HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Eastern Conference > Northeast Division > Toronto Maple Leafs
Notices

Which assets for Parise?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
07-19-2011, 09:17 AM
  #26
Corleone
Registered User
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Peterborough
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,915
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Corleone
Parise scores 20 - 30 points more a year... that's a small gap? That gap would get us into playoffs. Just because we gave up alot for Kessel shouldn't make him untouchable.

Ah well, one can dream.

Corleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:20 AM
  #27
Augustus
Non basta una vita.
 
Augustus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Roma in my soul.
Country: Italy
Posts: 12,933
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muhammad Aulie View Post
kadri + gardiner/blacker + 1st

nothing more
that is quite a bit of our future for an admittedly very good player.

__________________
Noah Cross: 'Course I'm respectable. I'm old. Politicians, ugly buildings, and whores all get respectable if they last long enough.
Timothy Fenwick Jr: Do you ever get the feeling that there's something going on that we don't know about?
Boogie: If you don't have good dreams, Bagel, you got nightmares.
Augustus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:21 AM
  #28
Corleone
Registered User
 
Corleone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Peterborough
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,915
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Corleone
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULF_55 View Post
I think Parise is UFA next year if he signs a 1 year deal.

If he really wants to play in Toronto ... be patient.

If he doesn't he wouldn't sign long term here, making the trade a non-starter.
This is true, but I'm sure NJ wants to get something for him, eitherway. Burke is a magnet for some of these American players. Parise is half Canadian too, but it would take a sign and trade for Burke to do anything.


Corleone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:29 AM
  #29
Porn*
Registered User
 
Porn*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: In your nightmares
Country: Israel
Posts: 31,934
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Porn*
no thanks... he's great, but i dont feel like giving up 3-4 sold assets for him.

Porn* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:33 AM
  #30
Interactif
Burn The Boats
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corleone View Post
I heard that Parise isn't happy there though, they haven't even named a coach. I usually follow the Devils, they're my 2nd favorite team. Parise plays hard and would improve everything about this team, including attitude. I would love to have both though.

To the people adding in Kulemin, that's just crazy. Kulemin is our best player.
Go to this thread, I am getting tired of explaining Parise is a one year rental currently when I say I would not trade Kulemin for him straight up unless Parise is guaranteed to sign with the Leafs next year long term. Even some so called Leafs fans can't understand this concept.

http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p...3#post35162233

Interactif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:40 AM
  #31
LeafsFan2342
#CallupColborne
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,100
vCash: 500

Zach Parise


Clarke MacArthur
Jussi Rynnas
Carl Gunnarsson
2012 2nd round pick
2012 3rd round pick

Reason being Parise was injured for pretty much the whole season, but these are assets that the Leafs can part with that would benefit New Jersey as well. MacArthur is a great LW, Rynnas helps fill the void in net once Brodeur and Hedberg are gone, Gunnarsson helps their defense and then the two picks are just parts to finish of the deal.

LeafsFan2342 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:42 AM
  #32
mooseOAK*
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 42,437
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by atlaskneels View Post
Leaf fans, if you were in GM Brian Burke's shoes, what would you be willing to part with for an unsigned Zach Parise?
Somewhere less than stupid.

mooseOAK* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:42 AM
  #33
Leafssss
Registered User
 
Leafssss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 4,078
vCash: 500
There's a chance Parise is a UFA next year, we can just get him then.

Leafssss is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:49 AM
  #34
donkeyy0
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interactif View Post
Go to this thread, I am getting tired of explaining Parise is a one year rental currently when I say I would not trade Kulemin for him straight up unless Parise is guaranteed to sign with the Leafs next year long term. Even some so called Leafs fans can't understand this concept.

http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?p...3#post35162233
On that thread...don't bother responding to GM17...he's just trolling Leafs fans. It's a waste of time to try to argue logically or illogically. He's just going to troll.

donkeyy0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:52 AM
  #35
The Naz
With God given hands
 
The Naz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hamilton, Ontario
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,552
vCash: 500
This is what I'd be willing to do, addressing what I think are their needs without killing our team too much.

Kulemin, Colbourne, Gardiner/Gunnarson, possibly throw in a 1st, prefer not to.

Kulemin is an NHL ready, young player with more upside and complete game.

Colbourne is a top 6 center prospect, which they could use.

Gardiner/Gunnarson address the need for mobility in their D core. Gardiner may have more PP upside, but is unproven, Gunnar is proven to be at least a solid 2way player with possibly more PP upside to him.

If they want a 1st, I'd dig around for a small return from them. Possibly a bottom 6 center prospect, maybe someone like David Wohlberg. He's likely a 4th line center with some real grit to his game.

Its not that I would move Kadri for Parise, or even Schenn, but I think these players address needs for them. I'd be fine switching Colbourne for Kadri, but be more reluctant to move the 1st. If I add Schenn, it changes everything, as IMO he holds more value then everyone but Parise in the deal.

The Naz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 09:53 AM
  #36
Interactif
Burn The Boats
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkeyy0 View Post
On that thread...don't bother responding to GM17...he's just trolling Leafs fans. It's a waste of time to try to argue logically or illogically. He's just going to troll.
Thanks for the heads up, I notice there are quite a bevy of trolls outside the Leafs board. I think we have the most intelligent fanbase out there, the true leafs fans that is, but obviously there are some that disguise themselves as fans but are anything but.

Interactif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 10:03 AM
  #37
donkeyy0
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interactif View Post
Thanks for the heads up, I notice there are quite a bevy of trolls outside the Leafs board. I think we have the most intelligent fanbase out there, the true leafs fans that is, but obviously there are some that disguise themselves as fans but are anything but.
Agreed. They all seemed to misinterpret your point though. Perhaps you could've done a better job explaining it, or maybe they just have blinders on and want to rip on Leafs fans.

Kuli is the Leafs best forward in my opinion. I'd still offer him for Parise, but not much more. The knee injury really scares me though.

donkeyy0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 10:05 AM
  #38
Man Hole Inspector*
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 2,730
vCash: 500
Jeff Carter (#11 overall in 2003 draft)
461GP 181G 162A 343P
0.74 PPG

Mike Richards (#24 overall in 2003 draft)
453GP 133G 216A 349P
0.77

Zach Parise (#17 overall in 2003 draft)
420GP 163G 178A 341P
0.81

Therefore I can see Parise getting traded for a similar package to both players if the Devils have no other choice.

Schenn + Simmonds + 2nd FOR Mike Richards

Voracek + Courturier + Nick Cousins FOR Jeff Carter


Top prospect + Top 6 player + decent-good prospect/pick

Man Hole Inspector* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 10:09 AM
  #39
donkeyy0
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 1,258
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Man Hole Inspector View Post
Jeff Carter (#11 overall in 2003 draft)
461GP 181G 162A 343P
0.74 PPG

Mike Richards (#24 overall in 2003 draft)
453GP 133G 216A 349P
0.77

Zach Parise (#17 overall in 2003 draft)
420GP 163G 178A 341P
0.81

Therefore I can see Parise getting traded for a similar package to both players if the Devils have no other choice.

Schenn + Simmonds + 2nd FOR Mike Richards

Voracek + Courturier + Nick Cousins FOR Jeff Carter
What was the asking price for Richards from Burke? Kadri + Kulemin? That would be the absolute max I offer if it involved Kuli.

And I think centers hold more value than wingers...andddd Richards/Carter are both on long term contracts rather than potentially a 1 year deal.

It's far more risky dealing for Parise (contract uncertainty and a major knee injury) than it is for Richards/Carter. But you're probably right in that those are the kind of packages it's going to take.

donkeyy0 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 10:28 AM
  #40
Interactif
Burn The Boats
 
Interactif's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: North York
Country: Canada
Posts: 14,528
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by donkeyy0 View Post
Agreed. They all seemed to misinterpret your point though. Perhaps you could've done a better job explaining it, or maybe they just have blinders on and want to rip on Leafs fans.

Kuli is the Leafs best forward in my opinion. I'd still offer him for Parise, but not much more. The knee injury really scares me though.
He's a relatively small guy also, you just don't know how much wear and tear that body has endured since he plays a bigger game than his size would indicate. I'm very mindful that he may not return to form, but if he does it would be a risk a team may be willing to risk.

Interactif is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 10:34 AM
  #41
TyBOZAK*
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Brampton, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,091
vCash: 500
Pass, rather not trade away a core of prospects/ picks.

TyBOZAK* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 11:36 AM
  #42
ponder
Registered User
 
ponder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,606
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Leafmon1 View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponder View Post
I highly, highly expect him to re-sign with New Jersey, he's their franchise player and Lou is good at getting deals done. Don't expect him to make it to arbitration.

With that being said, in the off chance that Lou and Parise simply cannot agree on a contract (what's their cap situation like?), and if Parise is perfectly healthy, I'd love to go after his rights, as long as there was a pre-worked-out deal with the Parise camp (similar to what we did with Kessel), for a contract that was fair for a player like Parise, but not insanely high.

Trying to stay realistic, NJ would have good LWs even without Parise (Kovalchuk and Tedenby), but strong needs at basically every other position. I think Kessel would be the center-piece, and he'd have to be paired with one or two sweeteners. Something like:

Kessel
+
one of Colborne, Gardiner, Blacker, Percy, Gunnarsson or Franson
+
one of Scrivens or Rynnas


I'm a big Parise fan, and would do the above deal (in any form, even Kessel + Colborne + Scrivens for Parise), but only just, I wouldn't want to add more, that would be more of a "final offer, hope nobody else offers better" type of deal. Again, this would only be for a healthy Parise, who is willing to re-sign on a fair but not nuts contract.
Why would you do this? Not gonna flame ya here, but plz explain...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bodybr3ak View Post
I understand that its gonna take more then we want but I think dishing out kessel for Parise is a bit of step backwards. I think it would another draft pick type deal were we hope we get the better end with having a top line that consists of the two best American snipers in the league so the devs get suck with some low 20s picks. Would anyone do our next two 1sts?
Quote:
Originally Posted by blader258 View Post
Why the heck are people dangling Kessel in these ridiculous proposals. Talk about 2 steps backwards.
a) Parise is a superstar, the two seasons before his injury he was a top 10 player in the league, and he's just 26, if he's indeed fully healthy but NJ are still looking to trade him (something I seriously doubt happens), then he's going to command a GREAT return. No packages built around Kadri or MacArthur, there has to be a serious centerpiece coming back, because other teams will offer a serious centerpiece. Something like Kessel, IMO

b) From our point of view, Kessel is a talented but flawed player. Great skater, unreal shot, nice hands in general, but he's trash along the boards, trash in puck battles, plays poor defense, not exactly a "battler" type, there's just a lot of things wrong with his game. Parise is a GREAT 2-way player, great at battling for loose pucks, loves going to the danger areas, plays with a tonne of heart, plays great d, and he's better than Kessel offensively too (not more talented, but more effective). Parise, in my mind, is a MAJOR upgrade, I'm not in love with the idea of building around Kessel, but I do like the idea of building around Parise. In terms of his overall play he'd be arguably the best Leafs since Gilmour (I'm talking about "peak" type play, not career/longevity where Mats obviously wins, but a healthy Parise is a top 10 player in the league, Mats wasn't really)

c) So, I see Kessel to Parise as a MAJOR upgrade, something I'd be willing to throw in solid pieces for. The goalie (Scrivens, Rynnas or even Gustavsson) would be valuable to them (in need of young goalies), but not as much to us, we have tonnes of young goalies. It would suck to lose a good young player (like Colborne, Gardiner, Blacker, Percy, Gunnarsson or Franson), but it's a sacrifice I'd be willing to make if it meant having a stud like Parise to build around

d) Again, this would be assuming that he's perfectly healthy, and that he'd be willing to sign a decently reasonable deal, something like 7 years at $7 mil per year, front loaded, which is fair for an RFA like Parise IMO

ponder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 11:49 AM
  #43
robdicks
Registered User
 
robdicks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Welland ON
Posts: 5,330
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponder View Post
a) Parise is a superstar, the two seasons before his injury he was a top 10 player in the league, and he's just 26, if he's indeed fully healthy but NJ are still looking to trade him (something I seriously doubt happens), then he's going to command a GREAT return. No packages built around Kadri or MacArthur, there has to be a serious centerpiece coming back, because other teams will offer a serious centerpiece. Something like Kessel, IMO

b) From our point of view, Kessel is a talented but flawed player. Great skater, unreal shot, nice hands in general, but he's trash along the boards, trash in puck battles, plays poor defense, not exactly a "battler" type, there's just a lot of things wrong with his game. Parise is a GREAT 2-way player, great at battling for loose pucks, loves going to the danger areas, plays with a tonne of heart, plays great d, and he's better than Kessel offensively too (not more talented, but more effective). Parise, in my mind, is a MAJOR upgrade, I'm not in love with the idea of building around Kessel, but I do like the idea of building around Parise. In terms of his overall play he'd be arguably the best Leafs since Gilmour (I'm talking about "peak" type play, not career/longevity where Mats obviously wins, but a healthy Parise is a top 10 player in the league, Mats wasn't really)

c) So, I see Kessel to Parise as a MAJOR upgrade, something I'd be willing to throw in solid pieces for. The goalie (Scrivens, Rynnas or even Gustavsson) would be valuable to them (in need of young goalies), but not as much to us, we have tonnes of young goalies. It would suck to lose a good young player (like Colborne, Gardiner, Blacker, Percy, Gunnarsson or Franson), but it's a sacrifice I'd be willing to make if it meant having a stud like Parise to build around

d) Again, this would be assuming that he's perfectly healthy, and that he'd be willing to sign a decently reasonable deal, something like 7 years at $7 mil per year, front loaded, which is fair for an RFA like Parise IMO
very rare that I agree with everything a poster on here says. Well put.

robdicks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 11:49 AM
  #44
hero
leafshero.wordpress
 
hero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Posts: 16,387
vCash: 125
Parise would be dealt for more cheap and ready assests than what we have to give

hero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 12:13 PM
  #45
ULF_55
Global Moderator
 
ULF_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mountain Standard Ti
Posts: 50,189
vCash: 500
Quote:
The Atlanta Thrashers dealt their captain, an impending free agent, to the Devils on Thursday night for a package that includes defenseman Johnny Oduya, rookie forward Niclas Bergfors, junior prospect Patrice Cormier and New Jersey's first-round pick in the 2010 NHL Entry Draft.
Here is what Devils traded for Kovalchuk.

Makes no sense to weaken the team by sending a key player away for another key player.

He's like Kovalchuk, a winger.

__________________
Woodlief
using his big frame to create space and his skating ability to find open lanes to drive the net. He stands 6-3 and is a natural goal scorer with plenty of confidence.

He's a scout's dream in the way he prepares himself and plays an unselfish game, making smart decisions with the puck. With his bloodlines, he certainly understands what it will take to make it at the next level.
ULF_55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 02:01 PM
  #46
mooseOAK*
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 42,437
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULF_55 View Post
Here is what Devils traded for Kovalchuk.

Makes no sense to weaken the team by sending a key player away for another key player.

He's like Kovalchuk, a winger.
I wonder if that contract is holding things up. Parise could say that he was the team's leading scorer for two consecutive seasons so where is his $100 million?

mooseOAK* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 02:13 PM
  #47
The Iceman
Registered User
 
The Iceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,114
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by mooseOAK View Post
I wonder if that contract is holding things up. Parise could say that he was the team's leading scorer for two consecutive seasons so where is his $100 million?
Kessel for Parise advantage Leafs
Kessel + Jesse Blacker and a draft pick makes the deal possible.
A trade only comes in to play if the expectation is that Parise will only sign a 1 year contract and become a UFA, or if Parise gets a contract of higher value than Kessel's currently is.

The Iceman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 02:40 PM
  #48
ULF_55
Global Moderator
 
ULF_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mountain Standard Ti
Posts: 50,189
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Iceman View Post
Kessel for Parise advantage Leafs
Kessel + Jesse Blacker and a draft pick makes the deal possible.
A trade only comes in to play if the expectation is that Parise will only sign a 1 year contract and become a UFA, or if Parise gets a contract of higher value than Kessel's currently is.
I'm sure Parise would do better with Crabb and Bozak as his linemates in Toronto.


Crabb-Bozak-Parise
Kadri-Grabovski-Kulemin
Lupul-Colborne-Kessel


85 points from Parise
35 goals from Kulemin
40 goals from Kessel

Looks good.

ULF_55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 02:41 PM
  #49
ponder
Registered User
 
ponder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 10,606
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULF_55 View Post
Here is what Devils traded for Kovalchuk.

Makes no sense to weaken the team by sending a key player away for another key player.

He's like Kovalchuk, a winger.
Kovalchuk was a rental set to become a UFA, while if Parise was traded it would be a Kessel type deal, he's an RFA and it would be built around him being signed long term. Completely different situation.

If:
a) Parise is healthy
b) The Devils are looking to deal him
c) He's willing to sign a reasonable RFA contract with a new team, something like a front loaded 7 years, $7 mil per year deal

Then he would command a major, major return, simply because a tonne of teams would be competing for him, and many teams would be willing to offer major pieces. Teams will offer a lot for a young superstar signed long term, that is a fact, there is no way he would be dealt for spare parts if he's healthy and willing to sign a decent contract.

If he's set on going to arbitration, or if there are healthy concerns, then his value would be much lower, but a re-signed, healthy Parise would command A TONNE, and rightfully so.

ponder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
07-19-2011, 02:44 PM
  #50
ULF_55
Global Moderator
 
ULF_55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Mountain Standard Ti
Posts: 50,189
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by ponder View Post
Kovalchuk was a rental set to become a UFA, while if Parise was traded it would be a Kessel type deal, he's an RFA and it would be built around him being signed long term. Completely different situation.

If:
a) Parise is healthy
b) The Devils are looking to deal him
c) He's willing to sign a deal in the 7 years, $7 mil per year range with a new team

Then he would command a major, major return, simply because a tonne of teams would be competing for him, and willing to offer a tonne. Teams will offer a lot for a young superstar signed long term, that is a fact, there is no way he would be dealt for spare parts (if he's healthy and willing to sign a decent contract).
Parise is a 1 year rental. Kessel was coming off his ELS, and had 4 years to UFA status.

ULF_55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:05 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.