HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > General Hockey Discussion > The Business of Hockey
The Business of Hockey Discuss the financial and business aspects of the NHL. Franchise sales, valuations, TV contracts, ratings, expansion, relocation, the CBA and work stoppage discussion goes here.

2011-2012 NHL TV Ratings Thread

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
09-01-2011, 01:31 PM
  #1
tarheelhockey
Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 23,626
vCash: 500
2011-2012 NHL TV Ratings Thread

Official TV Ratings thread for the upcoming season.
All posts in this thread should refer to TV Ratings and Revenues made by the NHL based on TV contracts, Ads, and so on.... All opinions and positive contributions to this thread are welcomed and encouraged.
** Do NOT use this thread to bash another team's fanbase/ratings **


Previous Ratings Threads:
2010-2011: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=819013
2009-2010: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=679978
2008-2009: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=558601
2008 Playoffs: http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=504895



The new Nielsen market ratings have been released, so this seems like the right time to get the 2011-12 TV ratings/revenues thread started.

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvspy/nie...move-up_b20365

2010-11 Rank 2011-12 Rank Difference DMA Name 2011 TV Homes 2012 TV Homes
1 1 New York 7,515,330 7,387,810
2 2 Los Angeles 5,666,900 5,569,780
3 3 Chicago 3,502,610 3,493,480
4 4 Philadelphia 3,015,820 2,993,370
5 5 Dallas-Ft. Worth 2,594,630 2,571,310
6 6 San Francisco-Oak-San Jose 2,523,520 2,506,510
7 7 Boston (Manchester) 2,460,290 2,379,690
9 8 +1 Washington, DC (Hagrstwn) 2,389,710 2,360,180
8 9 -1 Atlanta 2,407,080 2,292,640
10 10 Houston 2,177,220 2,185,260
11 11 Detroit 1,883,840 1,842,650
13 12 +1 Seattle-Tacoma 1,874,750 1,811,420
12 13 -1 Phoenix (Prescott) 1,881,310 1,811,330
14 14 Tampa-St. Pete (Sarasota) 1,795,200 1,788,240
15 15 Minneapolis-St. Paul 1,753,780 1,721,940
16 16 Miami-Ft. Lauderdale 1,580,580 1,583,800
17 17 Denver 1,572,740 1,548,570
18 18 Cleveland-Akron (Canton) 1,526,200 1,514,170
19 19 Orlando-Daytona Bch-Melbrn 1,453,120 1,465,460
20 20 Sacramnto-Stkton-Modesto 1,409,400 1,388,570
21 21 St. Louis 1,258,580 1,253,920
22 22 Portland, OR 1,197,780 1,190,010
24 23 +1 Pittsburgh 1,160,820 1,171,490
25 24 +1 Raleigh-Durham (Fayetvlle) 1,131,310 1,143,420
23 25 -2 Charlotte 1,166,180 1,140,900
27 26 +1 Indianapolis 1,106,420 1,109,970
26 27 -1 Baltimore 1,108,360 1,097,310
28 28 San Diego 1,089,010 1,077,600
29 29 Nashville 1,039,430 1,024,560
30 30 Hartford & New Haven 1,018,770 1,006,280
31 31 Kansas City 974,820 939,740
34 32 +2 Columbus, OH 915,950 932,680
32 33 -1 Salt Lake City 953,950 927,540
35 34 +1 Milwaukee 901,100 907,660
33 35 -2 Cincinnati 923,830 896,090
37 36 +1 San Antonio 844,910 880,690
36 37 -1 Greenvll-Spart-Ashevll-And 878,550 860,930
38 38 West Palm Beach-Ft. Pierce 773,890 788,020
40 39 +1 Birmingham (Ann and Tusc) 747,190 738,790
42 40 +2 Las Vegas 718,030 737,300
39 41 -2 Harrisburg-Lncstr-Leb-York 749,020 729,440
41 42 -1 Grand Rapids-Kalmzoo-B.Crk 740,230 722,150
43 43 Norfolk-Portsmth-Newpt Nws 716,050 718,750
45 44 +1 Oklahoma City 704,670 712,630
46 45 +1 Albuquerque-Santa Fe 703,720 710,050
47 46 +1 Greensboro-H.Point-W.Salem 699,040 691,200
44 47 -3 Austin 707,430 686,830
50 48 +2 Louisville 674,940 674,050
48 49 -1 Memphis 693,860 669,940
49 50 -1 Jacksonville 678,430 669,840
51 51 Buffalo 636,320 645,190

The biggest change in the top-25 was due to rapid depopulation in Charlotte, which was hit very hard by the banking crisis and lost a lot of jobs in that industry. Amazing how few of these cities are taking on population right now, especially the larger cities and some of the "hot" small cities of recent years.


Last edited by tarheelhockey: 09-01-2011 at 02:29 PM.
tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2011, 02:04 PM
  #2
throatguzzler
Registered User
 
throatguzzler's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Philly'ish
Country: United States
Posts: 107
vCash: 500
Am I the only one surprised to see an increase in Buffalo's population?

throatguzzler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2011, 02:23 PM
  #3
AdmiralsFan24
Registered User
 
AdmiralsFan24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hartland, Wisconsin
Country: United States
Posts: 3,490
vCash: 50
Send a message via AIM to AdmiralsFan24
It's not an increase in population, just more homes with TV's.

AdmiralsFan24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2011, 02:25 PM
  #4
tarheelhockey
Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 23,626
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdmiralsFan24 View Post
It's not an increase in population, just more homes with TV's.
While you are right that they are counting homes with TVs, honestly I think it has more to do with population movement than anything. It's hard to imagine the number of people with/without TV sets varies much over time.

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2011, 02:30 PM
  #5
tarheelhockey
Moderator
 
tarheelhockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: The Triangle
Country: United States
Posts: 23,626
vCash: 500
Fleshed out the OP a bit with disclaimer and links that were used in previous editions of this thread.

tarheelhockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2011, 02:54 PM
  #6
Jonas1235
Registered User
 
Jonas1235's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 3,246
vCash: 500
From Luke DeCock on Twitter:
Canes and Preds will each get 40 games in Atlanta TV market this year, GM Jim Rutherford said today. Possible preseason game there in 2012.

That's more games than the Thrashers ever had on tv in any season.

Jonas1235 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-01-2011, 08:00 PM
  #7
CanadaIsHockey
Registered User
 
CanadaIsHockey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Laval, Qc. Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,523
vCash: 500
Beat me to it. Was planning on creating this thread any day now .

CanadaIsHockey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2011, 09:54 AM
  #8
Mwd711
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 557
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelhockey View Post
While you are right that they are counting homes with TVs, honestly I think it has more to do with population movement than anything. It's hard to imagine the number of people with/without TV sets varies much over time.
Many people have cut the cord because of the economy. Also, younger people are using the internet more often to view shows. Most of these cities aren't losing population, they are losing TV sets. Check the census numbers. Washington D.C. is one of the fastest growing areas in the US. Many of those new people to the area are young professionals that have cut the cord and rely on the internet instead. I don't think it's a coincidence that many of the cities with gains in TV's are places with older populations (Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, etc.)

Mwd711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-02-2011, 10:33 AM
  #9
kdb209
Global Moderator
 
kdb209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mwd711 View Post
Many people have cut the cord because of the economy. Also, younger people are using the internet more often to view shows. Most of these cities aren't losing population, they are losing TV sets. Check the census numbers. Washington D.C. is one of the fastest growing areas in the US. Many of those new people to the area are young professionals that have cut the cord and rely on the internet instead. I don't think it's a coincidence that many of the cities with gains in TV's are places with older populations (Phoenix, Pittsburgh, Buffalo, etc.)
And if the Bay Area had managed to cut 6,510 more cords, then the Sharks would have been eligible for Revenue Sharing again this year.

kdb209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-05-2011, 03:59 PM
  #10
No Fun Shogun
Registered User
 
No Fun Shogun's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Chicagoland, IL
Country: United States
Posts: 11,954
vCash: 1000
Interesting.... never would've guessed that Dallas-Fort Worth would have less TVs than Philadelphia.

No Fun Shogun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-05-2011, 05:28 PM
  #11
kdb209
Global Moderator
 
kdb209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 11,467
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by No Fun Shogun View Post
Interesting.... never would've guessed that Dallas-Fort Worth would have less TVs than Philadelphia.
DMAs frequently extend beyond the city proper and metro areas.

Truck Ads has some very useful DMA maps:

http://www.truckads.com/licensed_affiliates1.asp#usamap

http://www.truckads.com/Affiliate/Philadelphia.htm#map

Quote:
18 COUNTIES IN THIS DMA

Kent, DE ~ New Castle, DE ~ Atlantic, NJ ~ Burlington, NJ ~ Camden, NJ ~ Cape May, NJ ~ Cumberland, NJ ~ Gloucester, NJ ~ Mercer, NJ ~ Salem, NJ ~ Berks, PA ~ Bucks, PA ~ Chester, PA ~ Delaware, PA ~ Lehigh, PA ~ Montgomery, PA ~ Northampton, PA ~ Philadelphia, PA

http://www.truckads.com/Affiliate/Da..._Worth.htm#map

Quote:
32 COUNTIES IN THIS DMA

Anderson, TX ~ Bosque, TX ~ Collin, TX ~ Comanche, TX ~ Cooke, TX ~ Dallas, TX ~ Delta, TX ~ Denton, TX ~ Ellis, TX ~ Erath, TX ~ Fannin, TX ~ Freestone, TX ~ Hamilton, TX ~ Henderson, TX ~ Hill, TX ~ Hood, TX ~ Hopkins, TX ~ Hunt, TX ~ Jack, TX ~ Johnson, TX ~ Kaufman, TX ~ Lamar, TX ~ Navarro, TX ~ Palo Pinto, TX ~ Parker, TX ~ Rains, TX ~ Red River, TX ~ Rockwall, TX ~ Somervell, TX ~ Tarrant, TX ~ Van Zandt, TX ~ Wise, TX

kdb209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 11:06 AM
  #12
Fugu
Guest
 
Country:
Posts: n/a
vCash:
I removed "Revenues" from the title. I can't remember the last time specific TV revenue info was relevant in this thread.

  Reply With Quote
Old
09-23-2011, 02:36 PM
  #13
Alan Jackson
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Langley, BC
Country: Canada
Posts: 4,142
vCash: 500
Nearly 500,000 people tune in to Jet's PRE-SEASON opener:

http://ctvmedia.ca/tsn/releases/rele...4253&yyyy=2011

Alan Jackson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-23-2011, 02:36 PM
  #14
skeena1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 614
vCash: 500
TSN Release

September 23, 2011

TSN Jets Scores Big Audience for First Pre-Season Game

– Close to half a million people tuned in to see TSN Jets’ debut on Tuesday –

To tweet this release: http://*******/rpqSHD

Winnipeg, MB (September 23, 2011) – The long awaited return of the Winnipeg Jets scored big for the new regional channel TSN Jets Tuesday night. Data from BBM Canada confirms that more than 490,000 viewers in the Jets broadcast region watched some or all of Tuesday’s pre-season game against the Columbus Blue Jackets.

The audience Reach is especially impressive given that TSN Jets is available in approximately 500,000 homes throughout Manitoba, Saskatchewan, Nunavut and the Northwest Territories, and parts of Northwestern Ontario.

“This is an incredible debut for a new television service,” said Stewart Johnston, President, TSN. “I can’t ever remember this type of excitement for a pre-season game. We are looking forward to building on this momentum throughout the season.”

The average audience for the full broadcast on Tuesday was 148,000 total viewers. TSN Jets regional coverage continues tomorrow night with Winnipeg @ Nashville at 5:45 p.m. CT.

skeena1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-23-2011, 04:20 PM
  #15
blues10
HFBoards Sponsor
 
blues10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Country: Canada
Posts: 2,739
vCash: 500
TSN Jets Ratings Success

TSN Jets is off to a good start with 490 000 viewers tuning in.
Quote:
TSN JETS CHANNEL SCORES BIG RATINGS FOR WINNIPEG OPENER

The long awaited return of the Winnipeg Jets scored big for the new regional channel TSN Jets Tuesday night. Data from BBM Canada confirms that more than 490,000 viewers in the Jets broadcast region watched some or all of Tuesday's pre-season game against the Columbus Blue Jackets.
http://www.tsn.ca/nhl/story/?id=376528

blues10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-24-2011, 09:24 PM
  #16
frivolousz21
Registered User
 
frivolousz21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: St. Louis, Mo
Country: United States
Posts: 1,631
vCash: 500
Those numbers are why the NHL need to move at least one more team to Oh Canada and try to streamline the TV deals on a National/Local/Regional level.

The NHL is getting ***** in Canada in terms of TV money and it has to stop.

frivolousz21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-26-2011, 03:07 AM
  #17
skeena1
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 614
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frivolousz21 View Post
Those numbers are why the NHL need to move at least one more team to Oh Canada and try to streamline the TV deals on a National/Local/Regional level.

The NHL is getting ***** in Canada in terms of TV money and it has to stop.
Unless TSN is getting paid by the Jets to produce the broadcasts or getting them for nothing, at 148K per game they won't be making dollar one.

skeena1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-26-2011, 03:52 AM
  #18
Burningblades
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 650
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by frivolousz21 View Post
Those numbers are why the NHL need to move at least one more team to Oh Canada and try to streamline the TV deals on a National/Local/Regional level.

The NHL is getting ***** in Canada in terms of TV money and it has to stop.
The NHL gets around 300 million from the national deals in Canada alone not counting the regional deals. On a per capita basis that would be the same as a 3 billion deal in the US.

Burningblades is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-26-2011, 03:57 AM
  #19
saskganesh
Registered User
 
saskganesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: the Annex
Country: Canada
Posts: 1,820
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by skeena1 View Post
Unless TSN is getting paid by the Jets to produce the broadcasts or getting them for nothing, at 148K per game they won't be making dollar one.
These are regional ratings.

148k, if that holds as an average audience, would put them just below a little team called the New York Rangers in 09-10.

see post 22, http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=819013

saskganesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-26-2011, 07:45 PM
  #20
Jaded-Fan
Registered User
 
Jaded-Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 28,069
vCash: 500
Pens preseason game outdrew all but two teams regular season average.

Other interesting tidbits are over 9000 season ticket waiting list. Not bad for a bunch of bandwagoners.


During the town hall meeting, which was invitation-only, team president David Morehouse revealed the team's season ticket waiting list has climbed to 9,000. When he asked how many in attendance were added to the list of active ticket holders this season, only a smattering of applause was heard -- an indication of how little turnover there has been.

Morehouse outlined some of the franchise's accomplishments off the ice, including its ongoing streak of 210 consecutive sellouts -- a run that began at the now-closed Civic Arena, which is due to be demolished beginning Monday. The Penguins played there from 1967-2010.

The Penguins, Morehouse said, were No. 1 in NHL merchandise sales last season and No. 1 in local TV ratings. A preseason telecast against Detroit last week drew a higher rating than the regular season average of all but two other franchises.


http://www.nhl.com/ice/news.htm?id=589812

Jaded-Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-27-2011, 10:54 AM
  #21
mucker*
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Let's Be Safe!
Posts: 3,082
vCash: 500
PIT=true hockeytown

mucker* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-27-2011, 09:44 PM
  #22
Watch for the Yeti
9 more wins!
 
Watch for the Yeti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Swansea, MA
Country: United States
Posts: 4,532
vCash: 500
Leafs-Flyers preseason game draws 68k

http://puckthemedia.wordpress.com/20...ers-on-versus/

NBC SportsTalk at 17,000 yikes!

Watch for the Yeti is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-28-2011, 09:34 AM
  #23
Mwd711
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 557
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by BostonKid97 View Post
Leafs-Flyers preseason game draws 68k

http://puckthemedia.wordpress.com/20...ers-on-versus/

NBC SportsTalk at 17,000 yikes!
That's actually higher than some nights. The show is averaging around 10,000 viewers while Daren Rovell's ratings have dropped every week since it premiered. This is from a couple of weeks ago but it's still valid overall to Versus' woes. From http://paranoidpuck.wordpress.com/20...e-for-viewers/
Quote:
Versus unveiled a slate of new programming over the last couple of weeks but it is yet to translate to much rating success. NBC SportsTalk has been a complete bomb since its debut. It had a high of 14,000 viewers last week while it hovered around a measly 10,000 for the entire week. That would put it in a battle with the Florida Panthers, Phoenix Coyotes and Atlanta Thrashers for viewers if we were comparing it to local NHL ratings.

Darren Rovell’s GameOn sports business show didn’t fare much better with a debut of 36,000 viewers. The debut of College Football Talk also brought in 36,000 viewers. The much hyped NFL Turning Point was the high point with 126,000 viewers while Pro Football Talk was behind it with 90,000 viewers. Those ratings are comparable with ESPN2′s Jim Rome Is Burning and the new Numbers Don’t Lie which air in the middle of the afternoon.
When it comes to the preseason games, I really question the decision to pick up any games. I think this was an experiment but it doesn't appear to be paying off much. It's probably better than whatever Versus would air in that timeslot but those ratings are brutal. One think I don't get is why they scheduled a game at the same time as NHL Network. On several nights this past week, the nets were competing against each other, airing two different games. It's funny that they shied away from doing it during the playoffs, but found it okay to compete during the preseason when nobody's watching.

Mwd711 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-28-2011, 11:57 AM
  #24
Brodie
only I may dance
 
Brodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Michigan
Country: United Kingdom
Posts: 9,068
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by tarheelhockey View Post
While you are right that they are counting homes with TVs, honestly I think it has more to do with population movement than anything. It's hard to imagine the number of people with/without TV sets varies much over time.
Are you kidding? A good 75% of my friends don't own TVs. For many, many younger people it's just a totally unnecessary expense, especially when you can watch everything on your computer. I imagine a lot of people have ditched their TVs as the economy has stagnated.

Brodie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-28-2011, 12:15 PM
  #25
Greyhounds
Registered User
 
Greyhounds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nashua
Country: United States
Posts: 10,817
vCash: 500
I, for one, wasn't even aware that Versus also had pre-season games on. Don't pay a lot of attention to those games, but I would have tuned in, for background noise.

I was going to check in at some point, to see what they were showing, but then I figured...nah, they won't show any games until the season starts.

Greyhounds is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:59 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.