand New Stars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: McKinney/C-Stat, TX
Country: United States
Posts: 2,874
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by hockeydude35 View Post
Cambell for E. Kane straight up?
Wouldn't ever happen but I would be all over that.

Brand New Stars is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:15 PM
  #5
vipernsx
Flatus Expeller
 
vipernsx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Country: United States
Posts: 6,117
vCash: 566
IMO a frickin TON. This kid is a stud goalie and a definite franchise goalie to be. He's a HUGE reason why US won goal at the U20 WJC and he was 17. Kid has ice in his veins and talent galore. I wanted the Rangers to pick him so bad.

He's not your average goalie prospect.

vipernsx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:16 PM
  #6
DropIt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Red Deer, AB
Posts: 1,504
vCash: 500
I think its a little quick to jump ship on Campbell. He was on a pretty poor defensive team this season and got a lot of scoring chances given up against him. Also, a lot of good goalies drafted in the first round have had a rough first season after being drafted, he will most likely bounce back next season.

DropIt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:20 PM
  #7
BLBarmada
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,385
vCash: 500
He would probably get atleast a 1st (Look at Varlamov).

He is an unproven prospect( No pro experience is what I mean).


People forget that he took a depleted Spitfires team to the Conference finals last year, and that he was making an adjustment to the OHL (much better league the the U) and he battled confidence issues which are IMO huge for a goalie.

Dallas would be dumb to trade him but a first round pick+ is the starting point at the very least.

BLBarmada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:30 PM
  #8
Sojourn
Global Moderator
Where's the kaboom?
 
Sojourn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Country: United States
Posts: 23,577
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTLjunior View Post
He would probably get atleast a 1st (Look at Varlamov).

He is an unproven prospect( No pro experience is what I mean).


People forget that he took a depleted Spitfires team to the Conference finals last year, and that he was making an adjustment to the OHL (much better league the the U) and he battled confidence issues which are IMO huge for a goalie.

Dallas would be dumb to trade him but a first round pick+ is the starting point at the very least.
Varlamov had pro experience to help his value.

I don't think Campbell has all that much value going for him right now. Certainly not enough for Dallas to be interested in moving him. What he could become is more valuable to them than what he could be moved for.

Sojourn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:31 PM
  #9
Phion Keneuf
Top Dawg Ent.
 
Phion Keneuf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Vaughan, Ontario
Country: Italy
Posts: 27,079
vCash: 500
i could see a deal based around Comeau + Bailey for Campbell (+?)

Phion Keneuf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:35 PM
  #10
Loso
Registered User
 
Loso's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,028
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phion Keneuf View Post
i could see a deal based around Comeau + Bailey for Campbell (+?)
NYI has awesome goalie prospect depth so I doubt they'd be interested tbh.

Loso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:39 PM
  #11
Pavelec4MVP
MVP! MVP! MVP!
 
Pavelec4MVP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Your Mind
Posts: 30,793
vCash: 50
maybe a mid level prospect
I laugh when people say a last or 1st +

get with it
goalie prospects dont fetch ****

__________________
Most Valuable Player
Most Valuable Player

Most Valuable Player
Most Valuable Player
Pavelec4MVP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 06:42 PM
  #12
MetalGodAOD
Moderator
Star Rangers
 
MetalGodAOD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: New York City
Country: United States
Posts: 10,931
vCash: 500
Probably not much. As has been said, goalie prospects aren't worth much and his value is an all time low after his season in Windsor. I'd say a low level 1st based on his WJC alone, but as you said, he wouldn't be traded.

MetalGodAOD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 07:32 PM
  #13
HockeyGuruPitka
Registered User
 
HockeyGuruPitka's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,017
vCash: 500
A late first iin the 2011 draft. Was bad in windsor and in thhe wjc ths last year. Not progressing, reggressiingg. This does not mean he's not going to rebound, jjust one of those typical more valuable to hs current team then any other.

HockeyGuruPitka is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 07:36 PM
  #14
Iamok
#Panic
 
Iamok's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 6,407
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyGuruPitka View Post
A late first iin the 2011 draft. Was bad in windsor and in thhe wjc ths last year. Not progressing, reggressiingg. This does not mean he's not going to rebound, jjust one of those typical more valuable to hs current team then any other.
So is that with, or without, the time machine?

Iamok is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 07:41 PM
  #15
wedge
Registered User
 
wedge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: victoriaville
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,241
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by HockeyGuruPitka View Post
A late first iin the 2011 draft. Was bad in windsor and in thhe wjc ths last year. Not progressing, reggressiingg. This does not mean he's not going to rebound, jjust one of those typical more valuable to hs current team then any other.
he was named top goalie of the tournament.

wedge is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 08:51 PM
  #16
Zih
Dater's Gonna Hate
 
Zih's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Colorado
Country: United States
Posts: 2,265
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTLjunior View Post
He would probably get atleast a 1st (Look at Varlamov).
Using the Colorado Avalanche to establish trade value is like using the New York Rangers to establish how much players should be paid.

Zih is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 09:17 PM
  #17
Rhodes 81
Moderator
grit those teeth
 
Rhodes 81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Atlanta
Country: United States
Posts: 12,178
vCash: 500
not much. there aren't many teams that need a goalie prospect right now.

even if you find a team that wants him, the best you could probably hope for is a 2nd liner or something similar. goalie prospects rarely get traded for much because quite frankly, goalies in general usually aren't worth much in trades for whatever of a multitude of reasons.

i still have no idea why dallas drafted him right after they traded for lehtonen.

also anyone who thinks he could get kane is out of their mind, and varlamov has proven a lot more than jack has.

Rhodes 81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 10:12 PM
  #18
ReginKarlssonLehner
Classless, no rispek
 
ReginKarlssonLehner's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 20,165
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by vipernsx View Post
IMO a frickin TON. This kid is a stud goalie and a definite franchise goalie to be. He's a HUGE reason why US won goal at the U20 WJC and he was 17. Kid has ice in his veins and talent galore. I wanted the Rangers to pick him so bad.

He's not your average goalie prospect.
Too bad you have to settle for Lundqvist for more seasons to come.














ReginKarlssonLehner is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 10:23 PM
  #19
piqued
Global Moderator
 
piqued's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Dallas
Country: United States
Posts: 29,769
vCash: 25678
The value of a goalie prospect after draft day is like driving a new car off the lot and running into a lamp post. It doesn't get built back up until the player has had success at the NHL level.

piqued is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 10:53 PM
  #20
mikeyeightseven
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 173
vCash: 500
whats the value of Calvin Pickard? obviously a bit below campbell but they were ranked 1 and 2 in their draft years (Pickard #1, Campbell #2)

mikeyeightseven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 11:18 PM
  #21
BLBarmada
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zih View Post
Using the Colorado Avalanche to establish trade value is like using the New York Rangers to establish how much players should be paid.
Ya but that trade drove up the value of Campbell.

BLBarmada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-18-2011, 11:47 PM
  #22
bruinsfan46
Registered User
 
bruinsfan46's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: London, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,903
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTLjunior View Post
He would probably get atleast a 1st (Look at Varlamov).

He is an unproven prospect( No pro experience is what I mean).


People forget that he took a depleted Spitfires team to the Conference finals last year, and that he was making an adjustment to the OHL (much better league the the U) and he battled confidence issues which are IMO huge for a goalie.

Dallas would be dumb to trade him but a first round pick+ is the starting point at the very least.
That depleted Spitfires team scored 280 goals, seven less than league leading Mississauga. Everything Windsor accomplished this year was in spite of Campbell, not because of him. Which is exactly why Dallas would never trade him right now, you don't sell prospects low when you don't have to.

bruinsfan46 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 12:29 AM
  #23
Ogi1Kenobi
Registered User
 
Ogi1Kenobi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,131
vCash: 500
GMJN has a huge mancrush on Jack Campbell and his stellar performance at the WJC. I strongly believe that's the reason why he chose him over Fowler.

Ogi1Kenobi is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 12:31 AM
  #24
BLBarmada
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Quebec
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,385
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by bruinsfan46 View Post
That depleted Spitfires team scored 280 goals, seven less than league leading Mississauga. Everything Windsor accomplished this year was in spite of Campbell, not because of him. Which is exactly why Dallas would never trade him right now, you don't sell prospects low when you don't have to.


Come on you and I know that they lost alot of talent. They were a fowler and shugg away from going to the memorial cup.

BLBarmada is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 12:45 AM
  #25
Slatsmsg
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Airdrie
Posts: 548
vCash: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zih View Post
Using the Colorado Avalanche to establish trade value is like using the New York Rangers to establish how much players should be paid.
haha awesome

Slatsmsg is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.