HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Topics may include the CBA, work stoppages, broadcast contracts, franchise sales, and NHL revenues.

Vancouver confirmed!

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old
08-04-2004, 02:40 PM
  #1
hockey_nut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,769
vCash: 500
Vancouver confirmed!

http://www.thefourthperiod.com/wha/news21.html

hockey_nut is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 02:47 PM
  #2
RyanM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Sydney
Country: Canada
Posts: 989
vCash: 500
What a shock, another announced WHA team with no lease in place yet .

Toronto is already out(http://www.tsn.ca/news_story.asp?ID=93575) and slowly the rest will all end up like them, complaining a lease can't be done then eventually shutting down a league that STILL does not have any building leases in place(that i've seen) or 1 player or coach under contract just 2 1/2 months before it's supposed to start :lol .

This thing had some major potential, but they've wasted it and time is running out to get it back.

RyanM is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 02:49 PM
  #3
hockey_nut
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,769
vCash: 500
time's just about run out... this is looking pretty damn pathetic

hockey_nut is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 03:06 PM
  #4
Russian_fanatic
Registered User
 
Russian_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,638
vCash: 500
Hey if Van is confirmed great, but I still wont watch it...

Russian_fanatic is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 04:46 PM
  #5
Lard_Lad
Registered User
 
Lard_Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,678
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by RyanM
Toronto is already out(http://www.tsn.ca/news_story.asp?ID=93575) and slowly the rest will all end up like them, complaining a lease can't be done then eventually shutting down a league that STILL does not have any building leases in place(that i've seen) or 1 player or coach under contract just 2 1/2 months before it's supposed to start :lol .
To be fair, Detroit does have a lease at the Silverdome and has Moe Mantha signed to coach. But that's it.

Lard_Lad is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 07:28 PM
  #6
Avery4Byng*
 
Avery4Byng*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ktown
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,752
vCash: 500
I agree it sounds like a joke. But come October when there is no NHL I just MIGHT tune into some games......

Avery4Byng* is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 07:35 PM
  #7
incawg
Registered User
 
incawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canuckland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,009
vCash: 500
The team name will be the Vancouver Blazers, as it was the last time the WHA was in town. It also sounds like a deal to play in GM Place is very close.

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/artic...04_153028_3020

incawg is offline  
Old
08-04-2004, 11:30 PM
  #8
mikefavata
A.I.M.
 
mikefavata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Juno Beach, FL
Country: United States
Posts: 4,445
vCash: 500
What a joke.

mikefavata is offline  
Old
08-05-2004, 12:35 AM
  #9
Lard_Lad
Registered User
 
Lard_Lad's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Kelowna
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,678
vCash: 500
Interesting that Orca Bay would let them into GM Place (if that's true - we've seen that kind of "optimism" from the WHA before.) Seems a bit strange to allow a competitor to use your building, even if the NHL is locked out, but it'd also give an NHL club some serious power over the WHA. If they dictate the lease terms, the second the Blazers have trouble making a payment (and you know it's going to happen), the Canucks can boot them out and they're suddenly homeless. Not good for the WHA.

Lard_Lad is offline  
Old
08-05-2004, 12:52 AM
  #10
Russian_fanatic
Registered User
 
Russian_fanatic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Posts: 6,638
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tray
I agree it sounds like a joke. But come October when there is no NHL I just MIGHT tune into some games......
You got the Kelowna Rockets

Russian_fanatic is offline  
Old
08-05-2004, 03:21 AM
  #11
Avery4Byng*
 
Avery4Byng*'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Ktown
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,752
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Russian_fanatic
You got the Kelowna Rockets
Yes very true, and I have season tickets as well. But I mean come on, what a winter without Hockey Night In Canada........

Avery4Byng* is offline  
Old
08-05-2004, 01:03 PM
  #12
Papa Smurf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Country: Bahrain
Posts: 1,345
vCash: 500



Jusy keepin' it alive.

Papa Smurf is offline  
Old
08-05-2004, 04:23 PM
  #13
Scottkmlps
Moderator
 
Scottkmlps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Ladysmith, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 9,384
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by incawg
The team name will be the Vancouver Blazers, as it was the last time the WHA was in town. It also sounds like a deal to play in GM Place is very close.

http://www.sportsnet.ca/hockey/artic...04_153028_3020
No, it might not be the Blazers. They need permission from the Kamloops Blazers to use the name 'Blazers' cause of legal matters.
That's just what I heard on the radio this morning.

Scottkmlps is online now  
Old
08-06-2004, 02:02 PM
  #14
incawg
Registered User
 
incawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Canuckland
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,009
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scottkmlps
No, it might not be the Blazers. They need permission from the Kamloops Blazers to use the name 'Blazers' cause of legal matters.
That's just what I heard on the radio this morning.
Erm, that seems a bit odd to me. It's not like the Dallas franchise needed permission from the Rochester Americans to use that name. Besides, the original WHA team in Vancouver (in the mid 70s) was called the Blazers. It seems to me that they would only need permission if they were going to be using the same logo.

incawg is offline  
Old
08-06-2004, 02:06 PM
  #15
Papa Smurf
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Oshawa, Ontario
Country: Bahrain
Posts: 1,345
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by incawg
Erm, that seems a bit odd to me. It's not like the Dallas franchise needed permission from the Rochester Americans to use that name. Besides, the original WHA team in Vancouver (in the mid 70s) was called the Blazers. It seems to me that they would only need permission if they were going to be using the same logo.
The Winnipeg Jets needed permission from the NFL's NY Jets.

Papa Smurf is offline  
Closed Thread

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2014 All Rights Reserved.