HFBoards

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Pacific Division > Los Angeles Kings
Mobile Hockey's Future Become a Sponsor Site Rules Support Forum vBookie Page 2
Notices

Have we seen the best of BRAD RICHARDSON, or can he raise his play to another level?

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old
09-08-2011, 02:18 PM
  #26
Kurrilino
Go Stoll Go
 
Kurrilino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Calgary
Country: Canada
Posts: 5,598
vCash: 500
Send a message via MSN to Kurrilino
Quote:
Originally Posted by tigermask48 View Post
I can't see anyone else being added as the Kings top 9 is already set the way I see it:

Penner-Kopitar-Williams
Gagne-Richards-Brown
Clifford-Stoll-Parse
fourth line will be a combo of Richardson, Lewis, Westgarth, and Moreau as needed...
Richardson and Lewis can fill in as the center replacements and Moreau, Lewis, Parse serve as fill ins on the wings. I'd like to see one of Richardson or Lewis as the fulltime fourth line center. You also have to consider that one of Drewiske or Martinez should serve as the defensive spare and I'm not sure there's room for anyone else if the team stays healthy...

Also I'm not positive but I think Parse played most of college at RW.
I kinda like this as bootom 6 line but then parse has to be taken off.
If we uses it as top 9 Stoll to be removed.
I don't see any chemistry in this line.
Stoll is not a playmaker, Clifford not a scorer and Parse not a grinder.
From my POW this line will be as ineffective as it can be

Kurrilino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-08-2011, 04:27 PM
  #27
tigermask48
Maniacal Laugh
 
tigermask48's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: R'Lyeh, Antarctica
Country: Antarctica
Posts: 2,994
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurrilino View Post
I kinda like this as bootom 6 line but then parse has to be taken off.
If we uses it as top 9 Stoll to be removed.
I don't see any chemistry in this line.
Stoll is not a playmaker, Clifford not a scorer and Parse not a grinder.
From my POW this line will be as ineffective as it can be
If you don't like that line how can you like either of the top two lines?

In my lineup each line has a gritty crash the net winger (Clifford, Penner, Brown) a skilled defensively responsible center (Kopitar, Richards, Stoll) and a winger with solid all around offensive skill (Gagne, Williams, Parse.) The general structure of my top three lines are identical with the only real difference being a decrease in high end skill. So you can't really say the top two are ok chemistry-wise but the third line has none when we haven't seen any of them play together yet. Especially when as I pointed out the structure of the top three lines is general the same mixing of type of players.

Also i'm not sure what you mean by the bolded part. Are you saying Parse should be on the fourth line wing? Or that Stoll should be the 4th line center?

tigermask48 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:52 AM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2015, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. 2015 All Rights Reserved.