HFBoards  

Go Back   HFBoards > NHL Western Conference > Northwest Division > Minnesota Wild
Notices

value of Brodziak???

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old
09-21-2011, 02:00 PM
  #1
Blitz
Registered User
 
Blitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fergus, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 887
vCash: 500
value of Brodziak???

Sabres fan coming in peace.

Was just curious what Minnesota would be looking for from Buffalo to move Brodziak?

I was reading over on the main boards (http://hfboards.com/showthread.php?t=967027) that he may be on the block according to some opinions.

thoughts???

Blitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:07 PM
  #2
Jarick
Moderator
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 19,063
vCash: 50
Don't see him being moved; we only have three NHL centers as it is. With a new coach it just doesn't make sense to move a good defensive center. Return would probably be a second rounder.

Jarick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:07 PM
  #3
squidz*
dun worry he's cool
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South of the Border
Country: United States
Posts: 11,897
vCash: 500
As an impending UFA, much of the thought around here is that he'd be a trade deadline mover for something around a 2nd round pick. It's possible we'd be interested in a prospect instead, but we're not really looking for the sort of prospect that we could get in return for him. As for roster players (since we're at the start of the season) we're again full up on the caliber of player that he'd be worth, though a team desperate for a quality 3C who has an extra 2C (don't know that that exists) would be a good match.

tl;dr

Brodziak for a 2nd
Any deal that's Brodz+ is probably a no go.

squidz* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:10 PM
  #4
squidz*
dun worry he's cool
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South of the Border
Country: United States
Posts: 11,897
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarick View Post
Don't see him being moved; we only have three NHL centers as it is. With a new coach it just doesn't make sense to move a good defensive center. Return would probably be a second rounder.
If Almond can cut it as 4C, we can likely move Powe to center and slot Gillies up on the third line. The other possibility is if Wellman can somehow make the leap, we can slip Cullen back down to 3C and Wellman into a top 6 role. It's certainly doable, but I think it's unlikely this early in the season. I fully expect to see Brodziak moved at the deadline, but I'd be surprised if anything happened earlier.

squidz* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:22 PM
  #5
nickschultzfan
Registered User
 
nickschultzfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,594
vCash: 500
My ideal scenario would to be trade Cullen in the off-season, sign Parise, and re-sign Brodziak for the 3rd line duty role next season.

Heatley-Koivu-Seto
Parise-Granlund-Clutterbuck
Lats-Brodziak-Bouchard

Yay, but that isn't happening. More likely Brodziak stays on for the season (as we don't have other centers) and is let go after the year.

nickschultzfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:26 PM
  #6
Jarick
Moderator
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 19,063
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by squidz View Post
If Almond can cut it as 4C, we can likely move Powe to center and slot Gillies up on the third line. The other possibility is if Wellman can somehow make the leap, we can slip Cullen back down to 3C and Wellman into a top 6 role. It's certainly doable, but I think it's unlikely this early in the season. I fully expect to see Brodziak moved at the deadline, but I'd be surprised if anything happened earlier.
Should have clarified he could be moved at the deadline if we're out of it; but I don't see going with Almond and Powe as two of our centers early in the year.

Jarick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:27 PM
  #7
rynryn
You are in my hands.
 
rynryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 18,195
vCash: 50
I think most of the opinions thinking he's available are based on a scenario where the Wild are eliminated from playoff contention by the deadline.

rynryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:44 PM
  #8
squidz*
dun worry he's cool
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South of the Border
Country: United States
Posts: 11,897
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jarick View Post
Should have clarified he could be moved at the deadline if we're out of it; but I don't see going with Almond and Powe as two of our centers early in the year.
Agreed, although if Wellman or Almond knock our socks off in preseason play, or an offer is made that blows us away, I think we'd do it now. I also don't know that we necessarily have to be out of it at the deadline to make the trade. If Fletcher isn't going to re-sign them, I think both Brodziak and Zanon will get moved as long as there are buyers out there.

squidz* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 02:45 PM
  #9
Billy Mays Here
Take a breather Mays
 
Billy Mays Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 9,953
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickschultzfan View Post
My ideal scenario would to be trade Cullen in the off-season, sign Parise, and re-sign Brodziak for the 3rd line duty role next season.

Heatley-Koivu-Seto
Parise-Granlund-Clutterbuck
Lats-Brodziak-Bouchard

Yay, but that isn't happening. More likely Brodziak stays on for the season (as we don't have other centers) and is let go after the year.
Clutter on the 2nd line and Bouchard on the 3rd? No way does that happen, switch em' back to where they are now. I don't like to admit it but I don't think we'll see the day where both Heatley and Parise are on the Wild. If we somehow manage to sign Parise we won't have enough money to improve our defense which is our weakest point right now by far. If Parise signs, I think we'll see the departure of either Heatley or Bouchard, Heatley being the more likely one. I'd love to have Parise but improving our defense is more important right now. In our current situation I'll take Doughty over Parise.

Billy Mays Here is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 03:04 PM
  #10
squidz*
dun worry he's cool
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: South of the Border
Country: United States
Posts: 11,897
vCash: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by WILDhockeyfan View Post
Clutter on the 2nd line and Bouchard on the 3rd? No way does that happen, switch em' back to where they are now. I don't like to admit it but I don't think we'll see the day where both Heatley and Parise are on the Wild. If we somehow manage to sign Parise we won't have enough money to improve our defense which is our weakest point right now by far. If Parise signs, I think we'll see the departure of either Heatley or Bouchard, Heatley being the more likely one. I'd love to have Parise but improving our defense is more important right now. In our current situation I'll take Doughty over Parise.
Parise has a semi-realistic chance of signing with the Wild. It's probably not the most likely outcome, but it's not completely absurd. Doughty, Suter, Weber, and others of that sort are just a pipe dream. We're more than likely going to be growing our own talent at least until Granlund, Brodin and the rest of the kids are done with their ELCs.

squidz* is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 03:30 PM
  #11
countrygentleman
John Frusciante
 
countrygentleman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Minnesota
Country: Spain
Posts: 622
vCash: 500
Brodziak was one, if not the only, pleasant surprises last year for us. I think Wild management would like to see what he can do this year again for us. I'd think it'd be unlikely for the Wild to trade him.

countrygentleman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 03:56 PM
  #12
Jarick
Moderator
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 19,063
vCash: 50
Brodziak is neither a problem/distraction nor will he garner a high return. I just can't see anyone "knocking our socks off" or bumping him off the depth chart. He still has value even at fourth line C.

Jarick is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 04:11 PM
  #13
nickschultzfan
Registered User
 
nickschultzfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,594
vCash: 500
I agree that we need a Dman like Suter, more than Parise.

HOWEVER, if we go after Parise, it's because Latendresse can't carry the 2nd line and it makes more sense to sign Parise, than re-sign Latendresse as a RFA.

nickschultzfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 04:44 PM
  #14
forthewild
Registered User
 
forthewild's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,115
vCash: 300
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickschultzfan View Post
I agree that we need a Dman like Suter, more than Parise.

HOWEVER, if we go after Parise, it's because Latendresse can't carry the 2nd line and it makes more sense to sign Parise, than re-sign Latendresse as a RFA.
or you sign parise and have the following


seto koivu heater

lats granlund parise

seems like an ok top 6


getting Parise is in on way hinging on Lats having a up or down year, you have a chance to add a top echelon player and all it costs you is money you do it.

as for value of Brodz, it hinges on this year and what he wants $ wise, if he has good year and wants reasonable money he will be kept if he wants a raise that wild won't give he's gone.

his return will be what people are willing to offer if some team needs a C he could return a 1st (versteeg got a 1st and a 3rd) however the most likely outcome is a 2nd

forthewild is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 04:55 PM
  #15
this providence
Moderator
Chips in Bed Theorem
 
this providence's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 8,510
vCash: 500
I do like Brodziak and he has certainly progressed enough with the organization to the point where he has earned a new contract. However, there are options coming up through Houston that I believe are expected to fill the type of role Brodziak currently fills. Any re-signing is probably depending on what sort of development track player like Almond and others are on, not to mention what type of term Brodziak would be seeking.

If the Wild were out of it by the time the deadline rolls around, I think it's a good bet he'd be shipped off. I think the Wild would definitely be seeking a second round pick. Whether they would get that remains to be seen but that's sort of the precedent already set for a player like him. If they couldn't get that, I think they'd be fine with a third round pick. Not sure that an equivalent prospect would interest them as I'm sure the team would much rather have a guy that they would personally select. One that would also come along with a few more seasons of team control.

If the Wild are firmly entrenched in the playoff race, however, I don't see how he'd be moved. Playoff teams need players like this. Not sure if this proposal would be based on right now or not, but there's zero chance of him being moved until the deadline nears.

__________________

After Meaningless Win - 3/29/12 - Game 77 | SoH-"Who knows, that could have cost us a Cup tonight." | Dooohkay
this providence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 05:19 PM
  #16
Billy Mays Here
Take a breather Mays
 
Billy Mays Here's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 9,953
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by nickschultzfan View Post
I agree that we need a Dman like Suter, more than Parise.

HOWEVER, if we go after Parise, it's because Latendresse can't carry the 2nd line and it makes more sense to sign Parise, than re-sign Latendresse as a RFA.
There-in lies the question. If Lats doesn't perform do we go after Parise? And what happens if we let Lats go to sign Parise instead but Parise signs with someone else as well and we're left with nothing? Then we're REALLY screwed!!! All the Parise speculation is kind of pointless though in my opinion as I don't see the Devils letting him go at any cost. However, with all respect to Heatley I'd rather have Parise on my team instead of him.

Billy Mays Here is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 05:48 PM
  #17
WildisLaw
2.1.13 THE YOUNGER!!
 
WildisLaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Napa Valley, Cali
Country: United States
Posts: 3,261
vCash: 50
Wild can afford both. Trade before/cut lose after heater's contract expires. I'd rather have parise than doughty. I would rather the team load up on offense and have 6 shutdown/good skating defensemen . Once backs is off the books, that's even more dough to spend as well.

WildisLaw is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 05:51 PM
  #18
rynryn
You are in my hands.
 
rynryn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Minny
Country: United States
Posts: 18,195
vCash: 50
I've said it a few times but Brodz for me has become the sort of benchmark for our offense like Schultz is for our D. Just the sort of "middle" guy who always plays the same way, every game. Consistently middle of the road. I find that strangely comforting when the rest of the roster could be swinging around from game to game or shift to shift all over the place--you can pretty much count on Brodz and Schultz to play exactly how you think they will.

rynryn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 09:27 PM
  #19
Mort
Registered User
 
Mort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 27
vCash: 500
Send a message via AIM to Mort
This is a waste of energy. A worse Wild team last year was still in the playoff hunt at the trade deadline. This year's team is even more likely to be in the playoff hunt and so will NOT be UFA sellers. Brodziak stays.

Mort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 09:47 PM
  #20
Northland Wild Man
Run The Goalie!
 
Northland Wild Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Country: United States
Posts: 5,010
vCash: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mort View Post
This is a waste of energy. A worse Wild team last year was still in the playoff hunt at the trade deadline. This year's team is even more likely to be in the playoff hunt and so will NOT be UFA sellers. Brodziak stays.
I would agree but a lot can happen between now and the playoffs. (injuries etc.)

I would like a 2nd or a 2nd plus either a 3rd or a mid level prospect for Brodz depending on the team we trade with. This is assuming we trade him at the deadline as sellers.

Northland Wild Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 09:54 PM
  #21
Minnesota
L'Étoile du Nord
 
Minnesota's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Minnesota
Country: United States
Posts: 10,216
vCash: 50
Quote:
Originally Posted by squidz View Post
Agreed, although if Wellman or Almond knock our socks off in preseason play, or an offer is made that blows us away, I think we'd do it now. I also don't know that we necessarily have to be out of it at the deadline to make the trade. If Fletcher isn't going to re-sign them, I think both Brodziak and Zanon will get moved as long as there are buyers out there.
Just read this regarding Thursday's game:

"The only bad news surrounding the club is that Cody Almond and Casey Wellman have been limited by injuries. These games would be proving grounds for them as both have legitimate chances at making their way to the regular season opener."

Sounds like neither Wellman or Almond will be impressing anytime soon. Looking forward to seeing Phillips, though.

On topic: Brodziak will be gone if we're out of playoff contention, most likely for a 2nd rounder.

Minnesota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-21-2011, 10:48 PM
  #22
Caior89
Registered User
 
Caior89's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: South Brazil
Posts: 1,017
vCash: 126
Secound round pick. If we are running for the playoffs we probably keep him.

Caior89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-22-2011, 06:43 AM
  #23
Blitz
Registered User
 
Blitz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Fergus, ON
Country: Canada
Posts: 887
vCash: 500
Just wanna say thanks for the excellent feedback - Well thought out & well stated. You Minnesota forum folk are fantastic!

Blitz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old
09-22-2011, 08:49 AM
  #24
nickschultzfan
Registered User
 
nickschultzfan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,594
vCash: 500
Koivu-Granlund-Coyle might work after Brodziak and Cullen's contracts end. But I think there still needs to be a stop-gap 3rd line center until Coyle is ready.

nickschultzfan is online now   Reply With Quote
Old
09-22-2011, 09:14 AM
  #25
Jarick
Moderator
 
Jarick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: St Paul, MN
Country: United States
Posts: 19,063
vCash: 50
Yeah and it depends on how the kids develop. Also, are there a lot of teams that run rookies at the checking line center position? Seems that's where you want your vets who are used to the speed/pace of the game and have experience shutting down other teams. I know about J Staal but anyone else?

Jarick is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply

Forum Jump


Bookmarks

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:46 PM.

monitoring_string = "e4251c93e2ba248d29da988d93bf5144"
Contact Us - HFBoards - Archive - Privacy Statement - Terms of Use - Advertise - Top - AdChoices

vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
HFBoards.com is a property of CraveOnline Media, LLC, an Evolve Media, LLC company. ©2013 All Rights Reserved.